Sentences with phrase «oral decision from»

So said the Supreme Court of Canada in its unanimous oral decision from the bench on November 12, 2014, agreeing with the British Columbia Teachers» Federation (BCTF).

Not exact matches

Interesting changes though — Just before the Federal Circuit oral arguments in this case, the PTO Solicitor withdrew its support from the PTAB's original decision and provided notice that the PTO is actively reconsidering its approach to claim construction and indefiniteness.
Results from a study published online in the Journal of Pediatrics hold the potential to substantially improve clinical decision - making to determine when a premature newborn is ready for oral feeding.
Decision is yours, whether you like to explore your sexual fantasies with your online dating partner or just feel happy from oral sexual conversation only.
Oral and written requests from employees are considered received when made to the decision - maker, any manager in the employee's chain of command, their OA office of HR or CR, DOHRM, or DOCR.
A strong understanding and firm commitment to the mission of BYU, proven maturity, and good judgment Superior oral and written communication skills Superior interpersonal skills with both peers and subordinates Ability to manage and supervise highly skilled, motivated and independent professional employees Understanding of and sensitivity to the non-legal ramifications of strategic legal decisions Outstanding analytical, interpersonal, problem - solving and research skills Proficiency in common computer programs and web - based applications Ability to work closely and effectively with high - level university administrators Involvement with professional associations Current bar license from applicable state licensing agency Preferred:
and Semelhago v. Paramadevan [1996] 2 S.C.R. 415: For which see Siebrasse's critique, which interestingly quotes from oral argument an exchange between Gonthier J and John Swan as counsel., where the court's decision was based on a line of reasoning and authorities that were found nowhere in the appellant's or respondent's factums and were never canvassed in oral argument.
Linden was devastated and thought his career was effectively over, especially after the incident drew media attention and Judge Bolsby gave oral reasons for his decision to have Linden removed from court — and then sent a copy of those reasons to the Criminal Law Quarterly, which published them in their entirety.
In contrast to previous decisions concerning random testing, the Court found that oral swabs were capable of detecting impairment from drug use.
It was Alito's first written opinion this term, Kimberly Atkins at DC Dicta notes, adding, «The decision was not entirely surprising, given the comments from the justices during oral arguments in the case.»
If you want your brain to implode, try reading today's decision in NAMUDNO next to a transcript of the oral argument from last April.
In the costs decisions arising from the certification of the class proceedings styled Sankar v. Bell Mobility, Brown v. Canada (Attorney General), Crisante v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Dugal v. Manulife Financial, and Rosen v. BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., Belobaba noted, in general, the amount of time spent by legal counsel was too high, the volume of material filed with the court was excessive, oral hearings were too long, and counsel over-litigated most issues.
This makes sense from the perspective of the court itself, and in the context of the Aboriginal oral tradition, but it concerns me that the main method for communicating information about courts» decisions and the way they are distributed to influence other courts» judgments is in the form of printed judgments.
If a tribunal's decision may turn on findings of fact made from conflicting evidence or on the credibility of witnesses, there may be a right to an oral hearing and cross-examination of those witnesses.
Something has to be done, but many practitioners will suggest that the oral renewal process is a vital fallback upon refusal on paper and will feel aggrieved that the problems and proposed restrictions actually derive from other policy decisions which gain no mention.
«On August 30, 2007, the trial court rendered a comprehensive seventy - six page oral decision, which included the following findings and conclusions: «Dr. Kagel believed and believes the [plaintiff] is consciously or unconsciously alienating [the child] from his father or coaching [the child]....
No - fault divorce laws were adopted beginning with California in 1969 and then spread to all 50 states.5 During the 1960s and 1970s, legal access to birth control including oral contraceptives became increasingly available, and in 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court made abortion legal in the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.6 These cultural changes created new opportunities for women and led to an increased presence in the labor market, doubling from 30.3 million in the 1970s to 72.7 million in the mid - 2000s.7
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z