Sentences with phrase «order against a solicitor»

Not exact matches

And it is singularly unattractive to argue that confidentiality should be recognised by the law in order to protect the interests of a solicitor against whom an adverse finding has been made.

The consultation paper states that in these cases it would be open for the solicitor to seek a costs order against the opponent.

Bill of Costs Bill of Costs (Tariff Items) Consent Form 18 Requisition — General Form 41 Subpoena Form 52.2 Certificate Concerning Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses Form 80A Affidavit Form 91 Direction to Attend Form 124A Notice of change of solicitor Form 146A1 Affidavit of service Form 146A2 Affidavit of service — Personal Service Form 146B Solicitor's Certificate of Service Form 149 Tender of Payment into Court Form 171A Statement of claim Form 171B Statement of defence Form 171C Reply Form 171D Counterclaim against parties to main action only Form 171E Counterclaim against plaintiff and person not already party to the main action Form 171F Defence to Counterclaim Form 171G Reply to defence to counterclaim Form 171H Third Party Claim against a person already party to the action Form 171I Third Party Claim against a person not already party to the action Form 171J Third Party Defence Form 171K Reply to Third Party Defence From 223 Affidavit of Documents Form 255 Request to Admit Form 256 Response to Request to Admit Form 258 Request for Pre-Trail Conference Form 301 Notice of Application Form 305 Notice of Appearance — Application Form 314 Requisition for Hearing — Application Form 337 Notice of Appeal Form 341A Notice of Appearance — Appeal Form 344 Certificate of Completeness of Appeal Book Form 347 Requisition for Hearing — Appeal Form 359 Notice of Motion Memorandum of Fact and Law Model Bifurcation Order Model Jeopardy Order Motion Record Notice of Consent to Electronic Service Solicitor's Certificate of Expert Witness

In RP a mother, who had been represented throughout care and placement order proceedings by the official solicitor, appealed against the making of the placement order on the ground, among others, that she had not had a fair trial as the case advanced on her behalf did not accord with her instructions.

HHJ Collender QC, who made the costs decision, placed considerable reliance on the following facts in making a wasted costs order against the claimant solicitor:

They can impose an order under s. 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (against an employee of a solicitor) meaning they are unable to work in any SRA regulated firm without the permission of the SRA.

The Court of Appeal found in Harris v. Levine that the plaintiff's suit against his former criminal defence counsel was an abuse of process because in order to succeed, the plaintiff would have had to prove that but for the solicitor's negligence, he would not have been convicted.

The Court of Appeal set aside1 a trial court order awarding costs to the Township of Russell against a solicitor personally, pursuant to Rule 57.07 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Justice Templeton ordered that the plaintiff was precluded from commencing any litigation against the solicitors without leave of the court.

The plaintiff then moved before Rady, J. for an order setting aside the order of Templeton, J., and to commence a new action against solicitor B. Rady, J. dismissed both motions, and found the plaintiff to be in contempt of court.

In C Plc v P (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening)[2007] EWCA Civ 493, [2007] 3 All ER 1034, the Court of Appeal found that where self - incriminating, independent materials had been discovered, following the execution of a search order, and had been handed over to a computer expert by the solicitor supervising the search order, they were not covered by the privilege against self - incrimination.

According to Master in Chambers S.L. Schulz, «If Alberta had maintained that claim I would have granted the double costs award sought, or ordered solicitor and own client indemnity costs against Ms. Greter.»

Our expert medical negligence solicitors will investigate how and why your loved one's suicide was allowed to take place in order to bring a claim against those responsible.

Our passionate and committed team of solicitors — which works closely with our renowned Public Order / Criminal law team — have extensive experience in bringing and winning difficult, controversial and high profile cases, and we are dedicated to defending the right to protest against injustice.

He also ordered special costs against the lawyers, including $ 41,000 paid to the computer analyst and a supervising solicitor who oversaw the search warrant.

What, then, is the legal basis for the claim against the solicitor, and what would the client have to prove in order to establish an entitlement to recover substantial (as opposed to nominal) damages?