Sentences with phrase «opinion on your particular case»

Please consult a real estate lawyer for their opinion on your particular case

Not exact matches

I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»

It is not the judges right or duty to express his personal opinions or beliefs while sitting on the bench, especially while giving a verdict.Judges are there to make sure due process and a fair and impartial hearing or trial takes place for all those involved.this particular judge's rant on the muslim world based on his views from serving in the military had absolutely no bearing on the case and should not have even been brought up much less used to chastise the victim with.

But this particular case (it has to be decided by others on a per case basis: in my opinion) it is not a bad idea for this author to come out and break one of AA's rule.

Ticktin outlined the many case hearings that she had sat in on, all with very valid claims on the grounds of political opinion, membership to a particular group and race.

Although one might expect opinion on the matter to be divided along conventional left - right grounds, experience has shown this not to be the case - although the vulnerability of Labour on the issue of top - up fees may have encouraged some to adopt particular stances for political - tactical reasons, rather than on grounds of principle.

It is my opinion that any teacher receiving an adverse score on a VAM model therefore should have the right to understand why he or she got the score awarded and appeal that score based upon the particular facts of any given case.

What is your opinion on this issue, which in any case has a particular environmental impact?

In my particular case, I did demand that their article be corrected as it made libelous remarks specifically identifying me by name and implied some form of cognitive defect based on the fabricated opinions.

Integrity is an issue of particular importance at the science - policy interface, particularly when the scientific case is represented by a consensus that is largely based on expert opinion.

Professor White suggests that it does matter how opinions are written because they have important consequences for the parties in a particular case and for the future.29 He further argues that a crucial part of legal activity is the criticism of opinions on rational, political, and moral grounds because that is how relevant arguments are made in support of changing or retaining current rules of law.30 For him, the bigger question «is whether law will move in the direction of trivializing human experience, and itself, or in the direction of dignifying itself and that experience.»

See Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Formal Opinion 2001 - 1 (concluding that information submitted by e-mail to a law firm via the firm's website was unsolicited; simply including an e-mail link on a law firm's website does not amount to an invitation to transmit confidential information); Iowa State Bar Association Op. 07 - 02 (evaluated whether the lawyer said or did anything to prompt the potential client to provide confidential information to the lawyer, noting that a lawyer's «request to contact» is not the same as a request for information); Massachusetts Bar Association Op. 07 - 01 (concluding that a website is a marketing tool by which a prospective client may identify which lawyers have the expertise necessary to handle a particular case, and that the publication of such information could reasonably lead a prospective client to conclude that, when sending information to the firm via an e-mail link, the firm and its lawyers have implicitly «agreed to consider» whether to form an attorney - client relationship.

After a period in which the ECJ interpreted the doctrine narrower — Opinion 1/94 on the nature of the EU's competence to conclude the WTO agreements being the clearest example — in a string of recent cases the ECJ has returned to a broader reading of the doctrine (see in particular Neighbouring Rights, Opinion 1/13 and Green Network).

It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the court when it comes to decide on the issues before it.

Following up on this case law, the Court also emphasizes with particular vigour the notion of autonomy in its opinion.

If the Court were to follow the opinion of AG Mengozzi in this particular case, this could have a serious impact on the legal landscape and context of EU immigration and asylum law.

This contribution will analyse Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez - Bordona's Opinion in this case, in particular its potential effects on the legal status and copyright protection of HSs.

However, an opinion from the California Court of Appeal that is directly on point to the facts in a particular case can not be cited as persuasive authority by a party or a court.

These opinions of mine are not a substitute for professional legal advice based on a thorough analysis of your particular case against the background of applicable laws.

Other than KRE 614, Lawson's observation of the practice, and the Slaughter case, there was not much in the way of modern case law or authority in Kentucky to instruct trial judges and litigators on any particular procedural or substantive considerations for allowing juror questions, until the Kentucky Supreme Court issued its opinion in Fraser v. Miller, 427 S.W. 3d 182 (Ky. 2014).

the Court held that while: «practice guidelines» may be generally respected and therefore relevant considerations in the Court's assessment of the standard of care, they are not intended to, and do not determine the legal standard of care that the Court will impose on a medical professional, especially where there is expert opinion evidence on the standard of care with reference to the facts of the particular case.

For years, law students have focused on judicial opinions, explaining why a case was decided in a particular way.

Ad point 3 (and a number of other points raised in this blog): you might wish to read the Opinion of AG Bobek in a parallel case C - 574 / 15, Scialdone, delivered on 13 July 2017, in particular section C thereof.

The outcome often comes down to the subjective opinion of a particular judge on a case - by - case basis.

This information should not be construed as specific legal advice nor as an opinion on particular facts, cases, or situations.