It's always interesting when big law firms take
opposing views on a matter of strategy, whether it's their approach to equity and compensation, or the merits of a particular practice area or geography.
Not exact matches
But the really strange thing about this is that the
views of these two Drs Snelling,
on matters such as the age of the earth and its geological strata, are diametrically
opposed.
For example, as the result of law suits instituted by public - interest groups, the courts held that whenever broadcasters present a particular point of
view on a
matter of public importance, they also must provide opportunities for
opposing viewpoints to be presented.
But the latest in a series of studies that began in 2010 found evidence that supports an
opposing view on the subject, claiming that it doesn't really
matter whether you lift heavy or light and whether you do it in the low or high rep range — both combinations have the same potential to stimulate gains in terms of strength and mass.
It didn't
matter if you said something that supported or
opposed his point of
view, he judged it
on the merits and if it was a dumb idea, he'd tell you so, in no uncertain terms.