Sentences with phrase «opponents say»

Opponents say the project will include 1.1 million square feet, which is more than the NJSEA is allowed to build on the site and a violation of the ground lease agreement.

Opponents say it's a matter of the haves versus the have - nots.

«You'll hear opponents say, «You'll turn them into suitcase kids; they don't want to be dragged back and forth,»» Dr. Holstein says.

Abortion opponents say the videos show the organization is illegally harvesting and selling organs.

Opponents say the licenses create a security risk by potentially providing illegal immigrants with ease of access to secure buildings and other privileges.

Opponents say credit - based insurance rates are unfair because they largely and negatively affect low - income drivers.

Opponents say more dollars are needed overall to pay for indigent defense.»

Texas, West Virginia, and 22 other states have filed a lawsuit to challenge an Obama Administration rule that opponents say radically restructures the way electricity is produced and consumed in the United States.

But opponents say it is a costly ($ 1.76 Billion AUD) experiment, especially as it will require a large amount of energy to run.

Opponents say the proposed $ 5.4 billion pipeline would be a catalyst to unlocking oil sands development in Alberta, Canada, where a dense, sticky hydrocarbon called bitumen is harvested by strip - mining and energy - intense steam - based techniques.

Opponents say a presidential rejection of the project would send a powerful message to the world about the importance of moving away from fossil fuels and make it more difficult for Canada to export its energy - intensive oil.

Opponents say, «We can not stress strongly enough how dangerously misguided this application is.»

Since the implementation of wind farms in the 1970s, opponents say that bird and bat deaths, as well as noise pollution, environmental damage and poor aesthetics are not worth the potential benefits.

Opponents say this wording makes the Clean Power Plan invalid, since the EPA has long regulated mercury emissions from power plants under Section 112.

Opponents say a unique landscape or seascape is being overshadowed, to the detriment of tourists and residents alike.

Opponents say the EPA is evading accountability.

As a libertarian voter I can assure you that most of what our opponents say about each other is true.

Eversource opponents say the demand charge will compromise Massachusetts» rooftop solar value proposition and significantly disrupt 2017's fifth biggest U.S. residential solar market.

Opponents say it will foster the development of Alberta's oil sands, which will in turn emit more heat - trapping carbon dioxide when burned and thus exacerbate global warming.

Opponents say the increase in coal train traffic, air pollution and damage to waterways and other ecosystems would outstrip any economic benefits.

A bill in the South Carolina Senate, S. 936, seeks to restrict dog hunting to land with 1000 acres or more, a law opponents say will cause an already diminishing pastime to disappear.

Opponents say the cat population can be reduced without killing cats by trapping and taking them to veterinarians who neuter them and give them vaccinations, either free or at reduced cost.

Opponents say that criticism of breeders is overblown and that if the trend of outlawing commercial breeders continues, people won't have access to popular breeds.

Many sub-prime loans include prepayment penalties, which opponents say target the poor, who usually are the ones with subprime loans.

Opponents say independent charter schools drain sorely needed tax dollars from traditional public schools.

Advocates argue the measure empowers parents to get involved and find solutions, while opponents say it will open the door to charter companies looking to make a profit.

But opponents say Mr. Obama's attempt to reward states that adopt the standards with grants and waivers amounts to a backdoor grab for federal control over what is taught in schools.

But some opponents say students shouldn't have access to charter schools at all, arguing they siphon critical funds away from school districts.

School choice opponents say that «choice» not only siphons resources from traditional systems but also promotes segregation, discriminates against students with the most severe disabilities, and fights against public oversight.

Seen by her supporters as a tireless, driven supporter of school choice, opponents say she is the most ideological and anti-public education nominee ever to be put forward to run the the nearly 40 - year - old department.

Opponents say the state's current charter system works well.

Opponents say it would eviscerate collective bargaining, gut public pensions and obliterate guaranteed retirements across the board.»

But, opponents say the new rules will lead to an expansion of charter schools that will draw money away from traditional public schools and lead to more segregation in school districts.

Opponents say this practice lacks creativity and can hinder a student's overall learning potential.

And state law, which only bars discrimination in participating schools based on race, color or national origin — the federal Title VI standard — falls short of what's necessary, opponents say.

Charter - school opponents say they fear the schools will drain public resources and benefit only wealthy children.

Opponents say charters siphon away needed resources from traditional public schools.

Opponents say that the lottery system is not fair for many students wishing to gain access.

Opponents say charter schools aren't held to the same accountability standards, don't receive sufficient oversight and drain precious public tax dollars away from public schools.

Opponents say the schools, legal in 41 states, have a spotty track record and drain resources from hard - pressed mainstream schools.

Opponents say comparing schools in this way is too crude a measure of a school's quality, achievements and character.

Opponents say local authorities are forced to use their government education grant to clear the debts.

Opponents say such «data - driven instruction» simply masks schools» teaching to standardized tests.

Charter schools also don't have to provide transportation or federally - funded free or reduced lunches for impoverished students, opponents say.

But opponents say the school grades are unfair and cause schools to needlessly be labeled as failures.

Opponents say that the bill could lead to future state takeovers of other schools and would disenfranchise voters who have elected school boards.

Opponents say charter schools will take money away from existing public schools at a time when resources are scarce.

Voucher advocates say not enough people know about the program; opponents say Ohioans are happy with the options provided by the public school system.

But opponents say charter schools will take resources from existing public schools and that the Legislature ignored the will of voters when it approved charter schools earlier this year.

Indiana lawmakers sent a lengthy piece of education legislation to Gov. Mike Pence's desk late Friday night which, Common Core opponents say, throws the brakes on implementation of the nationally - crafted academic standards in the state's classrooms.