I've been a democrat for all of four months now, and what has surprised me the most is how passionately conservative evangelicals
oppose social reforms that benefit the poor.
Not exact matches
But according to Senator Gavin Marshall, chairman of the «Left federal parliamentary Labor Party caucus,» writing in The Age, Gillard's decision to allow a «conscience vote» on «gay marriage» is «not democratic,» because it «exposes individual parliamentarians to powerful conservative lobby groups» and the retrograde opinions of those «stubbornly
opposed to all
social reforms.»
It means the party's pro- and anti-NHS
reform forces have effectively cancelled each other out and that the party now neither supports nor
opposes the health and
social care bill.
In the meantime, to those Tom Harris charcaters in the Labour party who want to present electoral
reform as an issue of relevance only to bourgeois liberal Guardian - readers (like me), I say: how dare you
oppose a system that — on the evidence of Soskice and Iversen's study — is better for
social spending and economic equality?
During the General Strike of 1926 the party
opposed the general strike, arguing that the best way to achieve
social reforms was through the ballot box.
When Liberals next claim that they care more than you, remind them that their party
opposed almost every
social reform introduced by those very same one nation conservatives.
During the same period it has
opposed, delayed and sought to reject almost all of the steps taken by former Labour governments to introduce
social reforms, from the inception of the NHS to any changes to the House of Lords itself.
De Blasio's full - court press for universal pre-K and added
social services has backing from the teachers and principals unions, which
oppose many of Cuomo's
reforms.
So, for example, the sorts of
reforms Lisa and I might favor are likely to be
opposed by the very teacher educators currently overemphasizing (in our view)
social justice at the expense of pedagogy.
Don't tell me the elderly put the interest of coming generations ahead of their own, because if they did, they wouldn't be so
opposed to
reforms in
Social Security.
At the same time, I
oppose any tax increase for
Social Security and support making personal retirement accounts part of
Social Security
reform.