Once more, the difference runs as deep as
the opposing philosophical views of the «world» that the two theologies hold.
Not exact matches
Here is a splendid example of a seemingly strong (empirical) case for a
philosophical view, a case which is nevertheless inconclusive, and indeed can be
opposed by perhaps a still stronger though non-empirical case.
«No one has ever touched Zeno without refuting him,» he writes in a short essay commenting on the fundamental line of thought in his chief
philosophical work, Process and Reality.16 In the same essay he explicitly distinguishes his theory from two other
opposed positions: on the one hand from the
view that interprets the character of becoming as illusory and becoming itself as simply empty and nonexistent in comparison with beings and their being.