Sentences with phrase «opposing attorneys»

Similarly, in the Unified Family Courts, opposing attorneys and opposing parties engage in a variety of tactics in an attempt to build up one side and tear down the other...

In many or even most family law cases, mediation without attorneys can accomplish agreement faster and cheaper than two opposing attorneys arguing back and forth on their own or worse yet, going to court.

We firmly believe in educating you on the law, the process and even the tendencies of opposing attorneys and family court judges with whom we are familiar and enjoy mutually respectful relationships.

Divorce mediation is the preferred option for those couples who wish to obtain a peaceful, amicable separation or divorce without having to obtain their own individual opposing attorneys, which can lead to a long, painful and costly process of a litigated divorce, and possibly result in devastating financial and emotional consequences on the family unit.

Opposing attorneys were granted fees under a contractual fees clause in an operative settlement agreement between some of the parties (although the provision could encompass even another non-party attorney to the settlement agreement).

I spend a lot of time struggling to get opposing attorneys to fully respond to requests for production.

«Practicing patent law is now a whole new ballgame, with new districts, judges, law firms and attorneys rising to prominence — all of which underscores an even greater need for legal analytics to understand the behaviors and track records of opposing attorneys and presiding judges.»

Litigators can use similar approaches to analyze the behavior of opposing attorneys in similar types of cases, the track record of different firms in such cases, and the litigation tendencies of individual parties in specific types of commercial litigation focused on specific legal issues.

Opposing attorneys know it.

We Know Our Opposition: In our nearly 60 years in business, we have seen all the tactics opposing attorneys uses.

Once a court date is set, opposing attorneys and insurance companies become much more eager to settle out of court.

Most personal injury cases — more than ninety percent — are settled out of court through negotiations between the opposing attorneys.

The insurance company and opposing attorneys will only try to take advantage of you, so it's essential to have legal counsel of your own.

Personal injury lawyers negotiate with insurance companies, battle opposing attorneys and face off against individuals and large corporations on behalf of injury victims and families on a daily basis.

If you are an injured motorcyclist, you can expect the insurer or opposing attorneys to try and use reckless - biker stereotypes against you.

Insurance companies and opposing attorneys understand that we have integrity and that we stand by our core values of honesty and ethical conduct.

Learning everything that you can about your accident or injury claim will put you at an advantage when working with opposing attorneys and insurance companies.

But, without fail, opposing attorneys and judgess on my cases were understanding and accommodating.

What specific tactics have opposing attorneys used in similar cases?

It wasn't until 1997, when I obtained successful results for two different clients against opposing attorneys who were considered heavyweights of the local family court bar, that I finally accepted that a career as a family law solo practitioner was a good fit.

We also meet Mick's opposing attorney (Josh Lucas); a former client he plea - bargained into prison (Michael Pena); a cop (Bryan Cranston) who considers him a shyster and, most valuable, Mick's private investigator (William H. Macy).

When an opposing attorney asks him why he never defends an innocent client, Hank replies that «an innocent man can't afford me.»

When a client or opposing attorney calls your office, who is the first person that they speak with?

You can put it delicately and explain how the opposing attorney can create a problem, but it can still be awkward to tell a trusted spouse that he or she needs to leave the room during this important conversation.

During one portion of the presentation, while ironically stressing the importance of treating other counsel with respect, he related a story in which after receiving a settlement offer that he deemed disrespectful, he hurled profanities at opposing counsel before telling the opposing attorney that he was «taking this case through trial» and that he would «[expletive] you and your client so hard in the [expletive] you'll have nightmares about the day you disrespected me with this [expletive].»

On at least three different occasions during the hour and a half negotiation either I or the opposing attorney asked for language in the agreement based on nothing more than our clear expectation that the family court judges could not -LSB-...]

The opposing attorney objected, however, citing the best evidence rule: the locomotive itself was the best evidence that the locomotive was defective.

Therefore, the opposing attorney argued, the actual locomotive should be admitted into evidence — not the photographs of it.

Assume every future employer and opposing attorney will see your page.

If criminal lawyers are jerks, they will have a harder time working on their next case with the same opposing attorney.

Always when the opposing attorney belittles your experience.

I was able to use that email to demonstrate to the Court that an opposing attorney was misrepresenting our conversations.

Because the outcome of business division can have a significant effect on both parties, it is important that you do not rely on the opposing attorney's valuation.

He was able to help me and my brand new business through a difficult time by staying focused on the issues at hand, not getting sidetracked or distracted by the opposing attorney's diatribes, and maintaining values that make him someone you want on your side in any litigation.

On at least three different occasions during the hour and a half negotiation either I or the opposing attorney asked for language in the agreement based on nothing more than our clear expectation that the family court judges could not be expected to follow case law on what is a change of circumstances or not giving precedential value to a temporary order at the final hearing.

An opposing attorney filed a motion for sanctions under Rule 37 (b)(2), SCRCP, when my clients failed to answer discovery within the deadline set under a prior court order.

It has wasted the time and effort of an opposing attorney practicing in a small office.

Assuming my client wants primacy and the opposing attorney refuses to dismiss the later - filed complaint, a motion to dismiss brought under that subsection should remedy the matter.

It seems undeniable that in a trial, if one of the lawyers spends 80 or 100 percent of his or her cross - and direct - examination time arguing his or her case through the window of the witnesses on the stand and the opposing attorney using traditional methods gives up the opportunity to argue the case during direct examination (and as a result is able to argue his or her case through the window of the witnesses on the stand only 50 percent or less of the time), the first lawyer will have the advantage.

The opposing attorney, 39 year - old Artem Ibragilov, then goes over and punches Tankov.

Even if there is an opposing attorney that works for the Bankruptcy Court?

It will take skill, confidence and the ability to work with the opposing attorney and successfully hammer out a settlement that both parties can agree to.

Don't represent yourself and risk getting taken advantage of by an opposing attorney or insurance company.

What is the litigation experience and the results achieved by an opposing attorney or law firm?

It's not enough to know that someone else was at fault; you also need to know what your claim is worth before ever accepting an offer made by an insurance company or opposing attorney.

In most cases, this demand will go to either an insurance company or an opposing attorney.

In our role as expert witness or child custody evaluator we have frequently observed attorneys being challenged by common misperceptions and misinformation of Parental Alienation by an opposing attorney or even the judge.

In one case where the opposing attorney fees were $ 166,000, there were no assets and little debt.

However, in mediation you can reach mutual agreements about living arrangements and schedules for the children that satisfy everyone's needs without jeopardizing any legal rights as interpreted by an opposing attorney.

We know the judge who will preside over your case, and we likely will know the opposing attorney.