Sentences with phrase «opinions on attribution»

Please note, The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum does not authenticate or offer opinions on attribution.

Not exact matches

But customers trust Amazon to provide objective opinions about a product or a brand... we will work hard to show that there is some attribution to that level of investment that drives business results, even if it doesn't happen on Amazon,» Dallaire said

I realized that it's necessary for realclimate to rebut arguments refuting the AGW crowd, in order to remain the leading site (in my opinion), on attribution.

In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them on the subject, such as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his opinion before submitting it to the conference).

I'm insufficiently up to speed on the IPCC's attribution argument to venture an opinion on it.

Do you believe that IPCC has correctly represented the scientific consensus on the attribution question and that the consensus is wrong, or do you believe to the contrary that IPCC has not correctly represented the consensus on the attribution question and that your opinion is in the scientific mainstream?

For example, ranking the opinion of an academic biologist involved in the IPCC on the attribution of climate change higher than that of a scientist from another field that has studied the issue and read all the journal articles or an actively engaged citizen scientist that is technically educated and reading all the literature.

The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO2 levels).»

The authors note that Oreskes» methodology is further flawed because it also surveyed the opinions and writings of «nonscientists who may write about climate, but are by no means experts on or even casually familiar with the science dealing with attribution — that is, attributing a specific climate effect (such as a temperature increase) to a specific cause (such as rising CO

assumption that to have an opinion on AGW, you need to have a crisp attribution statement.

I remember exchanging comments with Willis on more than one occasion, where I explained to him that his confidence in his theory of attribution for public opinion on climate change seemed ill - founded.