The Lawyer's Daily states that concerns are being raised about the seemingly growing number of
oral judgments from the SCC.
Not exact matches
A strong understanding and firm commitment to the mission of BYU, proven maturity, and good
judgment Superior
oral and written communication skills Superior interpersonal skills with both peers and subordinates Ability to manage and supervise highly skilled, motivated and independent professional employees Understanding of and sensitivity to the non-legal ramifications of strategic legal decisions Outstanding analytical, interpersonal, problem - solving and research skills Proficiency in common computer programs and web - based applications Ability to work closely and effectively with high - level university administrators Involvement with professional associations Current bar license
from applicable state licensing agency Preferred:
The first being an initial motion for directions
from the judge, the second being the actual argument of the summary
judgment motion and the third being a second hearing involving viva voce evidence, should the motions judge decide that
oral evidence is necessary.
Maintaining its commitment to online access to justice, the UK Supreme Court is now uploading to YouTube
oral summaries of its
judgments from the Bench.
This makes sense
from the perspective of the court itself, and in the context of the Aboriginal
oral tradition, but it concerns me that the main method for communicating information about courts» decisions and the way they are distributed to influence other courts»
judgments is in the form of printed
judgments.
Last month, the Supreme Court of Canada («SCC») delivered a single - paragraph
oral judgment in the matter of R v Day, 2014 SCC 74, dismissing an appeal
from the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal («NLCA»), 2014 NLCA 14 [Day].
Aside
from the apparent procedural novelties involved in compelling an affidavit (or
oral testimony) for its summary
judgment motion (where recent SCC jurisprudence favouring summary
judgment may assist), there is the added complexity of compelling the patent examiner (or another CIPO representative) to provide specific evidence regarding a particular patent.
In an
oral judgment given on November 15, Clark J. concluded that the child was in danger of being alienated
from his mother by the actions of his father.
Hampton Realty v. Conklin (220 A.D. 2d 385)- issues of justifiable reliance and reasonable inquiry; motion for a leave to appeal denied (87 N.Y. 2d 805); non-jury trial
judgment in favor of broker for commission reversed; broker not the procuring cause where purchaser and seller discussed availability of property prior to listing and where broker did nothing of any significance to assist in the negotiations between buyer and seller aside
from a single visit to the property; facts of the case do not support
oral promise to «protect» the broker's commission; reasonable duration for term of brokerage agreement implied where agreement contained no term as to its duration and, under the circumstances of the case, it would not be reasonable to extend the duration of the agreement for a term of more than one year.