The people that
oppose block size increase want to keep bitcoin on the fringe... and not mainstream.
Not exact matches
Although, this shouldn't be too surprising as the
block size debate is known to be one of the most controversial topics within bitcoin circles — with bitcoiners positioning themselves around two major camps: supporters of bigger
blocks for the purpose of scaling and those who
oppose bigger
blocks because of centralization concerns.
The bottom line here is, while having two
opposing communities, Reddit Bitcoin and Reddit BTC (pro big
block size), enables better communication amongst users and developers in the bitcoin industry, both groups must take necessary steps to evaluate each other's proposals and software before criticising them.
Roger Ver starts off by saying «just continuing the existing approach of increasing
block sizes is the safe path,» as
opposed to letting fees skyrocket to unusable levels.
nChain
opposes SegWit and instead supports removing the Bitcoin blockchain's artificial
block size limit (temporarily set at 1 MB) to fuel increased scalability.
There was a lot of debate around how to solve this problem, and that led to a split between two groups with
opposing viewpoints: those in favor of increasing the
size of
blocks in the blockchain versus those in favor of restructuring the way data was stored in the existing
blocks.
Bitcoin Classic was a hard fork project that offered an alternative vision of the scaling problem,
opposing to the implementation of the Lightning Network solution instead of supporting the
block size limit increase.
Furthermore, the
block size will be increased to four mb, as
opposed to the original two mb proposition by the original SegWit2x developers.
These two options, although close in popularity, differ greatly from one another and represent the
opposing sides of the ongoing
block size debate.
Segments of the Bitcoin community, and in particular some major miners,
opposed the upgrade or wanted a
block size limit increase hard fork as part of the deal for activation.
This could be Bitcoin's biggest risk yet of a network split, as a significant part of the Bitcoin community (and nearly the entire Bitcoin Core development team, who were not invited to the SegWit2x meeting) remain strongly
opposed to the SegWit2x plan as a whole, and especially to the 2 MB
block size limit increase.
One faction of the community wants to increase Bitcoin's
block size to shorten transaction times, while another is
opposed.