I perceive WUWT and RealClimate as having
opposite biases in terms of the works they choose to present and the beliefs of the people who maintain the sites, but WUWT provides fairer treatment to people who write dissenting views.
Late last month the IEA, a usually broadly respectable free market think tank, published the most ludicrous report into the BBC showing - you guessed it - precisely
the opposite bias.
Instead, it appears to have approached it from
the opposite bias — it can never be done right.
While bonobos are similarly adept in discriminating helpers from hinderers, they show
the opposite bias, consistently favoring hinderers over helpers.
For example, if the rest of our holdings has a bias, we may prefer to use a fund with
the opposite bias, to compensate.
I can understand that an NYT IP attorney might have a strong copyright holder bias (though they might well also have
the opposite bias), but I can't imagine a competent IP attorney telling a journalist that they couldn't publish such documents for fear of copyright liability.
(I would like to slightly reverse Steven Matthews question, and apply
the opposite bias) Mr. Justice Rothstein: Where controversial issues are deemed by segments of the public to have a moral component, what role do you believe the Supreme Court should have in applying and interpreting the law to deal with such cases?
The researchers found «evidence that men in established romantic relationships err in the direction of
the opposite bias and underperceive their romantic partner's sexual desire.
Across three studies of long - term, established couples, we found that men err in the direction of
the opposite bias; specifically, they underperceive their romantic partner's sexual desire.