That conversation is likely to be lively, as teacher unions and many local school boards have
opposed changes to the law in the past.
Not exact matches
If the financial connection
to China, a country whose government typically
opposes transparency and political dissent, seems problematic, Hwang isn't concerned: «If anything, we are informing the public about upcoming
changes in
laws as well as the decision makers behind it, emboldening affected parties
to act up and speak up if necessary,» he said.
Those pushing for
change are dismissed as quixotic, he argues, and those who
oppose new
laws aren't forced
to defend their positions.
and at the time of jesus moses gallileo newton charles darwin, people
opposed them but ultimately the same people bowed
to their eternal truth, so norm is man made not natural and it
changes from time
to time, the only thing which is self reliant and unchanging is mother nature, so Sikh faith is not a ritualistic dumb faith, indeed it's a lifestyle which tells
to «Respect and follow The
Laws of Nature and not
to destroyy the beauty of nature».
In chiding Justice Kennedy he wrote: «It is one thing for a society
to elect
change; it is another for a court of
law to impose
change by adjudging those who
oppose it hostis humani generis, enemies of the human race.»
While most wouldn't stretch
to making meteorological predictions, many Christians were openly
opposed to the
change in the
law.
What Brodsky was referring
to was actually a series of press releases from the state DAs Association, which vehemently
opposed, and lobbied
to block, drug
law reform both in 2004 when the first
changes were signed into
law by then - Gov.
Conservatism, broadly, is a way of looking at the world that favors conserving or slowly reforming existing
laws and tradition as
opposed to rapid or ideologically based
change.
The Tory side of the Coalition will almost unanimously, apart from the uber - modernisers,
oppose Lords» reform and the Liberal Democrats will
oppose changes to employment
law.
On same sex marriage for example, he says that he
opposes it, but that he will not seek
to change New York's
law (engineered by Governor Cuomo) because «it was done the right way», i.e. by legislative action.
Today, however, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal announced his intention
to oppose changing state
law to allow his Lousiana citizens
to qualify for the second two unemployment provisions.
However, the Conservative»» coalition partners remain fiercely
opposed to any
changes to the current
law and Chris Huhne, the Lib Dem energy secretary, said: «If Conservative backbenchers persist in wanting
to tear up the European Convention on Human Rights, then I can foresee a time when this party would be extremely uncomfortable in coalition.»
Interestingly enough, the governor pivoted from
opposing any
changes to his teacher evaluation
law to suggesting there may be tweaks in store during the post-budget session in order
to accommodate Common Core implementation concerns.
Traditionalists
oppose this
law, because they don't think we should
change the way things are when things seem
to be working just fine.
That was only the start of an ambitious list — ambitious because Senate Republicans have almost religiously sided with real estate groups that donate generously
to their party's candidates; ambitious because the
laws are not set
to sunset and be vigorously reviewed until 2015; and ambitious because real estate interests have generally
opposed these sorts of
changes.
But it also came after Flanagan pledged
to enact some
changes to the gun control
law, which is deeply
opposed by gun - rights advocates, who are skeptical of the Long Islander's leadership in the chamber given his vote in favor of the SAFE Act in 2013.
In January 2006 he criticised Westminster MPs over the introduction of civil partnerships in the UK, and Holyrood members over the liberalisation of divorce
laws in Scotland, [82] In July 2006 he
opposed proposals
to change the
law which would require Catholic adoption agencies
to place children with homosexuals in the same way as with heterosexuals, calling them totalitarian.
New York City's rent regulation
laws expire this year and it will be up
to the state, as
opposed to the city,
to extend and make any
changes to the
laws.
The debate came after a row over plans
to change fox hunting
laws in England and Wales, with a vote being axed after the SNP said it would
oppose the move.
Both Planned Parenthood and New York State Right
to Life
opposed the referendum, fearing
changes in abortion
law that would not be
to their liking.
While Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and much of the Albany establishment
opposed the measure, many good - government types said a constitutional convention would be the best way
to break down institutional corruption in Albany by forcing
changes in campaign finance and ethics
laws that state legislature would never approve.
1912: NEA endorses Women's Suffrage 1919: NEA members in New Jersey lead the way
to the nation's first state pension; by 1945, every state had a pension plan in effect 1941: NEA successfully lobbied Congress for special funding for public schools near military bases 1945: NEA lobbied for the G.I. Bill of Rights
to help returning soldiers continue their education 1958: NEA helps gain passage of the National Defense Education Act 1964: NEA lobbies
to pass the Civil Rights Act 1968: NEA leads an effort
to establish the Bilingual Education Act 1974: NEA backs a case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court that proposes
to make unlawful the firing of pregnant teachers or forced maternity leave 1984: NEA fights for and wins passage of a federal retirement equity
law that provides the means
to end sex discrimination against women in retirement funds 2000s: NEA has lobbied for
changes to the No Child Left Behind Act 2009: NEA delegates
to the Representative Assembly pass a resolution that
opposes the discriminatory treatment of same - sex couple
We also most strongly urge lawmakers
to oppose changes in the PA charter
law that would allow charter schools
to expand without the approval of local school boards.
Only State Superintendent Torlakson can't even bring himself
to a Lincoln position of saying publicly he
opposes charter schools but will follow the charter
laws until they
change.
When they must
oppose another person or group — for example, in lobbying for a
change to an ordinance or state
law — they do it on the merits of the issue, without resorting
to name calling or righteous indignation.
In compliance with the French
law dated 6th January 1978 on information technology and data protection, Members have the right
to access, query,
change, and
oppose the use of stored personal information about them for legitimate reasons or, in particular,
to oppose commercial prospection.
Those who
oppose climate
change regulation want
to win the public relations game because without public support no climate
change laws will be made.
The opponents of climate
change policies have largely succeeded in
opposing proposed climate
change law and policy by claiming that government action on climate
change should be
opposed because: (1) it will impose unacceptable costs on national economics or specific industries and destroy jobs, (2) there is too much scientific uncertainty
to warrant government action, or (3) it would be unfair and ineffective for nations like the United States
to adopt expensive climate policies as long as China or India fail
to adopt serious greenhouse gas emissions reductions policies.
The opponents of climate
change policies have succeeded in
opposing proposed climate
change law and policy by claiming that government action on climate
change should be
opposed because: (1) it will impose unacceptable costs on national economics or specific industries and destroy jobs, (2) there is too much scientific uncertainty
to warrant government action, or (3) it would be unfair and ineffective for nations like the United States
to adopt expensive climate policies as long as China or India fail
to adopt serious greenhouse gas emissions reductions policies.
Actually, the relevant «
law» is not the ever rising entropic «heat death» of the universe from CO2, but instead is Le Châtelier's principle for a reaction in physical chemistry: the disturbance of the equilibrium of greenhouse gases H2O and CO2 by CO2 injections acts
to oppose the
change to the equilibrium, and thus
to cancel out the effect on temperature from the increase in CO2.
Government leaders from Poland's conservative
Law and Justice Party actively
oppose the European Union's climate
change targets, even as other countries are aggressively moving
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute
to global warming.
In fact, all the Center's work
to fight global warming — from petitioning and litigating for warming - threatened species
to enforcing key
laws like the California Environmental Quality Act
to opposing too - low national fuel economy standards — have played an enormous role in putting climate
change on the political map, making it that much harder for those who would deny it
to suppress the truth.
While efforts are being made by some
law schools
to change their curriculums
to graduate «practice ready» students, the great majority of «lawyer training» (as
opposed to «legal education») occurs in an attorney's first few years of practice.
That said, my next Slaw contribution, unless the draft
changes, will seek
to argue that the idea of
law publishing business, as
opposed to law publishing, has run its course.
The dean and I worked together
to try
to bring about positive
changes to the
law school, however, in the end there were forces that were fiercely
opposed to any
change.»
On at least three different occasions during the hour and a half negotiation either I or the
opposing attorney asked for language in the agreement based on nothing more than our clear expectation that the family court judges could not be expected
to follow case
law on what is a
change of circumstances or not giving precedential value
to a temporary order at the final hearing.
«The proposal
to change the name of American Association of
Law Libraries
to the Association for Legal Information has failed by a vote of 1998 (80.11 percent)
opposed,
to 496 (19.89 percent) in favor.
The petition was not
opposed by the Alberta Government, and Justice Paul Belzil gave the province one year
to work out certain exemptions before the
change becomes
law.
But he says he
opposes the
changes to existing
law, which redefine what constitutes a frivolous lawsuit and make it easier for judges
to dismiss them.
However, I am not
opposed to considering lesser
changes such as: (1) relaxing some of the fee - sharing restrictions currently imposed on multi-disciplinary partnerships, (2) permitting
law firms
to use other types of corporations besides professional corporations, or (3) permitting long - time employees of a
law firm
to have a small ownership interest in a
law firm, at least while they are employed by that firm.
To my mind, the most telling result is this: The survey asked Chief Legal Officers (CLOs) to rate how much pressure corporations are putting on law firms to change the value proposition in legal service delivery, as opposed to simply cutting costs..
To my mind, the most telling result is this: The survey asked Chief Legal Officers (CLOs)
to rate how much pressure corporations are putting on law firms to change the value proposition in legal service delivery, as opposed to simply cutting costs..
to rate how much pressure corporations are putting on
law firms
to change the value proposition in legal service delivery, as opposed to simply cutting costs..
to change the value proposition in legal service delivery, as
opposed to simply cutting costs..
to simply cutting costs....
And secondly, as a practical matter, ironically one of the ways of keeping businesses small, making it just say mom - and - pop stores as
opposed to Marijuana, Inc is
to not
change any of the banking
laws.
The judgment is also notable for a postscript by Mummery LJ (and a short concurring judgment by Thomas LJ) pointing out that there are compelling arguments of policy as
to whether or not agency workers should have employment rights against the end - user, but stating that litigants should not have unrealistic expectations as
to what the courts (as
opposed to Parliament) can do
to change the
law.
This is a decision of great constitutional importance — the reiteration that Parliament is sovereign and has the power
to decide upon
changes in UK
law, as
opposed to the government using the historic royal prerogative power.
The proposed
changes to the auto insurance
laws are being vehemently
opposed by the Michigan Democrats.
To identify elected officials who
oppose changing the
law.
I was at first strongly
opposed to any presumptions in Canadian child custody
law but over the years my views began
to change as I read more and listened more.
In the Board of Directors meeting Saturday, those
opposed to the
change suggested both sending the proposal back
to the MLS committee and
changing the AVM data feed requirement so that it would only apply in states where disclosure of sales price is mandated by state
law.