Sentences with phrase «order case which»

Unlike a first - order case which may go by default, an uncontested appeal will still have to have some sort of a hearing; you are, after all, saying that a court decision should be set aside, and the Respondent's views are not necessarily relevant.

Not exact matches

There's the third, more realistic action, which is you have to get some sort of production order of the data at Uber as evidence in a court case.

Just recently, IBM has partnered up with food giants which include Nestle and Unilever, along with stores such as WalMart in order to implement Blockchain in an effort to reduce rising cases of food contamination.

Fraternities and sororities are overseen by their national, or in DKE's case international, organization, which aims to keep chapters across the country in order and revoke privileges when issues arise.

Still, experts said those comments were likely to hurt the government's case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard arguments on Tuesday night over whether the TRO should be upheld while the order's legality is established.

Expert Market also noted that earlier this month, the U.K. government ordered thousands of companies to disclose information such as employee salaries and titles to suss out cases in which women are being underpaid within organizations.

Not yet profitable, it is deploying the $ 95 million it raised earlier from investors like Danny Meyer and Steve Case to build powerful systems for siting and planting new stores, forging supple regional supply chains, and developing technology for mobile ordering and cashless transactions, with which it is experimenting.

One question in the current case is likely to be which, if any, of Trump's statements should be admissible in examining the administration's motives in issuing the order.

The other is that customers can only leave margin positions open for a relatively short period of time — 27 days in the case of GDAX — which means those betting on a fall in bitcoin need it to tumble in short order, or else they will have to cover the price increase.

Some companies provide information willingly, in which case not even a court order is needed.

Lifeproof cases, which start at $ 80, are required in order to use this armband.

Perhaps the best - case scenario is simply for the S&P 500 to hold at convergence of its recent low and 50 - day moving average, which may actually be a tall order if the NASDAQ continues to sell off and weigh the broad market down.

A spokesperson for Microsoft, which seeks reimbursement from the government on a case - by - case basis, said: «Microsoft only complies with court orders because it is legally ordered to, not because it is reimbursed for the work.

In the case of bankruptcy there there is an order in which bonds get re-paid.

In the case that you pass, the policy beneficiaries should file a claim with the insurer, after which point the circumstances of your death will be reviewed and receive the payout (also called a death benefit or the face value of the policy) so long as everything is in order.

Though there are some cases in which a lender can require you to provide proof of life insurance in order to secure a loan, they can not mandate that you purchase coverage through them.

In all cases, though, you will need to show at least one account which has been reporting a payment history for at least six months in order for the bureaus to have enough data to calculate a score.

But in this case, the system uses a combination of prior maps as well as the lidar, which sends out a signal and gathers data on the range and intensity of objects in its path and around it in order to determine where the vehicle is driving in real time.

A process which is becoming more ordered is exothermic and it occurs at a sufficiently low enough temperature., as in the case of a snowflake.

Hence, even in this highly complex case, it is the collective agency of the entire structured society or overall field of activity which is at work to support a «thread of personal order» among the living occasions.

He takes the same view of them as Polanyi: they are rooted in Scientific Positivism: «In either case we have a monistic philosophy which includes everything within an order of scientific empiricism.»

In order to give concreteness to our analysis of the religious aspect of experience, I introduce here a case study which has become publicly available and which has some universal aspects.

In any case, when Shaull resumes a theological point of view he rediscovers in a theology the theses mentioned above: Christianity is revolutionary, it deconsecrates, it orients us toward a future that is always to be created, messianism must not be forgotten on earth, and the kingdom of God is a dynamic reality which judges the social order.

And the religious response to this suspicion is in each case the same: the formulation, by means of symbols, of an image of such a genuine order of the world which will account for, even celebrate, the perceived ambiguities, puzzles and paradoxes of human experience.

What if, as I believe is true in the present case, policies and court orders invite the doing of that which virtue would inhibit, even if it can not always effectively prohibit?

In the case of human mentality, we maintain that the requisite order is supplied by a vast reservoir of unconscious temporal societies, which sustain its higher initiatives.

But if this is the case what are we to make of those several passages in which Whitehead speaks variously of an «inevitable ordering of things, conceptually realized in the nature of God» (PR 244, italics added, or of «the eternal order which is the final absolute wisdom» (PR 347, italics added)?

Yet since the account of substance offered is of a route of occasions or a personally ordered society of selves rather than of, say, a changing continuant, the objection may be raised that this atomization of substance involves an enormous multiplication of entities which in the case of selves at least goes well beyond necessity — though this would have to be shown.

It is hard to remember which term it was since the picture uses them interchangeably in order to make sure that God is not displeased, in case he is watching.

Without minimizing the great complexity of issues in most concrete cases, which make snap judgments out of order, some principles can be affirmed.

The whole neo-orthodox case against the liberal doctrine that the orders of this world can be transformed into the Kingdom of love rests ultimately on two propositions about the actual situation of man in nature and in society, which we need carefully to examine.

If this is so, then it is true enough that no one exists who can help him — in case he actually should venture out — and that which a clever ingenious imagination invents in order to be able to forget the troublesome background of evasion above the terrifying foreground, actually comes to pass.

This is an application to the special case of the soul of the general principle by which social order is defined.

This cosmic ordering can not be simply temporal, for in that case we face two equally unacceptable alternatives: (1) Suppose God changes his ordering from time to time, according to which possibilities are judged to be better or worse.

Instead of the Sermon's provision for cases at law, for the exercise of charity, for civic virtue, presupposing if at the same time reinterpreting the requirements of the ancient national code; instead of the Old Testament Law with its provisions for the inheritance of property, for various kinds of civic and social duties, albeit of a primitive order, which the Sermon presupposes, (Matt.

Hence in order to stress this wider environment of human decision and action, I wish to make a case for the development of a theology which, by design, is concerned with the theory and practice of Christian biopolitics.

In the next chapter I shall present a case study of a mid-nineteenth-century version of the «Athens» type that was highly honored, at least verbally, in some mid-twentieth-century discussions of higher education generally, in order to draw attention to ways in which the material modifications it introduced have proved to be problematic.

One rather begins with the Creator and the order of creation («Nature and Nature's God»)- in the case of the Founders, the biblical God, even if for Jefferson and a few others attenuated by Enlightenment rationalism - from which understanding certain truths are established as self - evident.

In the extreme case, it suggests religious phenomena in which one enters a trance state in order that the divine Spirit may take over one's vocal cords and muscles.

This, then, is a case in which arguments about world order can at most enhance our interpretation of more proximate effects.

But in any case, it is clear that Whitehead means that there are various levels of «organisms of organisms,» or hierarchical societies, which are to be contrasted with those types of societies which do not have a hierarchical order and hence no overall unity of activity.

It is not the case that we must reduce myth to some modern, nonmythological conceptuality such as Heideggerian existentialism (which, after all, escapes neither Marxist, Nietzschian, and Freudian suspicion nor the contemporary conflict of interpretations) in order to be grasped by what it is saying.

The Kingdom of God is a reality here and now, but can be perfect only in the eternal order... The primary principle of Christian Ethics and Christian Politics must be respect for every person simply as a person... The person is primary, not the society; the State exists for the citizen, not the citizen for the State... freedom is the goal of politics... Freedom, Fellowship, Service — these are the three principles of a Christian social order, derived from the more fundamental Christian postulates that Man is a child of God and is destined for a life of eternal fellowship with Him... Love... finds its primary expression through Justice — which in the field of industrial disputes means in practice that each side should state its own case as strongly as possibly it can before the most impartial tribunal available...

It is true, as Hall points out, that for Whitehead ordering principles are «immanent» within particular occasions (see UP 261 - 70), but in most cases those ordering principles also reflect the «mutual relations» of individuals, as well as the «community in character» pervading groups or societies of individuals (AI 142).13 This is particularly true of persons: the relations between occasions which constitute the human body and brain, and the «community of character» of the succession of personal experiences, give an essential element of unity to human experience.

It is up to the Christian communities to analyze with objectivity the situation which is proper to their own country, to shed on it the light of the gospel's unalterable words and to draw principles of the church... It is up to these Christian communities, with the help of the Holy Spirit, in communion with the bishops who hold responsibility and in dialogue with other Christian brethren and all men of good will, to discern the options and commitments which are called for in order to bring about the social, political and economic changes seen in many cases to be urgently needed.

In that case the outcome of an occasion would be prior to its origin, even though the origin is temporally earlier, since like all other phases the initial phase depends upon the completed occasion But if this is not so, what is the additional meaning assigned to prior and subsequent which is not discoverable in the concept of an order of dependence?

The question might seem a befuddling one for a ballot in the heartland, but it stems from a New Jersey legal case in which a Muslim woman went to a family court asking for a restraining order against her spouse claiming he had raped her repeatedly.

Let's consider something: if in the atheist existential case we can admit that in order to achieve outcomes which we desire we often have to pay a steep price for the sake of achieving what we intend to achieve, why must this be ruled out in the case of God?

In cases for which reactant and product (A, B, P, Q) concentrations are not held constant but are allowed to follow the usual (nonlinear) equations which govern ordinary diffusion, development of spatial order is to be expected, if the chemical equations of the Brusselator apply.

If this is the case, then is there not a sense in which query could play a role in ordering all specific aims and purposes?