Sentences with phrase «opinions of actual people»

(So, it's not necessarily the opinions of actual people as much as the opinions of actual politicians.)

Your political model needs to account for the existence and opinions of actual people.

Not exact matches

Since I don't think of an embryo as being an equivalent to an actual person (my opinion, yours may vary), I would probably have chosen an abortion if the situation had come up.

Julie McMahon has communicated some actual facts (you know, the type that can be backed up by court records and such) and people have expressed their opinion on the basis of those facts.

If you look at the actual segment of people who slavishly follow his show, compared to not only the rest of this nation but of a global audience related to all things papal, then there is no justification for promoting his opinion as if it mattered.

It would thus be contended that, for example, while the actual occurrence of pain, suffering, disappointment (etc.) may be extra-theoretical, nevertheless a person's awareness of such things is not, but rather lies only in the area of belief — of mere opinion.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

In the Old Testament, however, the actual practice of worshiping ancestors had been so far overpassed that while one first rate scholar says, «There is a growing consensus of opinion that the Hebrews, like all other peoples at a certain stage of thought, worshipped these spirits,» (Henry Preserved Smith: The Religion of Israel, p. 25) another first - rate scholar says, «The alleged indications of Ancestor Worship are all exposed to more or less serious objections.»

The first and most glaring assumption that «scholarly» people often make is that somehow their opinion is always the right one which begins a «philosophical» debate rather than actual «Theological» discussion, especially when it comes to matters of religion and biblical facts.

The Gospels, however, are of the opinion that what happened to an actual person on Golgotha is a religious concern of the first order.

I know many people will have different reasons or opinions as to why we lost yesterday but am not here to form the «know it all» and claim to know the actual cause of the loss.

While he lacks respect by the people, he enjoys a lot of respect by other politicians, and even though he has no actual say on politics, his opinion is valued by them.

«Contributions to candidates for city office from persons with a particularly direct financial interest in these officials» policy decisions pose a heightened risk of actual and apparent corruption, and merit heightened government regulations,» the opinion by judges Debra Livingston, Guido Calabresi and Paul Crotty said.

I'm not suggesting that DeBlasio's use of social media played into this upset (more likely it was a hidden indicator of his actual level of support from hard - core political activists, vs people responding to a public opinion poll).

It's definitely nice to let the actual market determine the success of our work instead of a semi-informed opinion of one or a handful of people.

I am starting of as author and beginning to write my first book.I heard someone say if writing an actual story whether it be myself and other people I really know in the book.To have everyone sign a legal document type thing by lawyer giving permission to use peoples real names.so as to avoid any lawsuit that may occur with the book.and is it best to use a pen name for myself and made up name for actual people being included in the book.what would your opinion be on legel grounds safer to use made up names.thank you

When these opinions are vented, expressed to their peers in person via word - of - mouth, or online in the form of social media status updates, blog posts, and (even more critically) as reviews on your actual sales page, it directly affects the overall conventional opinion of your work, and whether or not a new buyer will make the decision to buy your work.

Normal people will be buying your book, so the opinions of your family and friends are likely to represent what your actual target audience will feel.

When I talk to people about climate change (and the one time that I gave a talk on climate change at a physics colloquium), I always like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even with that background I still am not arrogant enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent opinion on the subject.

The fact is, most people really don't know what the actual climate change issue is, let alone know a lot of detailed, accurate information about it, so all these strong «opinions» — most at odds with the the assertions of the scientists in directly related fields who professionally study this issue — is another indicator that bias and desire and an enormous host of misinformation drives perception on this issue.

That is, most people form their opinions on the basis of what they think the majority of their peers are saying, or what supposed opinion leaders think, or whatever but not by excluding everything except the actual evidence.

«What sort of feminism is it that faults people for asking actual women about their experiences, and for trying to start a public conversation in which women's opinions are actively solicited, on the grounds that the questioner should instead have gone to the library or taken up the time of his colleagues?»

question, the only truthful answer must be «no», since colour perception is both limited and biased, as well as the actual colour being a matter of opinion (viz, reasonable people can disagree).

For all that, it is well beyond my areas of competence, interest and experience to having anything meaningful to say about the actual practice of law and such opinions as are expressed relate only to the issue of law publishing and the provision of information to and for people with interests in law.