Is bringing
the option of atheism to people worse than the potential harm done to a child by an «obey or your will be sent to hell» message?
Not exact matches
Under
Option 1: — Christianity is responsible for American Indian genocide, slavery in the US, crusades, Salem witch trials, other odds and ends —
Atheism is responsible for all the deaths to their citizens during the reigns
of Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc..
And the religious denominational plurality along with strong middle class and later working class groups committed to
atheism destroyed any possibility
of return to Christendom, and the only
option for national unity was to secularize the state with equality under law for all religious and secular thought and groups.
The big issue is indeed that when one is brought up in an environment that encourages the belief that there is one one horse in the race, ie the Christian god or at least the Judeo - Christian god, people can WRONGLY assume that the choice is between a narrow range
of theist
options and
atheism.
Since it contrasts the views on the bilboards to the alternative
of atheism it could be seen as portraying a view in which those were the only two
options.
The
option to be either, the choice and ability to do both, means that conservative transhumanism must articulate a postition that supports conservative behavior and values (monogamy, religiousness) but allows very extreme transgressions
of those behaviors and values (polyamory,
atheism).