Sentences with phrase «opinion on this subject at»

Fact: CNN provides this forum for people to post their opinions on the subject at hand, thus CNN effectively has asked for David Crosby's opinion.

There is a huge range of opinion on this subject at the moment, so it's good to take a step back and look at the facts behind the feelings.

Not exact matches

It's not clear yet whether others in the cryptocurrency industry — or tech at large — share Powell's views, but I'd love to hear your opinions on this subject: DM me on Twitter @jenwieczner or email me at [email protected]

Keep in mind that any opinion or position disclosed on this platform is subject to change at any moment as the thesis evolves.

Opinions will always differ on such a subject, but at the moment there are probably more, including some influential offshore institutions, inclining to the opposite view.

Views and opinions are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions.

Their understanding of s@xuality was skewed by the belief that there are supernatural forces that hold, not just an opinion on the subject, but holds their eternal soul at stake for this notion of sin.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

Poor Bob is grasping at straws because he was too lazy to do his homework on this subject to know about the studies that showed being gay is NOT a mental disorder that changed the experts opinions.

Second tale: Defying all the best previous research on how readily people change their opinions, a young PhD student in political science at a top research university teams up with a senior scholar in his field at another top school to publish a brief report in America's leading scholarly scientific journal that upends everything we thought we knew about the subject.

Lastly PLEASE fellow Arsenal lovers lets embrace the spirit of having different opinions on a subject matter and try to look at each opinion both ways.

Only a select few at Aston Villa Football Club know and, like many journalists, I can only offer my own views and opinions on the subject.

Parents at schools in lower income areas are often times not given fair opportunities to voice their opinion on school food or other school related subjects.

Kenneth Armstrong, professor of European Law at Cambridge University, says this is the «dominant legal opinion» on the subject and the authors of the Article are in agreement.

The hon. Gentleman did not quite say this, but I think what he was driving at is that there is sometimes a tendency for people on social media to volunteer their opinions with an insistence in inverse proportion to their knowledge of the subject matter under discussion.»

«I feel very privileged to be able to articulate my positions and my opinions on a myriad of subjects, and now I've been encouraged by many people in the general public, as well as Democratic funders and high level elected officials on both sides of the party line to seriously consider running,» the former star of «The Nanny» told reporters at the National Press Club in Washington.

Alain Kaloyeros and his associates at Fort Schuyler wouldn't budge when the state Committee on Open Government issued a legal opinion in March that rejected their position that they aren't subject to the FOI Law.

I'm going to throw out a post that's a little bit different from what you're used to at Diesel and then I want your opinion on the subject by leaving a comment below.

One notorious line in the film Cruel Intentions refers to the email format as the last bastion of «social recluses,» and numerous other media have lampooned the process of online dating at one time or another.Needless to say, times have changed, and opinions on this subject have shifted dramatically.

-» (A) IN GENERAL. - To be eligible for assistance under this chapter, a project shall satisfy applicable creditworthiness standards, which, at a minimum, shall include -» (i) a rate covenant, if applicable;» (ii) adequate coverage requirements to ensure repayment;» (iii) an investment grade rating from at least 2 rating agencies on debt senior to the Federal credit instrument; and» (iv) a rating from at least 2 rating agencies on the Federal credit instrument, subject to the condition that, with respect to clause (iii), if the total amount of the senior debt and the Federal credit instrument is less than $ 75,000,000, 1 rating agency opinion for each of the senior debt and Federal credit instrument shall be sufficient.»

a rating from at least 2 rating agencies on the Federal credit instrument, subject to the condition that, with respect to clause (iii), if the senior debt and Federal credit instrument is for an amount less than $ 75,000,000 or for a rural infrastructure project or intelligent transportation systems project, 1 rating agency opinion for each of the senior debt and Federal credit instrument shall be sufficient.

Happy to share his opinions on any subject, Morris suffered fools not at all.

Views and opinions are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions.

It's one of those games that I foresee having one of three effects; you're either going to find the concept itself fascinating and thus appreciate the game as a piece of interactive art regardless of your actual opinion about the art itself; you're going to connect with the game on a personal level thanks to its subject matter, or you're going to be bloody baffled by the entire thing and demand a refund at the end.

When I talk to people about climate change (and the one time that I gave a talk on climate change at a physics colloquium), I always like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even with that background I still am not arrogant enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent opinion on the subject.

In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them on the subject, such as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the conference).

In my experience, libertarians demonstrate greater divergence of opinion: ask any 10 libertarians their opinion on a subject, and you'll get at least 11 answers.

Olson's and Greg's point is that just providing facts will not necessarily do much to change someone's (erroneous) opinion on a subject, at least for most laypeople.

In other words, if people start with a particular opinion or view on a subject, any counter-evidence can create «cognitive dissonance» — discomfort caused by the presence of two irreconcilable ideas in the mind at once.

Though opinion polls indicate the general public is little interested in climate change, there is something at work in society at large that is seen, in the eyes of politicians, to justify their extravagant expenditure of our money and their time on the subject.

I've just come across an important editorial that suggests public opinion may be catching up on the subject, arguing for a serious look at community - wide composting toilets instead of building a new waste water treatment plant.

In delivering his opinion in the House of Lords in Austin, Lord Hope noted there is a distinction «between conditions to which a person may be subjected which are a restriction on his movement and those which amount to a deprivation of his liberty» (at [15]-RRB-.

See Brugger, supra n. 141, at 647 (stating that while Tucker's moot court was «no innovation in legal training,» Tucker enjoyed using it); Butler, supra n. 143, at 29 (stating that «with the higher view of preparing students for speaking and writing on legal subjects, it will be useful to exercise their minds by forensic debates in moot courts, and by requiring from them written opinions on questions of law, and readings and dissertations on statutes and other themes, as circumstances permit»); Laub, supra n. 144, at 14 (quoting Reed's letter to the Dickinson College Trustees on a course of study); Barrow, supra n. 148, at 289.

While most of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before argument, and two counsel were assigned to each side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes of the argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written opinion.124

Nevertheless, he took the opportunity to elaborate on the PMOI standard of review and raised the question as to whether intelligence analyses and sources should be subject to the EU courts at all and «whether, in a system based largely on the confidence which the EU institutions place in the evaluation conducted by the competent national authorities of the seriousness of the evidence or clues to support a freezing measure, an intensive review of that evidence by the EU judicature is in fact appropriate» (Opinion para. 66).

penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.

Though the authors have strong opinions on some controversial subjects (such as the legality of downloading in Canada), they politely constrain them to the Practice and Policy sections at the end of the book — an approach that would be unthinkable for their U.S. counterparts on either the maximalist or minimalist side of the copyright debate.

Unless a termination is deemed to be unfair in the sense of the law (based on political opinion, gender, sexual orientation, etc.) an employment relationship can be terminated at will, only subject to the observance of the statutory or contractual notice period.

With many students horrified at these disconcerting messages, Principal Ty Thompson expressed his opinion on the subject over Twitter.

Buterin recently spoke at a conference earlier in the month of October, and stated his opinion on the subject.

Signature Realty, Inc. v. Tallman (303 A.D. 2d 925)-- if there is any doubt or uncertainty as to the meaning of the disputed language in a brokerage agreement, all ambiguity must be resolved against the broker who prepared it; brokerage agreement was, as a matter of law, ambiguous with respect to the issue of whether broker would earn commissions when tenant exercised an option to renew the lease and therefore broker is not entitled to commissions on rental payments during any renewal term of the lease; broker not entitled to restitution in quasi-contract because there exists a valid and enforceable written contract governing the particular subject matter in dispute; dissenting opinion finds that the brokerage agreement is clear with respect to commissions earned and payable and that tenant was obligated to pay a commission to broker at the time the rental payment was due and owing to landlord, including during renewal terms of the lease.

The ERV states the valuer's opinion as to the open market rent which could reasonably be expected to be achieved on the subject property at the time of valuation.