Not exact matches
In the
case of King Saul (the biblical narrative
of preference for those on the «less supportive»
side of the support -
oppose the president spectrum), the scripture is clear that God wasn't thrilled about the idea
of a monarchy in Israel at all, but did indeed choose Saul to be the man to occupy it (1 Samuel 8:1 - 22).
«It is the
case in Oxford and Cambridge Union debating contests that the competitors are given one
side of the argument to debate blind, and so may have to argue a
case they
oppose, as I remember from my own first year efforts at Oxford» What a curious remark to make!
But EPA also recently approved 42 permits for Appalachian mining operations, including some mountaintop mines, and
sided with the coal industry in
opposing the rehearing
of an appeals court
case that could have decided whether the Army Corps has been improperly handling mountaintop permits.
Everyone was told to prepare to convince their meeting partner to come around to their
side; half
of the subjects, however, were told to prepare to make their
case to a member
of the
opposing political party, and half were told to make their
case to a member
of their own party.
Pierce Brosnan (The Thomas Crown Affair, Die Another Day) and Julianne Moore (Magnolia, Hannibal) star as New York's finest divorce attorneys, one
of whom will be faced with losing a
case for the first time when they find themselves on
opposing sides.
The
case winds up in family court, mother and son fighting each other for custody, leaving the judge with the authority to decide the girl's fate, Courtroom drama follows, with Frank defended well by his lawyer, Fred Cullen (Glenn Plummer) and
opposed by child welfare authority rep, and we do get to hear the decision
of the court, allowing us to take
sides as well.
Every
side has a strong
case to defend their position, and counter-arguments to refute the
opposing points
of view.
So, to keep my running list current, courts are not at all interested in hearing your clever rhetoric; your emotional exaggerations
of how good, bad or ugly the other
side's
case is; or your disrespectful or uncivil language directed toward the court,
opposing counsel, parties, witnesses or anyone else.
Opposing sides say the ruling on an upcoming Supreme Court
case might encourage dangerous driving — or increased use
of force.»
Though most criminal law
cases are settled outside
of the courtroom, those settlements only go the way you want if the
opposing side knows you will fight aggressively.
At its simplest level, lawyers from the same law firm can not take on
opposing sides in the same
case but they should also not act for the competitors
of major clients
of the firm.
Track record delivers on this but takes it a step further in that it enables any lawyer who worked on a
case to identify co-counsel or
opposing counsel
of the same
case, providing both
sides equal opportunity to express their own perspectives
of the
case.
I prefer to see everything up front and err on the
side of caution as
opposed to learning a year into the lawsuit (or even right before trial) that there are documents that have not been produced that hurt or, even worse, help my client's
case.
If a Response is not filed, the
opposing spouse may lose his or her right to present their
side of the
case to the court.
In 27 per cent
of family law
cases the
opposing side had no lawyer at all and another 21 per cent had no lawyer for part
of the
case.
If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use
of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their
case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the
opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other
side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).
We will investigate the circumstances
of the incident, file with the court
of law, request applicable medical or law enforcement records, and communicate with the
opposing side in an effort to settle your
case early.
However, many lawyers have a much higher percentage
of «non-recommended» reviews filtered out, in some
cases even outnumbering the recommended ones, which suggests some hanky - panky in the form
of soliciting fake reviews, either on the part
of the attorney or the
opposing side.
Timelines vary widely depending on the nature
of your
case, deadlines set by the court, and how quickly the
opposing side responds.
These are
cases that rely almost solely upon the testimony
of expert witnesses and both
sides» experts are offering contradictory, or maybe even diametrically
opposed testimony.
The trucking insurance company on the
opposing side of your accident
case isn't there to help you.
In this phase, you and the
opposing side will be asked a range
of general and specific questions about the
case, including details explaining your
side of the story.
Going it alone in a personal injury
case is often a bad idea, as the
opposing counsel will be extremely experienced in discrediting your
side of the
case.
The video also briefly shows part
of the
opposing side's low - tech presentation (begins at 5:15), which is based on «sticky notes» and a PowerPoint template that is not tailored to the
case at hand.
With meticulous factual and legal analysis, we are able to dissect the issues, build the strength
of our
case and identify weaknesses on the
opposing side.
While the discovery rules (especially the civil rules) often allow for broad investigation
of the
opposing side's
case, they simultaneously create broad exposure to respond to civil discovery requests, which can multiply costs and create self - incrimination issues.
Some litigation counsel will even avoid raising the subject
of settlement for fear the
opposing side will take it as a sign
of the lawyer's weakness, or — just as bad — their
case's fragility.
They should also be aware
of «personal conflicts they might have: relatives / friends on the
opposing side, stock or business interests that might be a conflict,
cases they worked on in previous employment, etc.» says Voisin.
Indeed, it is a matter
of general importance that the facts in this
case be the subject
of a hearing on its merits so that the significant legal conclusions deriving therefrom will have more weight in future
cases as
opposed to findings made as a result
of a hearing where only one
side participated, albeit through the fault
of the other
side.
We staffed the
case with one partner and one associate and collaborated extensively (compared to an expansive team
of outside and inside counsel for the
opposing side.)
The
cases all wrap around the
sides of the Neo Reloaded, too, as
opposed to other modular phones which just have swappable backplates.