However, these amendments, leftover relics of discrimination from more than 100 years ago when a surge of Catholic immigrants caused some to worry about their religious influence in what was then Protestant public schools, continue to be used by
opponents of school choice as whips against policymakers who have no interest in inviting litigation.
Not exact matches
As Robin Lake recently wrote: «Given the largely successful push by teachers unions and other opponents of public school choice to brand charter schools as a conservative, partisan issue, the last thing public charter schools need is to have the next president feed the «end of public education» narrative.&raqu
As Robin Lake recently wrote: «Given the largely successful push by teachers unions and other
opponents of public
school choice to brand charter
schools as a conservative, partisan issue, the last thing public charter schools need is to have the next president feed the «end of public education» narrative.&raqu
as a conservative, partisan issue, the last thing public charter
schools need is to have the next president feed the «end
of public education» narrative.»
Of course, whether educational preferences based on demographics or dissatisfaction with existing school performance manifest themselves in support for charter schools depends on other circumstances as well: notably, the political power of opponents to charter schools, the most prominent opponents being teachers unions; and the degree of school choice already available to parent
Of course, whether educational preferences based on demographics or dissatisfaction with existing
school performance manifest themselves in support for charter
schools depends on other circumstances
as well: notably, the political power
of opponents to charter schools, the most prominent opponents being teachers unions; and the degree of school choice already available to parent
of opponents to charter
schools, the most prominent
opponents being teachers unions; and the degree
of school choice already available to parent
of school choice already available to parents.
Choice does not preclude working for fundamental change in public
school systems, nor does it necessarily equate with an unlimited endorsement
of «privatization,»
as opponents frequently charge.
Given the largely successful push by teachers unions and other
opponents of public
school choice to brand charter
schools as a conservative, partisan issue, the last thing public charter
schools need is to have the next president feed the «end
of public education» narrative.
Last week, several news outlets circulated a report by the U.S. Department
of Education's research division that found negative results for students who participated in the District
of Columbia's Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP), the only private
school choice program for low - income children in Washington, D.C. Predictably,
opponents of school choice descended on the report to tout it
as evidence that
school choice does not work.
Such quotes were bound to circulate among education reformers and give traditional
opponents of school choice, such
as teachers unions, heartburn.
School choice opponents have seized on these findings
as evidence that these programs are ineffective and even harmful while advocates point out that Louisiana is heavily regulated, the first few years
of an evaluation tell only the worst part
of a story (i.e. there are transition effects), and that we should be careful about a heavy - handed focus on test scores.
In his book, Bolick describes how he helped orchestrate the mainstream media's first use
of civil rights language in defense
of school choice while discrediting a voucher
opponent as «blocking the schoolhouse door to minority children.»
Abbott's
opponent claimed he was in support
of vouchers; however, Abbott stated his focus is on public
school choice, such
as charter
schools.
Evers is largely supported by public
school advocates and Democrats while Holtz is running
as a conservative
choice, appealing to
school voucher supporters and
opponents of the Common Core State Standards.
Seen by her supporters
as a tireless, driven supporter
of school choice,
opponents say she is the most ideological and anti-public education nominee ever to be put forward to run the the nearly 40 - year - old department.
Lunedar Girault, a Newark public charter
school parent, said: «I challenge
opponents of public charter
schools to come to my city and see firsthand how limiting my
choices as a parent impacts my children.
Colorado and Missouri are among 39 states that have strict prohibitions on public funds» going to religious
schools, known
as Blaine Amendments, which voucher advocates consider the last line
of defense for
opponents of private
school choice.
Opponents of this change decry it
as a win for
school choice and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.
As is so often the case, the most vocal
opponents of federal
school choice are right for the wrong reasons.
As a large number of New Hampshire's nonpublic schools are religious, opponents of school choice have challenged the program under, among other things, an 1877 amendment to the state constitution frequently referred to as a Blaine Amendmen
As a large number
of New Hampshire's nonpublic
schools are religious,
opponents of school choice have challenged the program under, among other things, an 1877 amendment to the state constitution frequently referred to
as a Blaine Amendmen
as a Blaine Amendment.
But
as with the Blaine amendments,
as I said, these can be construed — they don't have to be, and frequently have not been, but they can be construed — in just the same way that the
opponents of parental
choice programs wanted the federal Establishment Clause construed, and would like the Blaine amendments construed, namely, to apply to assistance to families that use that assistance to attend a religious
school, in a free and independent
choice.