I would therefore argue that
by focussing on what is essentially a practical impossibility for the previous non-residential or non-custodial
parent to prove his increased costs simply upon reaching the 40 per cent threshold (as
opposed to recognizing that
parent's fixed and discretionary costs of exercising access or joint custody), both the Court and the Guidelines themselves are unfortunately perpetuating what may very well be a
most unjust treatment of children in one
parent's household.