What if
oral submissions to court were the exception rather than the rule?
Not exact matches
Justice Tetteh Charway has given both parties up
to Friday the 28th of this month
to file the documents after which they will return
to the
court on Monday
to give
oral submissions.
Actors use the rehearsal space
to practise their delivery in front of their fellow performers and, in a similar fashion
to barristers during their
oral submissions in
court, modify the delivery of their lines in response
to feedback in rehearsal.
He is currently instructed as leading counsel in the case of Banger (Unmarried Partner of British National: South Africa)[2017] UKUT 125 (IAC)(30 March 2017), which will be considered on 17th January 2018 in the
Court of Justice of the European Union after successful submissions that an oral hearing is necessary to determine the questions referred to the Court and having won in the domestic c
Court of Justice of the European Union after successful
submissions that an
oral hearing is necessary
to determine the questions referred
to the
Court and having won in the domestic c
Court and having won in the domestic
courtcourt.
Before taking new matters into account based on statistics which have not been considered in the judgment under appeal, the adversarial process requires that the
court ensure that the parties are given an opportunity
to deal with the new information by making further
submissions,
oral or written, and allowing, if requested, fresh material in response.
The UK Supreme
Court last week handed down its 5 - 2 split decision upholding the extradition of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange
to Sweden, but later the same day the
Court issued a «Further Statement» explaining it had granted Assanges's lawyer 14 days
to apply re-open the appeal for further written or
oral submissions.
The Judicial Compensation Commission, which was formed in 2013, announced this week it has scheduled a hearing Oct. 7 - 10 at the Edmonton Law
Courts to gather
oral submissions.
In accordance with the Order, ARL will be filing a factum and be given an opportunity
to make
oral submissions before the
Court on January 15, 2018.
When an individual, group or body is given leave
to intervene in a case, they usually submit a written argument (called a factum) and are also given permission
to make a brief
oral submission to members of the
court.
As a final comment, notwithstanding the error noted by the
Court of Appeal («In the normal course, someone on the acquisition team would have been assigned responsibility for determining whether financial instruments that gave a lender the right
to veto a change - of - control existed and, if there were, communicating with the lender
to ascertain its position»)(see para. 22, FN 18), the
Court acknowledged counsel's «excellent»
oral and written
submissions on appeal — even stating that the interests of the parties «could not have been better served».
Mr. Petrie did not intend
to address the standard of review at all in his
oral submission before the Supreme
Court of Canada.
The
Court noted that credibility issues «almost inevitably arise in antagonistic employer - employee relations» and that the power in the statute
to proceed by written
submissions would be «rendered completely meaningless and deprived of Parliament's intended effect» if
oral hearings were required whenever credibility issues arose.
On February 17, 2015 the
Court of Appeal dismissed Ms. Sampley's appeal, a finding that was not unexpected given the
Court's direction
to Respondent's counsel during the hearing,
to make
oral submissions only with respect
to the issue of domestic violence.
Furthermore, unless otherwise prescribed by statute, the content of input rights (i.e. written
submissions vs.
oral hearing) is at the discretion of the decision - maker subject
to the supervisory role of the
court to review the propriety of that choice.
The BCCLA is in intervener in the case and will make
oral submissions urging the
Court to apply a stringent evidentiary standard when considering limits on individuals» fundamental rights.
To expedite its business, the
court may make provision by rule or order for the
submission and determination of motions without
oral hearing upon brief written statements of reasons in support and opposition.