Both of those are the reasons
I oppose dog laws that take the «lazy way out» by targeting dogs based on real or perceived breed rather than -LSB-...]
Not exact matches
Oklahoma Pet Professionals, an organization which represents many high volume USDA
dog breeders,
opposes the
law although the
law now mandates premise standards which they are already compelled to meet.
Backers of increased restrictions on
dog breeders in North Carolina recorded a conversation with a state Senator who
opposes the bill at a meeting earlier this month and, as a result, some Republican leaders say there will be no vote on a proposed puppy mill
law this year.
GRCA
opposes mandatory spay / neuter legislation because: 1) there is no evidence to suggest that it is effective in achieving its stated goal; 2) it causes well - documented health and developmental problems in some pets, especially when performed before sexual maturity; 3) it pushes responsible breeders out of the licensing system; 4) it reduces the availability of well - bred healthy, home bred and raised puppies; 5) it encourages the importation of puppies and
dogs from less acceptable sources, including foreign countries; and 6) because
laws that force owners to perform surgery on their pets without a rational basis for doing so may be unconstitutional.
We also support reasonable
laws to protect the public from dangerous
dogs and
oppose breed - specific legislation in any form.
GRCA
opposes pet limit
laws, recognizing that it isn't the number of
dogs one owns that determines the quality of care they receive.
Puppy mill breeding
dogs are considered «livestock» and thus cruelty
laws differ for them as
oppose to our companion cats and
dogs.
Both publish magazines; train judges; support
dog health research; attempt to assure the integrity of their registries; work for reasonable
laws to protect
dogs and
dog owners;
oppose unreasonable
laws that target
dog breeds and numbers and restrict breeding; allow affiliated clubs to host shows and trials; and work with breed clubs to establish and maintain standards by which the breeds can be judged.
Do you support or
oppose a
law in Florida that would require the regulation of large - scale commercial
dog breeders?
Every mainstream national organization that is involved in canine / human interactions is
opposed to
laws targeting specific breeds of
dogs.
PETA supports the ban If the only group still standing behind a
law is the same one that has compared
dog breeders to Hitler and meat production to Jim Crow - era lynching, and routinely exploited the Holocaust to bully people into vegetarianism, you should
oppose that
law by definition.
The ASPCA
opposes «dangerous
dog laws» that designate specific breeds of
dog as «dangerous,» «vicious» or potentially «dangerous» or «vicious» without regard to the temperament or behavior of the individual
dog.
The APDT
opposes any
law that deems a
dog as dangerous or vicious based on appearance, breed or phenotype.
NAIA
opposes laws that target these problems by attempting to restrict or ban breeding or penalize responsible owners of intact
dogs and cats.
NAIA supports reasonable
laws to protect the public from dangerous
dogs and
opposes breed - specific legislation in any form.
In February 2018, Michigan Pet Fund Alliance board of directors approved a position statement
opposing any proposed legislation,
law, policy or protocol that would discriminate against a
dog or cat based upon its appearance, perceived breed or history.
The ASPCA is
opposed to
laws that ban or discriminate against specific
dog breeds or breed mixes without regard to the temperament and behavior of individual
dogs.
Therefore, the Yakima Humane Society
opposes laws that prohibit or restrict the ownership of
dogs based on breed and will strive to educate the public on responsible pet ownership and the ineffectiveness of such
laws.
«Rescue Village stands firmly
opposed to inhumane treatment of all animals and works for the day when
dog auctions are banned and puppy - mill type breeding is regulated by
laws which prevent abuse, cruelty and neglect.»
The vote on H.B. 2525, the comprehensive overhaul to the
Dog Law as it applies to commercial dog breeders, was 181 in favor with just 17 oppos
Dog Law as it applies to commercial
dog breeders, was 181 in favor with just 17 oppos
dog breeders, was 181 in favor with just 17
opposed.
Opponents of the ban have argued that the
law should focus on irresponsible
dog owners as
opposed to specific breeds.
However, the ASPCA
opposes laws that ban specific breeds of
dogs or that discriminate against particular breeds.»
While the movement to
oppose laws targeting specific breeds is being led by national organizations of
dog trainers, and veterinarians, shelter workers, of animal control officers, etc, one of the leaders of the «ban them» movement is calling people «irrational» and «out of touch» for not wanting
dogs to be shot behind the barn.
«HSUS
opposes laws and ordinances aimed at forbidding or regulating
dog ownership based solely on breed or type of
dog.