Not exact matches
Richard was correct to put that apple to
orange comparison out of its misery before it
went to far.
Experience some ups and downs, or in Tennessee's case, play at a level that has you ranked as low as 102nd in Pomeroy's rankings as late as mid-February, and you're
going to put your fate into the hands of a committee that is weighing quite a few different factors and making a lot of apples - to -
oranges (Tennessee vs La Salle, for instance)
comparisons.
Now, my issue with the above is that it is
going beyond the apple and
oranges comparison.
While not an apples to apples (or
oranges to
oranges)
comparison, the slow and steady DIY investor crowd tends to ask about the value of
going with one or the other of these low - cost providers.
During the program, Beck put forth an apples - to -
oranges comparison by suggesting that the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report contradicts Gore's statement in An Inconvenient Truth, that if the West Antarctic or Greenland ice sheets were to break up or melt, «sea level worldwide would
go up 20 feet»:
In many respects I believe that comparing ebooks and print remains an apple and
orange type
comparison, they are different experiences each with their own merit and demerits, similarly I don't think print is
going to disappear quite yet.
Yes, it's an apple to
oranges comparison but it shows just how powerful the new iPhone is
going to be.