Sentences with phrase «oral advocacy as»

-- that his career highlights the limitations of oral advocacy as an instrument of justice.

Not exact matches

It is quite one thing to learn civ pro, oral advocacy, noting up, and legal writing in a class room, but as articling students will testify, its a completely different thing in real practice.

«I would encourage all Law students to get involved in mooting as it helps develop legal research and oral advocacy skills.

I plan to blog my way through this experience as a way of reflecting upon and retaining what I'm learning — about legal research, writing and drafting, oral and written advocacy and what thinking like a lawyer means in an increasingly dynamic legal profession.

She routinely handles matters in the High Court and Court of Appeal, and impresses clients with the high quality of her written advice as well as her oral advocacy.

Learning to roadmap as you go is advanced oral advocacy — and one of the keys to getting the most from oral argument.

I have always described the practice area as corporate law without due diligence reviews, and litigation / oral and written advocacy without endless document discovery.

Throughout this Article, the term «legal writing» will be used as shorthand to refer to the required course (encompassing a two - semester course in the first year, and, increasingly, an additional semester in the second year, and sometimes, the third year) that covers written and oral communication, advocacy, legal research, analysis, and depending on the program, additional skills.

He volunteers annually as a judge for the Marshall - Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project, which includes an appellate advocacy competition for high school students, and as a judge at Drexel University Thomas E. Kline School of Law for first - year oral arguments in Legal Methods.

The appellate know - how of our group frequently takes us to other fora, where our skills in persuasive briefing and strong oral advocacy are equally applicable in different closed - record proceedings, such as administrative agency appeals (both state and federal), arbitration appeals, ERISA appeals, and bankruptcy appeals.

The Moot Court Honor Board consists of students who have participated on a regional or national team, as well as the top competitors from the three Ohio Northern University intra-school oral advocacy competitions.

In a series of interviews with legal writing expert Bryan Garner, Supreme Court Justices affirmed the importance of briefs to the appellate process and the need for lawyers to write clearly.7 In a recent study, Judge Richard Posner found that judges view writing as equally if not more important than oral advocacy.8 Continuing legal education programs offered by state bar associations frequently address the need for effective legal writing.9 No one disputes that lawyers should write well.10

All law schools have programs like Moot Court — which hones oral advocacy skills that help you in law as much as in life — and certificate tracks that allow you to declare a specialty, gain certification, and shape your direction as a lawyer.

While at law school, Owen won awards for his oral advocacy: with teammates, two Second Place Team awards at Canada's national Gale Cup Moot Competitions; the overall First Place Oralist as a member of Osgoode's winning side in the Goodman & Carr Cup «Baby Gale» first - year mooting competition; and a Distinguished Oralist in the Osgoode Lerners Cup.

Mock trial and moot court experience in law school is helpful as it allows the attorney to develop oral advocacy skills and gain trial experience in a simulated setting.

We continue to provide the specialist legal services the Bar has always offered — this includes drafting documents, giving written and oral advice as well as providing advocacy services for clients in courts, tribunals, arbitrations, mediations and any other situation where you are permitted to have someone speak on your behalf.

engage in high - level critical analysis (such as the ability to develop, understand and articulate policy arguments), engage in complex oral and written advocacy, and appreciate theoretical (jurisprudential) explications of the law;