Sentences with phrase «or pacing back»

When your baby needs consoling, being able to rock or pace back and forth will be instrumental in soothing your little one.

Not exact matches

«When I made the difficult decision to cut expenses at Fab in mid-2013 I had essentially two options in front of me: keep growing at the pace we were growing and hope I could raise even more money down the road, or scale back and control our own destiny.

And then the second question for Sabrina, on the line of credit, and your appetite for buying the stock back here, is there a minimum cash balance or just kind of viewpoint as we look into next year, what your appetite could look like to be buying back stock at the pace you have the last couple of years?

Preston: [00:17:56] So what's so interesting here is that on one side we have Silicon Valley working at a rapid pace to create this new digital cryptocurrency and we also have governments and global authorities looking into the implications of using the similar technology whether it's the IMF or other central banks around the world that are that are talking about using some form of crypto to back their monetary baseline.

Bitcoin's pace of growth — plus the mere fact that as a digital currency it is not backed by a government or an army — makes more than a few analysts worry that this craze is due for another crash.

Sometimes success — the unquantifiable «momentum» that seems to infect players — jumps back and forth every few points or games, as if there were an immaterial rally happening at the same time but at slower pace.

Weissman preserves her artfully - paced narrative by placing the in - depth background information at the back of the book or in boxes, but still provides enough detail in the main text to clearly explain to readers unfamiliar with the coffee trade and the stakes involved.

Or perhaps to avoid too many changes, the young Spanish defender could come in at left back, where his pace might help him to compensate for his lack of experience.

If we go 433, or opt to go East / West / South and commit our outside backs too far forward while trying to boss the ball, rather than going North with pace on the counter — get ready for another tennis score to get hung on us.

Cech Holding, Mert, Monreal Bellerin, Xhaka, Ramsey, Gibbs Walcott or Ox, Sanchez, Welbeck 3,4,3 or the wingers and fullbacks can drop back, 5,4,1 Very defensive but nice pace on the counter and enough talent to control the tempo seeing as though Xhaka and Ramsey are finding some form and can make those long passes or push forward themselves.

Over the years I have watched him develop into a player that can win a game with his creativity and excellent pace or loose a game with the carelessness of not tracking back.

Not only did he lose 10 months of his career to that injury, but he's never gotten back his full open - field pace or ability to put on sudden bursts of acceleration in close quarters.

But if we intend on using pace with either Walcott or a new signing I suggest 4 -1-3-2 with Xhaka as the shield of the back four, Ozil in the centre, Cazorla on his left and Ramsey on the right with Sanchez and the new signing as the front 2.

I think this is a match for Welbeck or Ox because we need there pace down the sides despite the fact that they are not great finishers as walcott however, they track back and that's always a plus along with Alexis I also think Ramsey should not play this will be a very technical game so I would go with Ozil, santi and coq.

You need to have trust in your teammate, that's how Juventus do it, midfielders don't bust a gut if one or two opponents still have the back four and keeper to beat, they go at a constant but brisk pace.

Welbeck nearly caught Forster out with an inventive back heel and brought a good save with a header just before the break, but we were not making much use of his or anyone else's pace.

Welbeck I feel will be a huge player when back and if fully fit will terrorize defences with his and walcott pace, add Sanchez to the mix or even Ox, then it will be a potent frontline.

After seeing a couple of games where he featured and also the one for england he's got it all for me... 1) He has the physical ability to offer the kind of game that our Giroud offers (back to the net: deflecting, relaying passes and 1 - 2 touches) but also 2) Pace, mobility and technical agility to offer so much more: dribbling past opponents (creating space), running / turning over defences either to lay down the killing pass to a better placed player or finishing a through ball from our over talented midfield and all that with speed and 3) Tactical awareness, willingness to defend players if asked (like the game Man U-Real Madrid in the CL) and could provide support not only in the air on corners!!

Futhermore, theo is different frm all our attackers, he gives us something diffrnt, he has rarely played this season yet he has scored as many as our «hardworking ox» has scored all season, he assists more than any other winger in epl, the keep talk shit abt theo tracking back, the fact is, theo doesn't need to track back, when he plays, opposing fullbacks rarely push up field becus they are scared of his pace, so that leaves our fullback one on one with their winger, now, does our fullback need help frm theo to mark his man??? Only if that winger is Messi, Ronaldo or Robben, if they not either of those three and our fullback can not handle them, then he is not good enough for arsenal!

Perhaps it is the added pace of the Ox and with Alexis Sanchez on the other side that has convinced the boss to start with Giroud in the centre, or perhaps it is a reward for the way he has come back from that dip in form and scored vital goals from the bench.

I understand the logic behind your thinking and I agree, this could be lethal, but it then means wilshere ramsey flamini and arteta are bench players or have to be sold because none of them can operate as the sole midfielder in front of our back four, arteta is probably the most well rounded for this but against better opposition I don't think he has the physique or pace to really command that area, he has the intelligence to read the game but without the other attributes he can only do so much.

We need a new number 10 to replace Ozil We need a complete box to box midfielder with stamina and pace We need a new full back We need a new right back to challenge Bellerin We need a new goalkeeper to challenge or replace Cech We need a new central defender to replace Mertesacker / Mustafi / Gabriel

Bellerin has wing - back pace and even Monreal or Gibbs will not be exposed at LB with 3 at the back.

Would be nice not to have to watch Mertesacker bumbling around and have some real pace at the back Then either or both CB's could move forward for set plays.

I think for a while he should be used as an impact sub at RW or RM, like Monreal was last season to build his confidence back up, plus his pace will impact tired legs.

Giroud is not my ideal picture of an arsenal forward, his lack of pace is the main draw back, his goal scoring total is not anything to write home about or his occasional misses.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

He doesn't have the defensive awareness or pace to sit back and cover.

For example 4 -3-3 concentrate less on playing in the centre and attempting to dominate it as it's contest Arsenal will win and take advantage of the fact that the full backs haven't got pace, which normally means the defensive midfielders or center backs often end up doubling up on the wingers... thus clearing a space in the middle and allowing people like Ozil and Giroud to play to the strong points of their game.

I can't stand welbeck for one reason he's not better than what we have but if you played a front two of welbeck and Sanchez then Cambpell left and Walcott or chaimbo right that would give us a huge counter attacking style with lots of skill and pace, but here is the problem to do this you need big strong DM to win the ball back when we defend and we do t have them, flaming is reckless and getting old, Arteta is good on the Bala but not quick or strong enough, please don't say Diaby as we all know he will be inj soon again, then also what to do with Ozil and Corzola?

Until Lynch shows he can draft four starters with 5 picks like Pace just did, or get a top 3 running back with a 5th round pick, or find a top 10 SS in the 5th round I'll just assume Pace is the better evaluator of talent.

I have no doubt Theo would have brought some much needed pace and energy had he started in place of Giroud, or better yet leave Ramsey out move Cazorla back to his preferred role in the center further back next to Coq (which would reduce the need for Coq to attempt long range passes) and play Theo on his right wing spot and Ox on the left wing.

I've left Ox out because I just don't know if he'll be fit or not, I know Monreal has been in fine form lately however with Waker's pace down the right I'd have Gibbs at left back.

That's what I've been saying all season.With no natural wingers we must rely on the two full backs to give us the width.Monreal consistently hits the line and he has nowhere near the pace of Bellerin.His ability to go down the line has either been coached out of him or he just doesn't have the natural instinct anymore.And his crossing has never improved.Any decent offer in the summer and just get rid of him.His lack of improvement and progress is alarming and is down to Wenger and nobody else.

tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow creeps in this petty pace from day to day to the last syllable of endless gallic bullshit....4 th place junkies wetting themselves over 3rd place finish should realise that other teams will be strengthening in summer definitely the others in top 4 and always a surprise or two outside... wenger has f @@@@@ us over for ten years now selling top players and bringing in a string of jokers... yes that changed with ozil and sanchez... but giroud coquelin and monreal while all decent and can help us to another 4th place but not beyond that (coquelin could still be a top class player but ai nt there yet) walcott and podolski will never deliver and merteshaker would not be in any other top 15 team in europe... so the idea that the squad is on the cusp of greatness is moronic and confirmed by end of season performance... we need four quality signings but i would settle for two (attacker plus DM) and an upgrade (left back)..

Ramsay or Wilshire need to sit back or you get the best DM in the world, and pay for everything that brings; pace, ability to read the game, direct AR & JW, protect our defence, slow down attacks against us...

Walcott takes a little stick for similar reasons to poldi concerning defensive ability but Walcott does not go missing for 70 odd minutes and on the defensive side, he pins back defences or defenders due to his threat and pace.

and aoc is a winger or wing back who thrives on pace on the flank.

The lad has potential and considering his injuries, I think backup for RWB in new formation is fantastic, let's not forget wingbacks can use a lot of energy running back and forwards all the time so keeping Bellerin at peak could rely on someone like the Ox who can come on after 60 or 70 mins to inject pace and energy on the right.

Diaz bros are high volume high intensity fighters who keep the same pace for bloody 34 rounds, hence they expect the same from the opponent and when they saw (specially back then, pre-usada) juiced guys just holding them back without trying to go for a submission or anything, or running away constantly like what Conor was doing, they expected the other guy to get point deducted.

Whether it is Luke Shaw, Blind or Rojo at left back, the pace and movement of Theo Walcott should cause them all sorts of problems, while the centre backs will struggle to cope with the pace and skill of Alexis Sanchez or the physical challenge of Giroud.

I think it would also offer more freedom to our attack to be the attack, knowing they can pass the ball back safely to AMN or Wilshere who will not then just pass it back to CB, it could be that platform to build attacks on, pressing high and trusting in AMN pace.

He doesn't have the pace of Jose Bosingwa, the flair of Rafael da Silva, or the pure athletic ability of Micah Richards, but he is unquestionable one of the better right backs in the Premier League and a solid, consistent performer.

Against Florida, the Tigers proved that their offense's diminishing returns had nothing to do with «holding back» or pacing itself; LSU allowed just 237 yards and 14 points against Florida, and they sacked Gator quarterback Jeff Driskel five times in just 17 pass attempts, but the Tigers lost, 14 - 6.

His pace is good enough to get back for defence so he is not easily beaten for pace or trickery.

Song in the news really would not mind having him back, he is a more physical presence than flamini or Arteta, also more pace, another news item that podolski may go, if this does happen, a reus would be great but i would rather, a welbeck, ibarbo or even a Benteke who should be close to fitness, if u notice all the forwards chosen pacey, physical and direct

licence coach but you don't need that to see what wrong, we have arguably the strongest midfield In the country and a decent back 4 but the way we play doesn't get the best out of our players, I would play a front 3 of Sanchez welbeck and either chaimbo / Campbell Ozil / corzola / Ramsey just behind then Arteta and chambers as DM but when you play ozil or corzola wide we lose pace and cover for the fullback we have to many players who play No 10

Walcott is inj, if he was fit he would play right Sanchez left and welbeck up front, if Ramsey or Wiltshire would play DM I would pair them with Arteta, then ozil behind the striker just my opinion To play ozil or corzola wide is a waste of a player as they won't track back and have little pace

Between welbeck sanchez and chamberlain we have enough pace and creativity to either play it out from the back or play it long, but when we have seven players attacking the box and no one shielding the defence we're going to keep drawing and losing games

My choice would be Smalling, tall, has good pace, good in the air, offers flexibility in other positions and is english, just one major draw back he is injury prone, but i know he would improve with being pair up with Kos or Mert who have more experience and he is at the right age to start developing into a star.