Often I have a different
opinion than the articles I post on Interesting Stuff On The Web but they are all well written pieces.
Not exact matches
«When people read an
article that comes from a source they trust, it shapes their
opinion much more
than any ad possibly can.»
Between CNBC, Fox Business News, and a myriad of online and offline publications, there are more
opinions and research reports /
articles than ever.
With so many media - savy fundies predicting the crash and all their ego - massaging confirmation bias
articles and neatly chosen «expert
opinions», we may not get more
than a handful of 10 % corrections for another decade and every time they happen, we will be told the sky is falling!
You would end up backtracking and clarifying your point so much; attempting to account for every possible logical path, that your point would be lost and the
article would seem more like a legal contract
than an
opinion piece.
Go buy a used 6th grade Biology textbook rather
than posting your uninformed
opinion on news
articles.
Jeremy Myers: your
article, in my
opinion, is more of a slam in Tim's face
than getting passed over by coach Rex Ryan or getting cut the way he did by coach Kelly.
And as for the Syllabus of Errors, not one
article of it mentions democracy, workers» unions or newspapers, and if it rejects «pluralism» (not a concept anyone at the time was familiar with) it is mostly in the sense that any religion which claims to be true, rather
than a matter of
opinion, rejects it.
Whatever his reasons for his
opinion he is entitled to them, as you are, and you will find probably more pro-Wenger
articles than negative ones, depending on which way the wind blows....
Every Arsenal fan will have their own
opinion about this subject, and the geeks among us will bring out an array of stats to prove that this one is better
than that one, etc, etc.... Read the full
article here
Actually winning cups getting to those finals by beating the best teams in the leagues even though we lost one to the best team in the league this year is more
than one fact and what the guy stated in the
article is a host of statistical facts and we sniffed the league in 2016 every one but us failed to beat the champions that year twice there is a host of facts that hold up success here an mostly ranting
opinions saying yea we won cups and made it to finals so what, we did nt win ecl or epl only 1 team does that and other
than Leicester which we were 2nd only city, mu and chelsea have won since we last won so not many clubs do that and totten ham hasnt won a cup since 2008 we have won 5 in 8 seasons and been to 3 other finals
I hope Spurs fans don't see this as a «lets knock Tottenham»
article, but rather see it for what it is, and perhaps come here with some enlightening
opinions, rather
than the obvious «keep your nose out of our business» type of thing.
rather
than to entertain for a moment the notion that I might have commented on the
article after reading it to contribute my
opinion (like everyone else on the message board -LSB-?]-RRB-
As an avid reader of all thing «birthy,» I have come across quite a number of
articles suggesting that birth plans are a bad idea, or in one seemingly bitter Obstetrician's
opinion — «Worse
than -LSB-...]
In particular, local media attention matters: it's often easier to get
than national coverage, it lets you leverage your local activists and it can lead to much broader distribution of your story if it gets on a newswire (even local blogs can help, since they may be disproportionately read by elected officials and other
opinion leaders and can also serve as a source for national blogs — see this
article for details).
The
article also looks at the gender imbalance in the overall news site audience (more men
than women go to news /
opinion sites) and lists the top (U.S.) online news sites.
As a 19 year old university student, its jargon like the kind that was discussed in your
article «Jargon Destroys Trust» (TP leader, March) that intimidates me and pushes me away from politics rather
than encouraging me to take part and voice my
opinion.
Order 120 (1) of the Standing Orders of the House, which is premised on
Article 106 (2) of the Constitution states that «Except as provided in Orders 119 and 112 no Bill shall be introduced unless the text of the Bill, with no variations other
than such as, in the
opinion of the Parliamentary Draftsman, are of a trivial or drafting character, has been published in the Gazette fourteen days before the date of its introduction in the House.»
Technorati places far more emphasis
than traditional news outlets on
opinion articles because bloggers seem just as likely to link to a firebrand op - ed essay as to a sober wire - service report.
Based on an analysis of existing evidence, published in an
opinion article in the Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology journal on January 20, Dr. Narod argues that to achieve a cure, rather
than simply delay progression or reoccurrence of the disease, women should be first treated with aggressive surgery to remove all clinically - detectable cancer cells, followed by targeted chemotherapy to the abdomen (intraperitoneal chemotherapy).
While I endorse this
article's
opinions and am opposed to the death penalty, I must disagree with the editors» statement that «scientific protocols for executions can not be established, because killing animal subjects for no reason other
than to see what kills them best would clearly be unethical.»
I'm familiar as a lay reader with humidity - plus - methane arguments for the PETM, for example here (not at all sure these are more
than opinions, since this was published as a letter not an
article):
Opinion articles aim to stimulate debate rather
than provide a comprehensive review of a topic.
I had a close friend (mentioned in the above
article) who had researched more heavily
than I had regarding the pine pollen tinctures / powders / tablets and I trusted his
opinion on going with the Raw Forest Foods tablets.
I believe that a well balanced diet is what we should be talking about rather
than low this and low that, again, as Phil puts it perfectly well (in my
opinion) in the conclusion of this
article, thus, ``... we can only hope it is replaced by sound and balanced style of eating that includes nourishing and metabolism - boosting dietary fats, unrefined natural carbohydrates, and healthy protein choices.
In the Esquire
article, writer Anna Peele gives her less
than flattering
opinion on the breakout star, concluding, «So yeah, he is kind of a dick.
Filed Under:
Articles and
Opinions, Movies, Samuel Brace Tagged With: DC, Less
Than Zero, Suicide Squad, the bourne identity, the bourne supremacy, the bourne ultimatum, The Dark Tower, The Shining
My
article («Where the Boys Are,» June 12, 1996) argued that, contrary to popular
opinion, it is boys rather
than girls who are on the weak side of the gender gap.
Brooke Charter Schools is listed as an example of a network of schools with far more demand
than seats available in the
opinion article «Too Much Left to Chance ``.
That slime sells a lot of books... and so your conclusions in this
article have even less relevance
than your
opinions.
I don't believe this is anything more
than my personal
opinion, you can take it for what its worth which is exactly why I stated you could prove me wrong in the
article.
This is definitely one of those
articles which should have «in my
opinion» and «my thoughts on this are» scattered throughout rather
than presenting one misguided person's
opinion as fact.
News & Notes is a weekly Saturday post featuring book - and publishing - related news, links to interesting
articles and
opinion pieces, and other cool stuff Book News Barnes & Noble fires CEO less
than a year into his tenure.
As Joe will note in his
article, I'm an advocate of much more caution about stock investing
than seems to prevail today (thanks, in my
opinion, to Wall Street marketing), and I hold what many would consider heretical views on equity investing.
This must be an
opinion article, rather
than being based on statistical evidence, because NONE of my many, many cats ever develop these dire conditions.
So Dive The World have been expelled for nothing more
than publishing an
article expressing someone else's
opinion.
we will have over 80comments regarding which console to choose even if the
article isn't biased a lot of the people here do nt even read
articles and actually just want to spout of their
opinion for no other reason
than the sake of doing so myself included:)
All in all, at least half of your
article amounts no nothing more
than «People disagree with my
opinion, so they're fucking idiots.»
By «we» you'd think there's actually more
than a troll voicing their
opinion in a half - assed
article.
All statements and / or
opinions expressed in these materials, and all
articles and responses to questions and other content, other
than the content provided by the Company, are solely the
opinions and the responsibility of the person or entity providing those materials.
I thought, rather
than look at the piece exclusively on social media and read the many
articles and comments to form my
opinion, that I would do it the old fashioned way: standing in front of the piece itself.
While the
articles are a bit more serious
than most
opinion articles, they are not the same as a peer - reviewed research
article.
But the
article goes beyond that basic conclusion and examines how this climate wiggle, with temperatures now little different
than they were in 1998 (a year made hot by an El Nino warmup of the Pacific), is playing out in the realm of policy and public
opinion.
The way to maintain control is to make a point of sending our most newsworthy scientific
articles and
opinion pieces to the journals of our own professional societies, in which the peer review process is editor - facilitated, rather
than editor - directed.
The Physics Today
article focuses on the backlash against the scientific
opinion by non-scientists, but I think that the common response is more of a yawn
than a backlash.
I actually find it MORE interesting that it didn't get mentioned at all on other news sites outside of an
opinion article or two that was little more
than a vitriolic diatribe.
In his defense, Ball argued that the
article was obviously
opinion and was mostly about climate scientists as a whole rather
than Weaver, specifically.
For example, ranking the
opinion of an academic biologist involved in the IPCC on the attribution of climate change higher
than that of a scientist from another field that has studied the issue and read all the journal
articles or an actively engaged citizen scientist that is technically educated and reading all the literature.
Across the two - year period, at least eight out of 10 news
articles at the paper reflected the consensus view, but at the
opinion pages, less
than half of
articles asserted that climate change was real and that humans were a cause.
This is the nature and limitation of representative sampling and content analysis, a technique necessary in order to analyze trends across 5 news organizations, two years, and more
than 1800 news and
opinion articles.