Any discussion about life insurance as an investment after you retire is certain to draw strong
opinions on both sides of the argument.
Not exact matches
It means deciding what one believes not by conforming to fashionable
opinions, but by taking the trouble to learn and honestly consider the strongest
arguments to be advanced
on both or all
sides of questions — including
arguments for positions that others revile and want to stigmatize and against positions others seek to immunize from critical scrutiny.»
Opinion on whether HS2 is a good or bad idea is divided to say the very least, and I don't propose to go into the
arguments here although for the sake
of full disclosure, I'm
on the
side of the antis, but it did annoy me that many people who were protesting that it would have a devastating effect
on their lives were waved away with the flick
of a railway engineer's hand.
The
arguments surrounding global warming have become so polarised that in my
opinion there is no longer a genuine attempt to get to the truth through orignial research, but simply a process
of point scoring by either
side going
on.
I don't speak much about the topic because
opinions are so strong
on every
side of the
argument.
In addition, in your argumentative essay papers
on privacy rights you need to analyze both
sides of the
argument but eventually lead the reader to accept your
opinion on the issue.
I've been reading a number
of opinions on both
sides, both
of which have
arguments of merit.
I think, had Exxon continued in that role, there might not be such a cacophony
of anti-climate
arguments that are ongoing now because there would have been somebody at the table who came from the
side of fossil fuel use and would have been shown to be a leader in terms
of the science and this was their reasoned
opinion as to what was going
on.
In my
opinion the discovery process
of a court case would be illuminating, because we would finally get to see all the data
on both
sides of the
argument.
I didn't find my
opinions changed, but I did find that there are wildy varying
opinions presented as fact
on both
sides of the
argument.
I'm not convinced about the other
side of his
argument — an overemphasis
on CO2 in the policy guides — but, irrespective
of your
opinion of his political inclinations, it is important to give due respect to someone who argues outside the box, dares to challenge convention and has the courage to be unfashionable.
Let's not pre-judge anyone prior to their having a chance to hear different
sides of the discussion, but give speakers the benefit
of the doubt for having honest conviction and
opinion and remaining open minded enough to consider
argument on its merits.
I'm usually able to see both
sides of an
argument, but here, honestly, I just can not understand the logic
of the other
side given the pervasive utilization in the legal profession
of junior colleagues to write judicial
opinions, briefs, motions, articles, letters, etc.
on which senior folks sign off.
While most
of the curriculum at Harvard during this time consisted
of lecture and student recitation, skills development was also provided in the form
of weekly moot courts, during which students argued questions
of law before professors and submitted occasional written disputations
on legal subjects.121 Although Stearns had previously used moot courts in his teaching at Harvard, Story and Ashmun refined them.122 Cases were handed out the week before
argument, and two counsel were assigned to each
side.123 The cases would then be argued the next Friday, with the other students taking notes
of the
argument; the professor in charge that week would issue a written
opinion.124
Did CJ Roberts» vote for defendant Cunningham at the Justices» private conference right after oral
argument and then assign the
opinion Justice Ginsburg OR was CJ Roberts» initially with the dissent until he saw that the majority
opinion had the weight
of nearly all recent precedents
on its
side?