To further that goal, the Institute publishes Legal Writing: The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, a peer - edited Journal that provides a forum for an exchange of scholarly ideas and
opinions about legal writing.
Not exact matches
Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute
about property rights or some other
legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of
opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be
written to the apostle — who will
write this letter and what exactly will it say?
As
Legal Affairs
wrote a couple of months after the Goodridge decision, «one of the strange things
about judges is that even when they issue decisions that move the earth, they typically decline to explain how they arrived at their conclusions, thinking their
written opinions should speak for themselves.»
Every
legal researcher has come across the phrase in a judicial
opinion, «It is well settled that...,» or, «It is axiomatic that...» In 2014, I
wrote about a prototype
legal research website that mined
opinions for instances of these phrases and made them searchable as a way of helping researchers find statements of -LSB-...]
I
wrote not long ago
about Casetext, a new
legal research site that provides free access to court
opinions together with a platform for crowdsourcing references and annotations.
«[M] ost of what people take the time to
write is
legal analysis, law current events,
opinions about these things, etc.» Again, he is talking
about academics, but the point is true of a range of
legal blogs.
The purpose of this annotated Bibliography is to assist professional
legal writers in easily locating
writing about judicial
opinion writing and deciding what might be useful for them.
In addition to training externs and clerks, an upper - level class in judicial
opinion writing provides an opportunity for students to hone their skills in
writing for a particular audience, structuring and organizing, analyzing, and using rhetorical devices introduced during the first - year
writing course through a different type of document.6 Such a course can cause students to look at the
legal process from a different perspective and to become better critical readers and users of
opinions by
writing them.7 Thus, other goals of a judicial
opinion writing course can include learning
about the audiences of judicial
opinions and the perspective judges bring to their
opinion writing.
If a case is particularly difficult to follow, I often have a conversation with my students
about what aspects of the
writing made the
opinion so challenging for the reader.37 We explore questions pertaining to the
opinion's organization, its lack of a roadmap or other helpful contextual clues, its overly long paragraphs that contain multiple
legal points, or its ridiculously long sentences with numerous embedded clauses.
1 To the extent that you are not a public figure and this is not a matter of public concern, even a negligent misrepresentation
about what you actually
wrote on Facebook, that is not a statement of
opinion and is not accompanied by a reference allowing someone to confirm the accuracy of the statement at the source, could give rise to
legal liability on the part of the person giving the tip.
In the course of updating an article I
wrote last year
about legal - ethics resources on the Web, I came across Ethics and Lawyering Today, a monthly electronic newsletter highlighting important new cases, ethics
opinions, and other developments, often with links to full text documents.
It was one year ago that I first
wrote here
about Casetext, the free
legal research site that uses «crowdsourcing» to annotate court
opinions.
An attorney of law firm may not include, on a website or other advertisement, a quotation or excerpt from a court
opinion (oral or
written)
about the attorney's abilities or
legal services.
As US law professor Ellie Margolis observes, «It is almost impossible to imagine a researcher finding relevant information, thinking
about how it might affect the analysis in a piece of
legal writing, be it
opinion or brief, and then not using it to enhance the document.»
Heather has been a frequent presenter at
legal industry conferences since 2001, a marketing
opinion columnist with Lexpert since 2010, and LexisNexis since 2014, and
writes about how to thrive in the changing
legal market at heathersuttie.ca.
As someone who works with both lawyers and judges for a living, I was particularly struck by his harsh words
about legal -
writing courses for law students and
opinion -
writing training for judges.
Other popular
legal technology blogs to consider include: 1) Future Lawyer,
written by the always - knowledgable Florida litigator Rick Georges; 2) Technologist, a group blog; 3) Divorce Discourse, where attorney Lee Rosen shares technology and law practice management advice; 4) Law Practice Tips, a blog chock full of wisdom from Jim Calloway, an attorney and the Director of the Oklahoma Bar Association's Management Assistance Program; 5) iPhone JD, where attorney Jeff Richardson covers all things Apple - related, including iPhones and iPads; 6) Ride the Lightening, which covers a variety of interesting
legal technology issues and is authored by lawyer Sharon Nelson, who offers her
opinion on the effect of
legal technology on the practice of law; and 7) the MyCase blog, where I regularly
write about a host of
legal tech issues.
The
opinion I'm
about to render has no
legal value, could well be challenged, should not be relied upon and, please, I beg you, don't
write letters.