Sentences with phrase «oral arguments by»

Both agencies acted with official city and state misconduct, and in both cases, honest, credible evidence was repeatedly dismissed and ignored, and so was the corruption that remains to date — where knowingly false statements were made to discredit me (then later completely reversed during oral argument by my accusers), and both the DOI investigators (who appeared at my doorstep many times to collect evidence) and MTA Office of the Inspector General investigators invited me back to their headquarters (more than six times), from 1989 to 2008), and continued to take no action to restore and reinstate my city job, pension and social security contributions.

These cases are decided after oral argument by written opinion.

Obtained summary judgment for employer, which was upheld after oral argument by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

For example, by showing a video of an actual oral argument by an experienced litigator, we may also be communicating that we expect an equally effective argument from our novice students.

Legal writing professors and continuing legal education providers should address head - on the nervousness many lawyers and law students experience around oral argument by introducing CBT principles as part of their teaching.

Not exact matches

The first oral arguments in the string of lawsuits filed against DOL's fiduciary rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

On June 29, the Court heard oral arguments on the motion to intervene made by two Coinbase customers, John Does 1 and 2.

Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments on Aug. 25 in the first hearing in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

At Wednesday's oral arguments, the court's conservative majority appeared to have the votes to allow the public prayers to continue in some form, but both sides expressed concerns about the level of judicial and government oversight over prayers presented by members of a particular faith.

At 2:15 p.m., Sen. Tony Avella and advocacy groups challenging the «Willets West» mall proposal begin their oral arguments followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps, New York State Supreme Court, 71 Thomas St., Room 210, Manhattan.

At the 3:28 - minute mark in the video that appears below, Gillibrand expressed disappointment that today's oral arguments on challenges to the health care reform law — Day One of what will be a three - day marathon — are not widely viewable by the general public.

At 10:15 a.m., leaders from New York's organized labor movement will hold a news conference as the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME, the latest in a series of attacks by the wealthy and corporate interests against ordinary working people, outside the Senate lounge, 3rd Floor, state Capitol, Albany.

Whereas Michael Boxer could have recommended immediate reinstatement that could have made me «whole» again, he chose to conclude his own internal report that was three years delinquent by stating that, «Serious questions are raised about Mr. Iritano and record falsification,» which was simply not true, and firmly supported by the Transit Authority's complete reversal of all misconduct allegations against me during oral argument in Appellate Court, Second Department, on May 9, 1991.

For three solid years, this city agency (and inspector general's office that is governed by New York State), continue to conceal evidence that could have restored my job, career, pension and retirement benefits, but chose to look the other way, while I had to spend tens of thousands of dollars defending myself in court for charges that never existed, and that were exposed to the MTA Inspector General after an oral argument hearing on May 9, 1991 revealed the deception and cover up.

Here's an interesting piece of trivia pointed out to me by a reader: Attorney Michael Carvin, who argued for the challengers during this week's marathon oral arguments on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act before the U.S. Supreme Court has a connection to the Senate Republicans.

At the end of the oral arguments, Fisher asked the plaintiffs to submit further written arguments concerning whether they have standing in the case, and on the «political question» — presumably, whether or not this is a matter to be decided by the courts or political system.

On June 29, 2006, a U.S. District Judge ordered both sides to submit proposed maps by July 14, respond to their opponents» maps by July 21, and be prepared to hold oral arguments on August 3.

BY LISA KEEN / Keen News Service FOURTH CIRCUIT SLUGFEST: Oral arguments Tuesday before the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals over Virginia's ban on same - sex marriage suggest the vote will almost certainly be 2 to 1 vote.

Hundreds of documents have now been filed by both sides, and after hearing these oral arguments on key points of contention, the judges are expected to make a ruling that could divide the intellectual property, give it all to one side, or even decide that neither party deserves the patents.

Australia's Full Federal Court this week began proceedings in an appeal of an earlier decision that upheld the validity of breast cancer diagnostic tests developed by Myriad Genetics — the same tests that were the subject of oral argument before the U.S. high court earlier this week.

The second thing we learned from today's oral argument is that public sector unions are, by their own counsel's admission, extortion rackets.

Josh Dunn, an associate professor of political science at the University of Colorado - Colorado Springs, joins EdNext Editor - in - chief Marty West to discuss the oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court on Monday, February 26, in Janus v. AFSCME.

Alan Rupe, an attorney representing public school districts and students in Kansas, is questioned by the media after making oral arguments on school finance to the Kansas Supreme Court on May 10 in Topeka.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer and seemed troubled by a Missouri grant program that bars state money from going to religious schools for playground improvement.

Yesterday, I was in the room as Hinds County Chancery Court Judge Dewayne Thomas heard oral arguments in the lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center attempting to shut down Mississippi's public charter schools.

On May 20, 2016, the Treasurer files a motion with Nevada Supreme Court requesting an expedited oral argument date of June 6 or 7 and decision by July 8.

Writing Task The Lesson Level Learning Goal for this task is: Construct and present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support the claim that activities such as deforestation or reforestation can cause changes in the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

That's precisely what occurred last week, when the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the motion by Rebecca Friedrichs» attorneys to decide her case (Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association) on the basis of the pleadings, without a trial or additional oral arguments.

Since the oral arguments took place, most news outlets, court watchers and even most union leaders have predicted that the court will side with Mark Janus, a public employee in Illinois who is required by state law...

On April 16, the New Hampshire Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Duncan v. State of New Hampshire, a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Americans United -LSB-...]

The farmers, State Rep. David Monson of Osnabrock and Wayne Hauge of Ray, observed the oral arguments made before Judge Daniel Hovland on their behalf by attorneys Tim Purdon and Joe Sandler.

I used to cover oral arguments and the outcome has nothing to do with the questions asked by the Justices.

Oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit begin at 9:00 am CST in the Warren E. Burger Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse at 316 North Robert Street in St. Paul and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.

Representative Monson will appear in court to observe oral arguments made on his behalf by attorneys Joe Sandler and Tim Purdon.

Oral arguments are set for June, allowing time for a decision by late summer and, no matter which way the circuit court rules, an appeal to the Supreme Court during the session that begins next October.

The farmers, State Rep. David Monson of Osnabrock and Wayne Hauge of Ray, will appear in court to observe oral arguments made on their behalf by attorneys Tim Purdon and Joe Sandler.

Oral arguments begin at 10:00 am CST in the William L. Guy Federal Building, located at 220 East Rosser Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota, and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.

They may prepare for questions by talking through the issues with a colleague, but this does not usually result in effective oral argument.

As Wexler notes in this post Monday on PrawfsBlawg, he conducted his research in his typical «half - assed fashion» (which included the ukulele distraction) by reviewing the Supreme Court's oral argument transcripts and «count [ing] the number of times each justice said something funny enough to make the court reporter enter the phrase» [laughter]» in the transcript.»

The answer to that question isn't obvious at all; indeed, it's the subject that the Supreme Court took up yesterday at oral argument in KSR International v. Teleflex and covered by Tony Mauro in this article, Justices Slam Nation's Patent System (Law.com, 11/29/06).

Court spokesperson David Madden said this was by far the largest audience for an oral argument since the court began live streaming two years ago.

Fox excerpts some of the questions tossed out by the justices at oral argument and cites press coverage of the decision.

The court posts video of oral arguments after each hearing on the court's own YouTube channel and provides recordings of all oral arguments on the court's website by noon the following day.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court kicked off its 2012 - 13 term by hearing oral arguments in a number of cases.

The program, called «Making the Oral Argument: The View from the Inside Out,» is an ABA video accompanied by a handbook.

More importantly, Reeve made an important step in skills training: he introduced formal moot courts as a part of the Litchfield curriculum, though on an optional basis.53 Initially, the students themselves conducted the moots, though by 1803, when James Gould was teaching at Litchfield, he presided over the arguments.54 The rules Gould imposed for the moots required not only oral argument, but also written argument, because the litigants had to produce writs and pleadings as well.55 Although a far cry from modern legal writing programs, these moot courts at least endeavored to provide some practical training in the production of persuasive writing.56

The tape then presents the oral argument, followed by a panel discussion reflecting on the argument.

When students argue in a brief or oral argument that a particular precedent should be followed, they engage in reasoning by analogy.102

If requested by a party, the Court grants oral argument, although it may direct that a case will be considered on the briefs without oral argument.

Judges will sit as the Supreme Court to hear oral arguments presented by two person teams.