Sentences with phrase «or minus end»

Experiments also revealed that as pairs of microtubules were jiggled, these proteins shuffled along them in the direction of least resistance, toward either the plus or minus end of the microtubules.

Not exact matches

Open - end funds issue shares based off the net asset value, or NAV (the total value of the assets in the fund minus its liabilities).

Though this post is over a year old, I was wondering whether you got some of the results you were hoping for in the end, and whether you were tracking total carbs or net carbs (carbs minus fibre)-- as tracking net carbs allows us to eat quite a bit of spinach / chard / kale etc — since the fibre content of these veggies is so high..

It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer

His side now stand a slim chance of getting through to the knock - out rounds, if two or more of the third - placed teams in groups fail to secure three points, or end up with three points and a goal difference worse than minus two.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Wenger lost the plot when he brought in Giroud... what about the beautiful game involves having a lumbering striker who's main attribute is holding up play... our success with Wenger, and even before, came with pace and clinical striking up front, having a boss in the midfield and having physically imposing CBs... what about Wright, Bergkamp, Anelka, Henry or RVP remind anyone of Giroud (minus the left foot of course)... the formula was broken, which didn't have to be the end of our success, but when you adopt half - measures you can't expect things just to work themselves out on their own... at the very least Wenger should have brought in some wingers that can consistently cross the ball and then spend significantly more time addressing our lack of success with set pieces... ultimately this is why we continued to struggle with consistency and continued to constantly play people in the wrong positions

At the end of his famous report, Henry Cavendish said of another estimate of G, which deviated from his by 22 percent, well outside his estimated statistical error of plus or minus 7 percent: «[It] differs rather more from the preceding determination than I should have expected.

NextShares list and trade on Nasdaq and are priced at the fund's next end - of - day net asset value (NAV), plus or minus a trading cost determined when the trade executes.1 Trading costs are fully transparent and can be controlled using limit orders.

An after - tax return can be expressed nominally as the difference between an investment's beginning market value and ending market value plus any dividends, interest or other income received and minus any costs or taxes paid.

As noted above (see topic 31), this benefit is generally calculated as the interest on the loan at a prescribed rate, minus any interest actually paid on the loan within the year or 30 days after year - end.

Therefore, the ending loan balance equals $ 1,000 minus $ 12.92, or $ 987.08.

An important distinction is that the price of all NextShares trades equals the fund's next end - of - day net asset value per share (NAV), plus or minus a trading cost (premium / discount) determined in the market when the order executes.

Our home equity lines of credit — or HELOCs — are open - end loans based on the value of your residence minus your mortgage balance.

Whether you chose to be more aggressive and hold 120 minus your age in stocks, follow the more conservative recommendation of your age in bonds, or create your own interpretation of allocation, you should now have an idea of what your portfolio should look like at the end of your planning process.

What that means is at the end of the month, your credit card issuer looks at the money you have spent on the card, minus any credits you have received for returns or refunds.

Whether you're running or throwing, the controls are always exactly the same, plus or minus a few buttons — shake the Wii remote down to begin, wave it around during the event and bash a button at the end.

The more recent global climate models project temperature increases under a business - as - usual model on the order of 5 C, plus or minus about a degree, by the end of the century.

Any polynomials used for regression (with exception of level 0 polynomials) run off to either plus infinity or minus infinity beyond the end of data — unlike world temperatures which stayed within relatively narrow limits for several billions of years already.

For carbon - intensive electricity, all suppliers of electricity to end users would pay the fee, calculated based on the total number of kilowatt - hours sold to customers minus the kilowatt - hours for which the supplier has purchased renewable energy credits (RECs) or entered into long - term contracts for clean energy.

In other words, of the possible variation which Curry first suggests, off of the extreme reading that the «could be» one end of the equation = - the one that just happens to have the maximum plausible natural variability that the IPCC could even reasonably conceive, in Curry's estimation, be exactly what the natural variability here in fact IS, but then from there goes extreme again, and concludes that within her own plus minus 20 % range — guess what — IT ALSO goes in the extreme direction, away from the mean of natural variability averaging out and the change we see is our influence (which assuredly it is not, but the point is it is impossible to pinpoint any small range, though Curry here does it anyway) so that in effect IT IS 50 % to 60 % (or 70 % when she adds on that «anthropogenic is 50 % or less.

And, the overall trend across all the recorded data is the same as its been since the end of the LIA, plus or minus an additional quasi-periodic variability with a cycle time of about 60 years, which also has been in existence since the end of the LIA.

But whether I go back 120 months from the very end, or 120 months from the end minus two months, the trends are both positive.

My rental company has informed me that their security deposit return policy - as per New York State law - is to return the deposit (minus applicable cleaning or maintenance fees) within 30 days of the end of the lease.

However, the big difference is that at the end of the term you get your premiums back with interest and minus any fees or charges along the way.

The plan returns all premiums, minus any fees, extra charges or premiums for optional riders paid by the policy owner at the end of the 20 - year term if no claim has been made.

Death Benefit: If the policyholder dies before the end of the policy term, the nominee shall be paid higher of the fund value or sum assured (minus partial withdrawals, if any) or the minimum death benefit that is 105 % of the total premium paid till the date of the death

Death Benefits: If the policyholder dies before the end of policy term, the nominee shall be paid the higher of the sum assured (minus partial withdrawals, if any) or the total fund value or 105 % of the total premiums paid till the date of the death

However, return of premium term insurance gives back to policyholders the amount of premiums paid at the end of the policy term, minus any administrative charges, fees or other costs.

Plus or Minus: Sony's high - end handset for 2015 is part spectacular flagship, part disappointing compromise.

* Awarded «Best Cashier 2012» for 12 months straight of cash register balance accuracy within plus or minus one dollar at end of every shift

We expect activity to end about flat this year; any movements will be nominal, at plus or minus 5 percent,» says Patrick Nutt, managing director at Calkain, a boutique net lease brokerage and advisory firm.