Not exact matches
Two people cash have differing
opinions on abortion, h0m0s3xuality,
capital punishment, women's rights, race equality, the treatment of children, animals, and the environment, plus a host of other topics, and still be justified in calling themselves «Christian».
Of course, you know what
capital punishment is and, surely, you have your own
opinion on this issue.
For example, Stevens's thoughts
on his
opinion in the 2008 Baze v. Rees
capital punishment case seemed, for the first time I've seen, to dispel the notion that Stevens is inching toward an absolute rejection of the death penalty as his time
on the Court nears an end.
Even a very incomplete list gives an impression of the large number of significant
opinions he has written: seminal administrative law cases such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, the intellectual property case Sony Corp v. Universal City Studios (which made clear that making individual videotapes of television programs did not constitute copyright infringement), important war
on terror precedents such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, important criminal law cases such as Padilla v. Kentucky (holding that defense counsel must inform the defendant if a guilty plea carries a risk of deportation) and Atkins v. Virginia (which reversed precedent to hold it was unconstitutional to impose
capital punishment on the mentally retarded), and of course Apprendi v. New Jersey (which revolutionized criminal sentencing by holding that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maximums based
on facts other than those decided by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).
In an
opinion piece the Houston Chronicle published a month before Keller was first elected to the CCA in 1994, she called the failure to impose
capital punishment on convicted murderers «a human rights violation — particularly if we take into account the human rights that murderers violate when left alive to kill again.»
L. Rev. 1741 (1987)(discussing the role public outrage and state - level legislative action had
on the Supreme Court's 1976 overruling of a 1972
opinion banning
capital punishment).