«' Within just a few days, and in some instances a few hours, SocraticLaw can put at the litigator's computer desktop a searchable file of
oral argument transcripts relevant to the Court, the Judge, the opposing counsel, the issue - at - hand, and relevant motions,» added Mr. Scott.
The page includes a plain - English summary of the case, the questions presented, and links to blog commentary, the lower - court opinions,
the oral argument transcript, all briefs, the decision when issued, counsel for each party, and outside resources.
As Wexler notes in this post Monday on PrawfsBlawg, he conducted his research in his typical «half - assed fashion» (which included the ukulele distraction) by reviewing the Supreme Court's
oral argument transcripts and «count [ing] the number of times each justice said something funny enough to make the court reporter enter the phrase» [laughter]» in the transcript.»
This page includes a plain - English summary of the case, the questions presented, and links to blog commentary, the lower - court opinions,
the oral argument transcript, all briefs, the decision when issued, counsel for each party, and outside resources.
You can access the syllabus here; Justice Alito's opinion here; Justice Stephen G. Breyer's opinion concurring in the judgment here; Justice John Paul Stevens» dissenting opinion, in which Justices David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, here; and
the oral argument transcript here.
You can access
the oral argument transcript at this link.
You can access the opinion in Smith v. Texas, No. 05 - 11304, here and
the oral argument transcript here.
The oral argument transcript can be found here, and the recording can be found at Oyez.