Sentences with phrase «opposing party in your case»

In addition, the BHA and RISC are pleased to announce that the trial will definitely go ahead, after the opposing parties in the case — the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and the Secretary of State for Education — agreed to the BHA and RISC's request for a protective costs order.

If the opposing party in your case appeals a final ruling of a trial court or agency or board, that party is the «appellant» and you are the «appellee.»

However, be aware that the criminal law focuses on punishing your harasser and if the police lay charges you will not be the opposing party in the case.

Not exact matches

And she says that the fact that all three parties proposed Lords reform in their manifestos makes the case for a referendum even stronger, because people did not have the chance to vote for a party opposed to it.

The evidence in this case demonstrates that under California's blanket primary system, the prospect of having a party's nominee determined by adherents of an opposing party is far from remote - indeed, it is a clear and present danger.

So, with this I think the next wiser step left for Osoba is to lead his people out of (Egypt) APC to promised land.Moreso, with what his on grand now in ogun state toward 2015 election, am sorry for Amosu, especially when all who is who in ogun politics are ready to work with Osoba and there is strong alliance discussion going on in opposition party, but people even in Amosun cabinet were leaving APC day by day, I foresee what happened in Ekiti and kwara between Olushola SARAKI and then governor Lawal again in ogun come 2015, The victory of Aregbesola for APC in osun is so diffrent with this: some few month to election in osun many politician especially former governors were started joining APC to support Aregbesola while reverse is the case in ogun here, many even in cabinet are leaving the government to oppose Amosun, just imagine ew months to election now all former governors were agaist Amosun, all senators, Reps, and many assembly members were leaving APC agaist him and this is just the begining.Though,» ETI O WUN A WI TI OLUWA LASE» yet All EYI O WUN TI A NWI NI 2001, ILE OSOBA NI OLUWA TI FI ADE SI NI 2011.

So, to keep my running list current, courts are not at all interested in hearing your clever rhetoric; your emotional exaggerations of how good, bad or ugly the other side's case is; or your disrespectful or uncivil language directed toward the court, opposing counsel, parties, witnesses or anyone else.

It is noteworthy that, as is often the case, the third parties themselves do not appear to have participated in the Quebec proceeding — instead it was the US Plaintiff, Neptune, who was opposing the Request.

But if they are dealing with an unreasonable opposing party or lawyer, they will prepare like there is no tomorrow, will give their case their all and will make sure they do everything in their power to achieve what the client deserves.

Lawyers should counsel their clients just because the mediator may spend more time in the opposing parties» room, that does not necessarily mean that the mediator believes the other side has the more compelling case.

The same result has been reached in cases where the party opposing enforcement has alleged that the arbitral procedure was irregular, but at the same time chose not to participate in the proceedings.

Strategic insights include trends in case timing, resolutions, findings, damages, and remedies, as well as actionable intelligence on opposing counsel, law firms, parties, judges and venues.

The distinction between the varying approaches may be more apparent than real, and in many cases may lead to the same outcome particularly since not all courts distinguish between them and / or refer to them simultaneously.903 Of the few decisions where a foreign award has been refused enforcement pursuant to the second alternative of article V (1)(d), the party opposing enforcement brought evidence of fundamental or unjustifiable procedural defects that one could consider would have met the criteria of both approaches.

The motions judge in SC v. NS concluded that the act of one lawyer for a client sharing the opposing party's compelled discovery evidence — in this case, documents — with another lawyer representing the same client in another related proceeding constitutes prohibited «use» of the evidence.

OPPOSING PARTY DISOBEYING SUMMONS (12) When an opposing party has been served with a summons under subrule (3), the court may make a final order in favour of the party calling the witness, adjourn the case or make any other appropriate order, including a contempt order, if the opposinOPPOSING PARTY DISOBEYING SUMMONS (12) When an opposing party has been served with a summons under subrule (3), the court may make a final order in favour of the party calling the witness, adjourn the case or make any other appropriate order, including a contempt order, if the opposing pPARTY DISOBEYING SUMMONS (12) When an opposing party has been served with a summons under subrule (3), the court may make a final order in favour of the party calling the witness, adjourn the case or make any other appropriate order, including a contempt order, if the opposinopposing party has been served with a summons under subrule (3), the court may make a final order in favour of the party calling the witness, adjourn the case or make any other appropriate order, including a contempt order, if the opposing pparty has been served with a summons under subrule (3), the court may make a final order in favour of the party calling the witness, adjourn the case or make any other appropriate order, including a contempt order, if the opposing pparty calling the witness, adjourn the case or make any other appropriate order, including a contempt order, if the opposingopposing partyparty,

Legal analytics gives litigators an advantage over opposing counsel by providing data - driven insights into how judges, attorneys, and parties have behaved in similar cases in the past, and how they are likely to behave in similar cases in the future.

In the case, Schaefer v. Universal Scaffolding, the court held that a party claiming an opposing party intentionally lost or destroyed evidence must show that they would have had a «reasonable probability» of success if the evidence had been preserved.

If the case is filed in court after the one - year statute of limitations has passed, the court is more likely than not to grant the opposing party's request to dismiss the case for untimeliness.

The Foda case highlights that litigants in lawsuits can and will attempt to affect the reputation of the opposing party online, something I've predicted repeatedly.

After that, we will have access to a pre-court process called Questioning (formerly called discoveries) where we can cross examine the defendant under oath on the accident details, and ask for depositions and documents that the opposing party plans to use in their case.

I used him an an expert in a family law case to prove that California custody orders are not enforceable in Japan and the Court relied on his testimony to deny the opposing party's move away request.

If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).

Lawyers assist in the preparation of the lawsuit and throughout the various stages of discovery — the process by which opposing parties exchange relevant, non-privileged information relating to the case.

In such cases, I found that it was critical to be crystal clear with everyone involved — the client, the opposing party or lawyer and the court — about the nature and extent of my involvement in the filIn such cases, I found that it was critical to be crystal clear with everyone involved — the client, the opposing party or lawyer and the court — about the nature and extent of my involvement in the filin the file.

In one case, the opposing party pushed the limits.

In cases in which the opposing party has sought fees, the family court has uniformly required disclosure of billing records when that party has refused to provide me such records upon a claim of privilegIn cases in which the opposing party has sought fees, the family court has uniformly required disclosure of billing records when that party has refused to provide me such records upon a claim of privilegin which the opposing party has sought fees, the family court has uniformly required disclosure of billing records when that party has refused to provide me such records upon a claim of privilege.

These analytics will provide insights on the types of cases in which experts were retained, their appearances by jurisdiction and judge, the parties and attorneys that have retained them, and the top experts used by opposing counsel.

Courtrooms in the UK and Singapore have shown that existing tools can be deployed to conduct trials with little or no paper and provide opposing parties, attorneys, judges and witnesses with secure, electronic access to all relevant materials for the life of a case.

An offer to settle can be made to the opposing party in a family law dispute to settle all or an aspect of the case.

This will necessarily be a flexible story that can be adapted to the facts as they are revealed in discovery, to the way the case progresses procedurally before the court, and in response to the opposing party's positions.

A final risk is that the trial court would normally be unaware of these offensive allegations if the opposing party failed to raise them in his or her case - in - chief.

Defending you in case the opposing party decides to dossier a case in opposition to you.

Attorney Fetto's experience as a skilled and successful trial attorney gives him an edge that benefits his clients, as he knows how to ruthlessly dismantle the opposing party's case in order to get the truth.

All of the parties strongly opposed this last - minute change in approach to the management of this case.

Alternatively, seeking inter partes review late in the 12 - month filing time might allow a petitioner to take advantage of knowledge gained about the opposing party's case, as it will likely have been presented already in the infringement lawsuit.

Litigators can use similar approaches to analyze the behavior of opposing attorneys in similar types of cases, the track record of different firms in such cases, and the litigation tendencies of individual parties in specific types of commercial litigation focused on specific legal issues.

Although there may be circumstances where such directions can be sought on an ex parte basis (i.e., without notice to the opposing party with the privacy interest in the records), this was not such a case.

Under Illinois law, a forum selection clause is generally valid and should be enforced unless (1) the opposing party shows that it would violate a strong public policy of the state in which the case is filed or (2) enforcing the clause would be unreasonable in that it is so inconvenient that it basically deprives the party of its day in court.

Then enter your case details and the opposing party's information and we will notify them via email asking them to participate in the VCH online process.

In all cases, the party seeking the Injunction order must be scrupulously frank and forthcoming about the relevant facts, whether they are in favour or opposed to his or her legal positioIn all cases, the party seeking the Injunction order must be scrupulously frank and forthcoming about the relevant facts, whether they are in favour or opposed to his or her legal positioin favour or opposed to his or her legal position.

(A) Except as otherwise stipulated or directed by the court, a party who retains or specially employs a witness to provide expert testimony in the case, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve giving expert testimony, shall deliver to the opposing party a written report prepared and signed by the witness within 60 days of the close of discovery.

You will then have to give the opposing party at least 7 days to respond to your Notice of Motion unless your Motion is urgent in which case you will have to ask for permission from the Court to have it heard sooner.

He argued the Global Aerospace case before the Circuit Court in Loudoun County, Virginia, which is the first case to permit the use of TAR over the objection of the opposing party.

A notice of peremptory challenge of judge shall be filed in writing with the clerk of the court in which the case is pending and a copy served on the opposing party.

The fact that the document is created electronically as opposed to as a hard copy can make no difference... if a party or a party's agent sending an e-mail types his or her or his or her principal's name to the extent required or permitted by existing case law in the body of an e-mail, then in my view that would be a sufficient signature.»

Examination for discovery allows a party in a civil case to examine, under oath, the opposing party orally before trial.

«However,de - tariffing motor third - party premium would help the customers more as in this case good customers would enjoy lower premium as opposed to the current scenario wherein good customers are subsidising the bad customers,» Bharti Axa General Insurance MD and CEO Amarnath Ananthanarayanan said.

• Demonstrated ability to prepare and revise legal correspondence and memos • Focused on handling highly confidential information with discretion and integrity • Committed to organizing and prioritizing cases according to their nature of urgency • Adept at handling research work using legal references and Internet resources • Particularly effective in maintaining attorneys» schedules and handling appointments • Familiar with court rules and filing procedures and making service on opposing parties • Proficient in using online services such as Westlaw and Lexis for legal research information • Documented success in generating revenue by documenting and inputting attorney's billable time and reimbursable expenses • Strong organizational skills aimed at ensuring that clerical and administrative support is constantly available to attorneys • Qualified to dig out precedence information and assist in building up cases • Expert user of Power Point, Word and Excel to assist in creating presentations, handling correspondence needs and developing spreadsheets • Exceptional knowledge of using email applications to correspond with clients and ability to type 90 words per minute

However, because trial remains an option, in litigation practice lawyers always must have cases run on two tracks: (i) reach out and attempt to come to settlement with the opposing party while (ii) always preparing to fight it out in court in the event that settlement is not reached.

Attorneys in traditional litigated cases tend to draft questions to be answered under oath, set depositions, conduct research to not only put their client in the best possible light but to put the opposing party in the worst possible light, and prepare for trial.