By asking enough economists or investment managers you will find as many different
opinions on the subject as would care to, no doubt many of them conflicting.
One one hand I'd like to share
my opinion on the subject as a gamer, as a woman and as a journalist.
Not exact matches
Keep in mind that any
opinion or position disclosed
on this platform is
subject to change at any moment
as the thesis evolves.
It shall be unlawful for any broker, dealer, or exchange, directly or indirectly, to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce for the purpose of using any facility of an exchange within or
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any transaction in a security, or to report any such transaction, unless such exchange (1) is registered
as a national securities exchange under section 6 of this title, or (2) is exempted from such registration upon application by the exchange because, in the
opinion of the Commission, by reason of the limited volume of transactions effected
on such exchange, it is not practicable and not necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors to require such registration
Opinions and estimates expressed
on this site constitute Phoenix Capital Research's judgment
as of the date appearing
on the
opinion or estimate and are
subject to change without notice.
Ironicus, you can consider me a friend up to the point when you start infringing
on MY rights to perform my duties, and begin attempting to express your
opinion about a
subject on which you are not well - educated in such a way
as to pretend you have authority in that arena.
For the sake of those who do make the effort to attend, and
as a reminder that the obligation to worship is imposed
on us by God himself and is not
subject to our convenience, it is my
opinion that this universally unpopular change should be reversed forthwith.»
In addition,
as I have stated before, I do not teach and I can not understand why you believe offering an
opinion on a
subject is teaching.
Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the
subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of
opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes
as well
as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..
Others, while more like blogs, are just
as credible
as what some guy posts in the message board section of an
opinion piece
on the
subject of religion.
I refuse to read the article based
on the premise of the
subject line and especially given divisive nature of how CNN is / has been conducting itself
as the so - called purveyor of truth especially int he field of religion which it knows nothing about but instead, chooses to try to sway readers»
opinions based
on a very secularist or antagonistic approach.
Then separate them and ask them to write their
opinion on only one controversial
subject, such
as the meaning of life.
The truth is, we think that a great many people in this country are basically pro-life, but lack the courage of their convictions either because they can't articulate their thoughts
on the
subject as they would like, or because they don't think they have the right to state their
opinions in public.
We also commonly speak of someone being an authority
on a certain
subject, meaning that he or she is recognized
as an accepted source of expert
opinion in that area.
During my week without
opinions, we touched briefly
on the
subject of health care, a
subject of tremendous importance to me personally and a
subject of much debate and scrutiny
as congress works through various proposals for reform.
She has put in a lot more time
on this
subject than any of us, and her
opinion should be respected
as such.
I have largely stayed away from commenting
on these
as you have made your
opinions well known
on the
subject of Bell, and I don't really care to debate the
subject anymore, I just find the titling of the pieces off putting.
If you are reading, can you give me your
opinion, it is the only
opinion I trust
on the
subject,
as to whether you think it is likely to be true that Arsenal's wage bil is forty per cent higher than spuds?
«The fact that the decision to release was taken by the Scottish justice secretary does not preclude you,
as the prime minister of the United Kingdom, from now expressing your
opinion on a
subject that is of great public concern, and which affects Britain's international reputation and our relations with our allies,» he wrote.
We then asked Freeman, of the state Committee
on Open Government, for an advisory
opinion as to whether Fort Schuyler was
subject to the FOI Law.
«I feel very privileged to be able to articulate my positions and my
opinions on a myriad of
subjects, and now I've been encouraged by many people in the general public,
as well
as Democratic funders and high level elected officials
on both sides of the party line to seriously consider running,» the former star of «The Nanny» told reporters at the National Press Club in Washington.
As much as we have been taught in saner climes to respect opinions of persons on the other swing of subject matters, I am compelled to break my silence just so I can bring a few things to your attentio
As much
as we have been taught in saner climes to respect opinions of persons on the other swing of subject matters, I am compelled to break my silence just so I can bring a few things to your attentio
as we have been taught in saner climes to respect
opinions of persons
on the other swing of
subject matters, I am compelled to break my silence just so I can bring a few things to your attention.
And I was not dissapointed by how clear cut his
opinion was
on the
subject... In his article evidence
on nut consumption and human health he goes so far
as to call Dr. Esselstyn a reductionist for dissaproving the healthy fats from nuts and advocado's!
One notorious line in the film Cruel Intentions refers to the email format
as the last bastion of «social recluses,» and numerous other media have lampooned the process of online dating at one time or another.Needless to say, times have changed, and
opinions on this
subject have shifted dramatically.
Students can make great use of this website by creating their own distinct ideology,
as it provide various
opinions on one
subject.
The director seems
as aware
as anyone else of the irony that the worlds biggest, most corporate football club are taking a central role in his first film
on the
subject, but he never lets these
opinions interfere with his story and characters.
Creating wall - sized portraits of locals
as they travel from town to town, the two inquisitive, kindred - spirit directors peer into the day - to - day life of rural and working - class France, the camera listening and learning
as old and middle - aged villagers remember how coal miners used to bathe and eat back in the day or goat - cheese makers give their differing
opinions on the
subject of dehorning.
But it is starting to feel
as though — much like authors whose books are maliciously reviewed — I'm the one who is not entitled to an
opinion on the very
subject I covered.
You should always look
on your
opinions as tentative and
subject to continual review, in light of any new information that comes along.
It's always good to hear others»
opinions on various
subjects and
as you said, balance is always key!
So instead of just giving our
opinion on the
subject, we thought that we would ask twelve other bloggers (who travel
as a couple) to contribute!
Students can make great use of this website by creating their own distinct ideology,
as it provide various
opinions on one
subject.
As ever, St. John has
opinions on the
subject.
It's one of those games that I foresee having one of three effects; you're either going to find the concept itself fascinating and thus appreciate the game
as a piece of interactive art regardless of your actual
opinion about the art itself; you're going to connect with the game
on a personal level thanks to its
subject matter, or you're going to be bloody baffled by the entire thing and demand a refund at the end.
Our CEO, Vanessa Fernandez, gathered some
opinions from Facebook
on the
subject, and
as we have been seeing around the internet since Titanfall 2 was announced, reactions were also VERY mixed among her friends and followers.
So Game Maker just got bought by a gambling company, and
as the ancients have foretold, the gnarled old Lars has duly appeared from his hermitage with semi-inflammatory
opinions on the
subject: XNA: abandoned.
I often wheel out this
subject with my students
as it makes great debating material, and I would be interested to hear any
opinions on this issue.
As others have advised, educate yourself
on the
subject so that you can form your own
opinion about which arguments and which sources are more plausible.
In this case, the committee might have discovered more than a few papers by one of them
on the
subject, such
as Risbey and Kandlikar (2002) «Expert Assessment of Uncertainties in Detection and Attribution of Climate Change» in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, or that Prof. Risbey was a faculty member in Granger Morgan's Engineering and Public Policy department at CMU for five years, a place awash in expert elicitation of climate (I sent my abstract to Prof. Morgan — who I know from my AGU uncertainty quantification days — for his
opinion before submitting it to the conference).
Can you imagine if you were able to pick a
subject you knew absolutely nothing about, write a batshit crazy
opinion piece
on it, and get it published in The New York Times
as easily
as a stoned college student calls in for a bucket of chicken wings?
I have not been satisfied
as to the science, or the integrity of the people involved in the science promoting AGW and
as I regularly poll others for their
opinions on these and other
subjects I find it accurate to state that we need further investigation into the integrity of those involved in promoting AGW.
Judith has claimed expertise by virtue of appointing herself to make authoritative claims
as to who can and can't «responsibly» claim «expertise» that merits involvement in public discussions that have policy implications (
as well
as, btw, appointing herself
as an authority
on decision - making in the face of uncertainty), and that her
opinions should be stamped with the authority of a «expert» because she has written some blog posts
on the
subject.
Yet we have commenters — most — commenting
on it who don't understand this (or don't want ot, or their skepticism is getting in the way of even being able to intelligently entertain the idea) yet who are profession
opinions routinely
on this site
as if they have more knowledge
on the
subject than the world's leading climate scientists, or are simply better scientists than them.
In the interests of remaining
on topic, I'll just note (
as many others have) that public policy decisions are driven by the information available, that
on complex
subjects we depend upon expert
opinion, and that due to some rather serious efforts by «skeptics» there is a gap between the expert
opinion and the public perception of the same.
In this post we will examine the claims made by Giaever in his talk, and show that his contrarian climate
opinions come from a position of extreme ignorance
on the
subject,
as Giaever admits.
See Brugger, supra n. 141, at 647 (stating that while Tucker's moot court was «no innovation in legal training,» Tucker enjoyed using it); Butler, supra n. 143, at 29 (stating that «with the higher view of preparing students for speaking and writing
on legal
subjects, it will be useful to exercise their minds by forensic debates in moot courts, and by requiring from them written
opinions on questions of law, and readings and dissertations
on statutes and other themes,
as circumstances permit»); Laub, supra n. 144, at 14 (quoting Reed's letter to the Dickinson College Trustees
on a course of study); Barrow, supra n. 148, at 289.
Opinions on this
subject differ widely, so
as part of this week's Your Thoughts Lawyer monthly reached out to a number of experts in the field, but in the UK and beyond, to hear what they had to say.
Nevertheless, he took the opportunity to elaborate
on the PMOI standard of review and raised the question
as to whether intelligence analyses and sources should be
subject to the EU courts at all and «whether, in a system based largely
on the confidence which the EU institutions place in the evaluation conducted by the competent national authorities of the seriousness of the evidence or clues to support a freezing measure, an intensive review of that evidence by the EU judicature is in fact appropriate» (
Opinion para. 66).
The sources of the blogs vary from new
on the Web, proprietary sources
on the hidden web, jury verdicts, court
opinions, reports by government and nongovernmental organizations around the globe
as well
as fun stuff such
as trivia questions about products that are the
subject of trade secrets.»
It would also include experts retained by a non-party to the litigation (for example, statutory accident benefits («SABS») insurers), who form
opinions based
on personal observations or examinations relating to the
subject matter of the litigation for a purpose other than the litigation (referred to in these reasons
as «non-party experts»).