In this March 30, 2016 photo, students hold signs in favor of
opting out of state assessments during a visit by New York Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia to the William Street School in Lancaster, N.Y. New York last year saw the highest rate of opt - outs in the country as parents protested the volume of testing and the high - stakes consequences.
The leader of the Buffalo teachers union is outraged over the Buffalo School District's Sit and Stare policy for students who
opted out of state assessments this week.
Principal Cecelie Owens tells WBFO News the school will hold a pep rally today to encourage students not to
opt out of state assessments.
Not exact matches
Leaders
of Long Island's anti-testing movement, whose boycott efforts captured national attention last year, are expanding their campaign
of encouraging parents and students to
opt out of the
state's standardized Common Core
assessments, scheduled for next month.
The anti-testing movement, which encourages parents to
opt their kids
out of the
state's standardized Common Core
assessments, is getting some support from Assembly Education Committee Chairwoman Cathy Nolan.
It appears the
opt -
out movement continues to be strong in the Western New York region, after students finished the first day
of the
state assessments in English language arts.
Newly elected Regents Chancellor Betty Rosa,
of the Bronx, had a clear message for parents: You have the right to
opt your children
out of state assessments.
Hawkins and Jones want the
state to
opt out of Common Core and
opt into individual
assessments like the Performance Based Assessment Tasks (PBATs) used by 26 public schools in New York City.
«I just don't know what would happen in that case,» Bob Lowry, deputy director
of the New York
State Council
of School Superintendents, said about potential local
assessment opt outs.
Despite the civil rights community's agreement about the importance
of state assessments, Ravitch continues to support
opting out.
And both EdNext (60/26) and PDK (59/37) find voters strongly oppose letting parents
opt their children
out of state assessments.
West Seneca Central continues to be
opt -
out central, with nearly three - quarters
of its students refusing to take the English Language Arts
state assessments Tuesday.
They might require participating private schools to accept all applicants, regardless
of religion or sexual orientation, or whether they meet the school's academic requirements; let students
opt -
out of religious instruction; mandate that scholarship students take
state assessments; and on and on.
Indiana education officials disagree with
Opt Out organizers»
assessment, saying they've changed the guidelines
of the
state's school letter grading system to consider figures other than test scores alone.
In addition, the main thrust
of the report's criticism, that the
state's ESSA plan is not sufficiently similar to what it would have been had No Child Left Behind remained in effect, assumes the test - based accountability strategy that these reviewers have made their careers pursuing had been effective, which it has not; and therefore, when coupled with the false claim that California has high - quality academic standards and
assessments, which it doesn't (California's standards being based on the Common Core, which leaves American students 2 - 3 years behind their peers in East Asia and northern Europe), California's families remain well advised to
opt out of state schooling wherever and whenever possible, until the overreach from both the federal and
state capitals is brought to an end and local schools that want to pursue genuinely world - class excellence can thrive.
Under a new
state law, parents can
opt their children
out of taking Smarter Balanced and the alternative
assessment given to students with cognitive disabilities.
A school can lose points on the
state report cards (a 5 - point deduction) if its test participation falls below 95 percent; however, a individual student who
opts out of taking a required
assessment is not counted in the calculation (i.e., is left
out of the calculation)
of proficiency rates for his or her school or district.
Representative Mayfield filed HB 877 to make legal options for parents to
opt their children
out of state assessments.
Title I districts are also newly required by the ESSA to annually notify parents and guardians that they may request information on any
state or local policy regarding student participation in any
state or district - required
assessment, including any parental rights they may have to
opt their child
out of taking a required
assessment.
In some
states the answer is clear:
State policies either allow or prohibit state assessment opt - outs, or state departments of education issue clear guidance that opt - outs are not all
State policies either allow or prohibit
state assessment opt - outs, or state departments of education issue clear guidance that opt - outs are not all
state assessment opt -
outs, or
state departments of education issue clear guidance that opt - outs are not all
state departments
of education issue clear guidance that
opt -
outs are not allowed.
Despite the growing numbers
of completed
assessments, pockets
of parents have decided to «
opt out,» refusing to allow their children to participate in mandated
state tests.
In order to
opt -
out of government - mandated accountability
assessments, a parent needs to understand how to navigate district and
state policy.
And relevant to the
opt -
out movement: although ESSA will allow
states to determine what happens to schools that miss their
assessment participation target, during the transition the DoE will continue to enforce the requirement that 95 %
of students take
state tests.
Re: the US News article on top about ESSA: Chairwoman Foxx is right about the role
of the federal government in America's K - 12 education system; and families can continue to pressure educrats like Mr Botel by
opting out, wherever and whenever possible, from their local
state schools until the federal government gives up on the continuing mistake
of its annual testing requirement in two subjects only, which has produced no significant improvement in American education for 15 years now, but has cost us in lost opportunities, including time and energy that might have been devoted to non-tested subjects, including those in the broader curricula represented by the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, which requires
assessment — including but not limited to external final exams — in six subjects distributed over at least five fields, an
assessment approach that has been imitated by the world's leading educational jurisdictions, but is being discouraged by the ignorant Luddites in the the U.S. ED.
In the above article Chalkbeat focused on how some district practices, in Boulder specifically, discouraged high school students from taking
state standardized tests: for the second year in a row, Boulder high schools continued instruction for ninth - grade students who
opted -
out of PARCC
assessments, effectively penalizing students who took the
state assessments as they had to catch up on the content later (1).
The
state is in the process
of reviewing the standards, and until the
assessments are age and developmentally appropriate, and not Common Core - aligned, Rudley said they will continue to call on parents to
opt -
out their children.
This bill, sponsored by Sen. Sylvia Allen, gives parents the legal authority to
opt their children
out of the statewide
assessment adopted by the
State Board
of Education, including AzMERIT, with no penalty to the child, school, or school district.
Parents who decide it is not in their children's best interests to take these
assessments are part
of an «
Opt -
Out» movement that is growing nationally and in New York
state.
The anti-testing movement, which encourages parents to
opt their kids
out of the
state's standardized Common Core
assessments, is getting some support from Assembly Education Committee Chairwoman Cathy Nolan.
This bill would have allowed school Districts or Charter Schools to «
opt out»
of any competency requirements or
assessments adopted by the
State Board
of Education.
Riding what they see as a wave
of anti-testing sentiment among parents, opponents
of high - stakes
assessments believe a strategy known as
opt -
out — having parents refuse to let their children take
state - mandated tests — could force policymakers to take note
of their cause.