Sentences with phrase «or minus number»

Figuring out how decor can work is worse, since once again only some get a description while others simply have a chair icon with a plus or minus number attached to them which would presumably indicate how much they improve your party except that some things that would seem to match perfectly get a minus, and some that seem like a stupid choice have a plus.

Not exact matches

In addition to showing the estimated total population change in those areas between July 1, 2016 and July 1, 2017, the Census Bureau also included a breakdown of the components of that change, including net international migration, or the number of immigrants from other countries moving into a county minus the number of people leaving that county for another country.

The first problem here is that, minus signs or not, the fluctuating growth rates for the oldline churches (quite healthy growth during the postwar revival; decline during the 1970s; some recovery in the first half of the «80s) tell us little if they are not compared, and compared over a number of decades, with the growth rates for the conservative churches.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The NFL calculated a figure for every team based on the number of combined days of rest for their foes or for the team, calculating, for instance, in those two weeks, the Giants were a minus - 14 (minus - seven for each of the foes, Seattle and Denver, coming off byes).

To measure your premature baby's development, use his or her corrected age — your baby's age in weeks minus the number of weeks he or she was premature.

We have been approaching this very scientifically; we have been doing our own scientific polling and even some of the polling being done by independent people, the numbers are looking great and so I am confident that from what is being done scientifically, plus or minus any margin of error, we will make 50 % plus... «We are looking at issues of concern to people in different regions and so the campaign message is tailored to address the concerns we find in any particular region and the response we have got is very enthusiastic.

George Miller, who helped coin the term working memory, argued that seven, plus or minus two, is the maximum number of objects most of us can hold in our short - term memory at once.

While the stencil was handy, I eventually received the Letraset minus capital letters or numbers.

Analysis of retroviral recombinants formed after a single round of replication revealed that (i) the nonselected markers changed more frequently than expected from the rate of recombination of selected markers; (ii) the transfer of the initially synthesized minus strand strong stop DNA was either intramolecular or intermolecular; (iii) the transfer of the first synthesized plus strand strong stop DNA was always intramolecular; and (iv) there was a strong correlation between the type of transfer of the minus strand strong stop DNA and the number of template switches observed.

Yes, a lot of assumptions were made here (and I'm sure you could argue plus or minus 10 - 25 % for ANY of these numbers), but this hopefully puts it a bit in perspective - ~ 200 calories of glycogen is about 50 grams of carbohydrates, and given the body can synthesize around 15 - 20 grams of glycogen per hour, and is doing so during the workout from any food remaining in the gut, unless you haven't eaten in 12 hours you really only need ~ 30 additional grams of carbohydrates post workout, of which the body will use about 15 - 20 per hour to top off your stores.

For example: Create a MATH board, several numbers (one through ten) backed with hook and loop, a few plus and minus signs (or divide and multiply if you are at that level), and an equals sign.

In the 1950s George Miller wrote a famous article about the limitations of working memory called «The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two.»

(Remember the magical number seven, plus or minus two.)

That number is significant even with a margin of error of plus or minus 7.7 percent.

INCLUDES 1 Hands - On Standards Math Teacher Resource Guide Grade K with 43 lessons TOPICS Counting and Cardinality Counting On Counting 0 - 5 Number shapes Groups of 6 - 10 Estimate and count Arranging sets of objects Representing numbers with objects Comparing groups Equal groups More and fewer More than, less than, same as Order of numbers Operations and Algebraic Thinking Joining problems Using the plus and minus sign Separating problems Sums and differences to and from ten Decomposing numbers Number and Operations in Base Ten Compose and decompose numbers 11 - 19 Measurement and Data Nonstandard measurement of height Sorting by height and length Estimating and measuring length Sort by one or two attributes Determine the sorting rule Geometry Left and right Top, middle, and bottom Positions on a line Relative locations Inside and outside Before and after Plane shapes and real - life objects Geometric pictures and designs Attributes of plane shapes Cubes and spheres Exploring shape attributes Shape attributes riddles

The highest number correct, minus any incorrect responses, provide a standard score, which is quickly converted into a grade equivalent or age equivalent.

By providing the numbers and a place to put the plus or minus for the operation, these worksheet focus the students on the process rather than on the task of writing.

The font and margin controls are plus and minus buttons, so you can make things a little bigger or smaller without having to choose a particular number from a list.

The NAV is obtained by dividing the total value of all securities (minus any liabilities) in the fund by the total number of shares or units that are outstanding.

Basically a calculation of assets minus liabilities plus or minus the value of open positions when marked to the market, divided by the total number of outstanding units.

(2) From the group of borrowers identified under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the data manager identifies a sample that is large enough to derive an estimate, acceptable at a 95 percent confidence level with a plus or minus 5 percent confidence interval, for use in determining the number of borrowers who should be excluded from the calculation of the program cohort default rate due to improper loan servicing or collection.

Moody's uses numbers (1, 2, or 3) as modifiers; Standard & Poor's and Fitch use pluses and minuses.

The easiest way is simply to divide the intake number or adoption number by the human population of the jurisdiction served by the shelter minus three zeros.

For carbon - intensive electricity, all suppliers of electricity to end users would pay the fee, calculated based on the total number of kilowatt - hours sold to customers minus the kilowatt - hours for which the supplier has purchased renewable energy credits (RECs) or entered into long - term contracts for clean energy.

If your preferred number is quite different to that of any published expert you'd need to explain why that is, hopefully minus the terms «climategate» and / or «conspiracy».

bias ############ distortion, political motive ##### offset from an observation sign ########### indication, astrological sign ####### plus or minus sign values ########### ethics, monetary value ####### numbers, quantity manipulation ######### illicit tampering ######### scientific data processing scheme ############## devious plot ########### systematic plan anomaly ############# abnormal occurrence ###### change from long - term average

theory hunch, speculation scientific understanding uncertainty ignorance range error mistake, wrong, incorrect difference from exact true number bias distortion, political motive offset from an observation sign indication, astrological sign plus or minus sign values ethics, monetary value numbers, quantity manipulation illicit tampering scientific data processing scheme devious plot systematic plan anomaly abnormal occurrence change from long - term average

While the core science supporting AGW is sound, easily understandable and accepted even by a large number in the denialist camp (although not everyone), which is that the direct response to a doubling of CO2 from pre-industrial levels can be expected to increase global temperatures by approximately 1.2 C, plus or minus some small uncertainity.

Bringing it back to climate models, there can be strong agreement that 0.2 ºC / dec is the expected value for the current forced trend, but comparing the actual trend simply to that number plus or minus the uncertainty in its value is incorrect.

You can control volume or skip between songs by tapping or holding down the plus and minus buttons, access voice assistance with the microphone button, and even redial the last number you called by quickly double tapping the circular multifunction button.

For wholesale: Give them an offer of 70 % (or whatever number is appropriate locally) of the ARV and if this property needs any rehab, then minus repair costs and your margin = your offer price.