But some time around 850,000 years ago, the cycle grew to 100,000 years, and ice sheets reached greater extents than they had in several million years — a change too great to be explained by
orbital variation alone.
Not exact matches
Scafetta and West want the
orbital forcing
alone to explain all of the ice age
variations?
If some scientists built a countering hypothesis tying in the current stand
alone challenges solar and
orbital variations, mistakes in data, etc, I believe it would help to advancing understanding by encouraging two things.