Sentences with phrase «opting out of those requirements»

This bill requires parents to discuss immunizations with a health care practitioner if they are opting out of those requirements for their children, as a personal belief exemption, as is allowable under current law.

If you're 65 or over and self - employed, already in receipt of CPP benefits, and want to opt out of the requirement to pay CPP, you must complete the «Election to stop contributing to the Canada Pension Plan,» which is included on Schedule 8 of your personal tax return.

Required criminal records checks for foster / adoptive parents who receive Federal funds on behalf of a child, unless a State opted out of this requirement

Not exact matches

Hobby Lobby and Conestoga are companies that want to be allowed to opt out, on religious grounds, of the U.S. Affordable Care Act's requirement that employer health plans pay for contraception.

And while the bill's supporters argue that the legislation is a sensible fix that gives states much - needed flexibility on health care programs, the AMA, AAMC, and AARP say it would benefit the young, the healthy, and the rich at the expense of the old, the sick, and the poor by taking hacksaw to the Medicaid program that covers low - income Americans and allowing states to opt out of benefits requirements and other regulations under Obamacare, formally known as the Affordable Care Act.

The Hobby Lobby decision allowed private businesses with religious objections to opt out of the ACA's contraception coverage requirement by filing a notice with insurers or the federal government.

If valid, this explanation would suggest that it would be a good idea for any legislation on board leadership to (a) limit any mandate to the largest firms and (b) permit even those firms to «opt out» of the requirement through periodic shareholder votes (e.g., once every five years).

«[Notification] is hardly a burdensome requirement; nor does it leave the provider — the opt out — with any residual involvement in the coverage of drugs or devices of which it sincerely disapproves on religious grounds,» wrote Judge Richard Posner.

But when some districts complained that it was hard to source satisfactory products, like a good whole - grain pasta, the Obama administration started a waiver program allowing districts showing hardship to opt out of the grain requirement on a product - by - product basis.

Hodson and Maher (2013) argue that the UK has done this before, using the threat of difficulties in treaty ratification to secure opt - outs from the European Union, including the 2011 European Union Act which led to the requirement of referendums to ratify certain treaties.

Furthermore, in all schools parents currently have the right to opt their children out of SRE, but the report suggests that the Government is now mulling over whether this «right of withdrawal» could be removed, and that «faith» schools, some of which have opposed teaching about issues like same sex relationships and the use of contraception, will also be subject to the new requirements.

He says the commission should also look at changing a new requirement that 144 struggling schools in danger of state receivership be judged by their students» test scores and whether or not they opt out of the tests.

Parents in many states may opt out of vaccinating their children by seeking legal exemptions to public school immunization requirements.

February 4, 2015 • California allows parents to opt out of vaccination requirements.

California is one of 20 states that allow parents to opt out of vaccination requirements for reasons of «personal belief.»

Let states opt out of the statutory and regulatory requirements of ESEA, IDEA, Head Start, and other relevant federal laws in exchange for creating a marketplace of informed choice and competition.

Despite widespread media coverage of the opt out movement and significant retreats last year in federal education policy, the public remains solidly behind mandatory testing, with 80 percent favoring a federal requirement for annual testing.

Less than 5 percent of students in those grades opted out of the exams, meeting the 95 percent participation requirement — at least for those grades — under the federal No Child Left Behind law.

They might require participating private schools to accept all applicants, regardless of religion or sexual orientation, or whether they meet the school's academic requirements; let students opt - out of religious instruction; mandate that scholarship students take state assessments; and on and on.

As the assessment reform movement grows ever stronger - with many more students opting out of exams and dozens of additional colleges dropping ACT / SAT requirements - knee - jerk defenders of the test - crazy status quo have launched a nasty counter-attack focused on FairTest.

When that didn't happen, he and U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan essentially rewrote it on their own by releasing a waiver package that allows states that adapt the administration's reforms to opt out of the law's most cumbersome requirements.

An amendment pushed by Heritage Action that would allow states to opt out of the law's requirements altogether but still receive federal funds was left on the cutting room floor when the bill went through the House Rules Committee.

of Education Betsy DeVos urging her to reject Florida's proposal to opt out on requirements related to disadvantaged students.

However, in unethical, immoral and unprofessional attempt to stop students from opting out or being opted out of the unfair and discriminatory Common Core testing scheme, a number of Connecticut schools are telling students that the SBAC test is a graduation requirement.

The opt - out movement has started to push policymakers to roll back testing requirements and consider alternative, more holistic assessments of student achievement.

If a school has more than 65 percent of its students participating in a voucher program, the school must administer the state test to every child in the school; parents of children who do not receive a voucher may opt out of the state test requirement

The Ensure Success for All Students Act retains the requirement for 95 % of students to be subject to annual testing in grades 3 - 8, threatening funding if districts don't comply or parents opt out.

And relevant to the opt - out movement: although ESSA will allow states to determine what happens to schools that miss their assessment participation target, during the transition the DoE will continue to enforce the requirement that 95 % of students take state tests.

Re: the US News article on top about ESSA: Chairwoman Foxx is right about the role of the federal government in America's K - 12 education system; and families can continue to pressure educrats like Mr Botel by opting out, wherever and whenever possible, from their local state schools until the federal government gives up on the continuing mistake of its annual testing requirement in two subjects only, which has produced no significant improvement in American education for 15 years now, but has cost us in lost opportunities, including time and energy that might have been devoted to non-tested subjects, including those in the broader curricula represented by the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, which requires assessment — including but not limited to external final exams — in six subjects distributed over at least five fields, an assessment approach that has been imitated by the world's leading educational jurisdictions, but is being discouraged by the ignorant Luddites in the the U.S. ED.

If a school has more than 65 percent of students participating in a voucher program, the school must administer the state test to every child in the school; parents of children who do not receive a voucher may opt out of the state test requirement

The House's Republican - only bill has even worse accountability provisions that water down testing requirements and allow parents to opt their children out of tests.

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah's final plan to comply with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act comes with one caveat — a request to opt out of student testing requirements.

Perhaps sensing a crisis it did not want to waste, the administration offered waivers that allowed states to opt out of many NCLB requirements, including the proficiency deadline, but only if the state complied with administration conditions.

Utah's final plan to comply with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act comes with one caveat - a request to opt out of student testing requirements.

Once given the opportunity by President Barack Obama in 2013, New Hampshire, along with a majority of states, opted out of the unrealistic requirements of No Child Left Behind, leaving the state much freer to improve its education system on its own terms.

3) Clarify current law that parents have the right to opt their children out of certain testing requirements,

It would have exempted a student from the third grade reading retention requirement if that student's parent had opted - out of the statewide student assessment system.

Opting - out of the state's pass requirement is not an option.

This bill would have allowed school Districts or Charter Schools to «opt out» of any competency requirements or assessments adopted by the State Board of Education.

However, they also celebrated the preservation of annual standardized testing of all students in grades 3 through 8 and once in high school, and they approved of maintaining the requirement that schools must test 95 % of all students and called it a discouragement to the opt - out movement.

Since the parents of all students in public schools were discouraged from opting their children out of this state - mandated «standardized» test experiment, it should be gratifying to those who saw through the misinformation and controversy associated with the Common Core testing requirement and, with courage and conviction, refused to allow their children to take this unnecessary and unproven test.

Instead, Congressional Republicans are backing legislation that would allow states to opt out of federal education requirements.

However, an amendment adopted yesterday would allow parents to opt their children out of the testing required under the federal law and would exempt schools from including students that have opted out from the schools» test participation requirements.

Delaware law permits a company to «opt out» of this class vote requirement by so providing in its Certificate of Incorporation, and the Company has done just that.

Individuals may request to opt - out of having personal information about themselves made available through certain LexisNexis products and services, in accordance with legal requirements or if permitted by LexisNexis policy.

Opt - out of Lexis Nexis - Individuals may request to opt - out of having personal information about themselves made available through certain LexisNexis products and services, in accordance with legal requirements or if permitted by LexisNexis poliOpt - out of Lexis Nexis - Individuals may request to opt - out of having personal information about themselves made available through certain LexisNexis products and services, in accordance with legal requirements or if permitted by LexisNexis poliopt - out of having personal information about themselves made available through certain LexisNexis products and services, in accordance with legal requirements or if permitted by LexisNexis policy.

The best thing for those aggrieved to do would be to file complaints against Chase about the lack of an opt - out provision in their change in terms notice which adds a fee and changes the repayment requirements.

These offers typically are sent if you meet certain requirements such as a minimum credit score, but you may choose to opt out of such correspondence by calling 1 -888-5-OPTOUT (1-888-567-8688).

The deadline for the changes to take effect is July 1, 2010, although some issuers may roll out revamped statements sooner... (more) Consumers gain right to opt out of credit card rate increases — The first phase of the new Credit CARD Act of 2009 kicked in Aug. 20, lengthening notice requirements and giving consumers the right to opt out of rate increases... (more) Fixed rates shift to variable rates — Seven months in advance of the new rules that would limit an issuer's ability to alter a fixed rate account, credit cardholders are being moved to variable rate cards... (more) Credit card issuers: Sorry, new law says we can't cut your rates — Credit card issuers turn on its head the reform law that bans sudden rate increases; they say that it also forbids quick rate cuts... (more)

Consumers gain right to opt out of credit card rate increases — The first phase of the new Credit CARD Act of 2009 kicked in Aug. 20, lengthening notice requirements to 45 days and giving consumers the right to opt out of rate increases.