Sentences with phrase «order joint decision»

If the court doesn't order joint decision - making responsibility for some reason, such as if there's a history of domestic violence between parents, a non-custodial parent still has certain rights.

Not exact matches

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.

An order for joint custody may specify one home as the primary residence of the child and designate one parent to have sole power to make decisions regarding specific matters while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for other matters.

The head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, responsible for carrying out orders to kill suspects on the list, no longer contributes to the decision of whether or not to kill them.

The north of England deferred only two academy order decisions, but one of these was a joint application from six Catholic primary schools applying to form the South Cumbria Catholic MAT.

OTTAWA — August 11, 2017 — The Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (CFHS) congratulates Transport Canada and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans on its joint decision to impose a mandatory slowdown order on large ships in the Gulf of St. Lawrence to protect the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale from fatal ship strikes.

The group sued Cooper Union's administration and in 2015 announced in a joint statement with the school the decision of Cooper Union to return, in short order, to a tuition - free policy.

Form FL - 1 — Statement of Claim for Divorce Form FL - 2 — Statement of Claim for Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 3 — Statement of Claim for Divorce and Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 4 — Statement of Defence Form FL - 5 — Counterclaim for Divorce Form FL - 6 — Counterclaim for Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 7 — Counterclaim for Divorce and Division of Matrimonial Property Form FL - 8 — Joint Statement of Claim for Divorce Form FL - 10 — FLA Claim Form FL - 11 — Response — Family Law Act Form FL - 12 — Certificate of Lawyer Form FL - 13 — Protection Order Questionnaire Form FL - 14 — Restraining Order Application Form FL - 15 — Notice to Produce an Affidavit of Records Form FL - 16 — Notice to Reply to Written Interrogatories Application Form FL - 17 — Notice to Disclose — Application Form FL - 18 — Family Application Form FL - 19 — Provisional Order Information Form FL - 20 — Notice of Confirmation Hearing Form FL - 21 — Request for Divorce (Without Oral Evidence) Form FL - 22 — Joint Request for Divorce (Without Oral Evidence) Form FL - 23 — Affidavit of Applicant Form FL - 24 — Affidavit of Applicants (Joint) Form FL - 25 — Divorce Judgment (without oral evidence) Form FL - 26 — DJ and Corollary Relief Order Form FL - 27 — Corollary Relief Order Form FL - 28 — Variation Order Form FL - 29 — Exclusive Possession Order Form FL - 30 — Restraining Order Without Notice Form FL - 31 — Restraining Order Form FL - 33 — Notice of Appeal — Provincial Court Order (Family Law Act) Form FL - 34 — Adult's Statement — Guardianship of Child Form FL - 35 — Child's Statement — Guardianship of Child Form FL - 36 — Statement — Terminate Guardianship Form FL - 37 — Statement — Review of Guardian's Significant Decision Form FL - 38 — Statement — Court Direction Form FL - 39 — Statement — Parenting Form FL - 40 — Statement — Parenting (Sole Guardian) Form FL - 45 — Statement — Child Support Form FL - 46 — Recipient's Statement — Vary Child Support Form FL - 47 — Payor's Statement — Vary Child Support Form FL - 48 — Statement — Spousal Partner Support Form FL - 49 — Recipient's Statement — Vary Spousal Partner Support Form FL - 50 — Payor's Statement — Vary Spousal Partner Support Form FL - 51 — Statement — Enforcement of Time With a Child Summary of Child Support Guideline Undue Hardship Claim

One that irks me, as often as not, is the continued refusal of some judges in this province to understand that statute, common law, and principle, in cases where a defendant's liability is proportional (several, only) not solidary (i.e. joint), requires them, in order to get make the correct decision — the correct decision is important, right?

The temporary joint legal decision - making order situation made it clear a permanent co-parenting arrangement was not in the children's best interests.

This can manifest itself in unexpected change orders, requests for additional funds for operational support, expansion of scope or other increased costs arising out of the joint decision of the parties.

In 2012 our legislature enacted S.C. Code § 63-15-230 (C), which reads, «If custody is contested or if either parent seeks an award of joint custody, the court shall consider all custody options, including, but not limited to, joint custody, and, in its final order, the court shall state its determination as to custody and shall state its reasoning for that decision.»

If the court orders joint legal custody, both parents will also have the right to make decisions about the child's school, religious upbringing, and extracurricular activities.

The court may order joint custody — both parents share custody — or sole custody to one parent, and must decide joint or sole custody as to both legal custody (the right to make decisions about a child's welfare) and physical custody (the right to have a child live with you).

The RTT - ELC grant brought together teams from the Children Youth & Families Department, the Public Education Department and the Department of a Health around joint planning and decision in order to align the various Early Learning programs.

Courts often order that the parents share legal custody of their toddler, called joint legal custody, meaning that both parents have the legal ability to make these important decisions.

Joint legal custody is usually ordered by the court to give parents equal say regarding important decisions made on behalf of the children.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

New Hampshire Statute 461 - A: 5 instructs state judges that «except as provided in Paragraph III [which «refers to abuse and neglect where the decisions of such a parent are clearly not in the best interest of the child»], in the making of any order relative to decision - making responsibility, there shall be a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint decision - making responsibility is in the best interest of minor children.»

Kansas courts prefer to order joint legal custody whenever possible, so divorced parents usually have equal rights to make major decisions regarding their children.

Courts generally prefer that parents share decision - making when at all possible, ordering joint legal custody.

Joint legal custody is a court order that ensures each parent has an equal right in making decisions regarding routine medical issues, education, and any other area that affects the welfare of the child.

Without a custody order in place, the parents have joint custody, meaning either parent may make decisions for the child or provide a home for the child.

When there is more than one adult in a family, those who have primary responsibility for raising the children need to make joint decisions about the children and face and resolve any differences they have in order to do so.

When the relationship between a couple keeps parents from resolving differences respectfully in order to make joint decisions impacting their children's lives, children are hurt.

Once a court issues an order for joint legal and physical custody, both parents must make legal custody decisions together and adhere to the physical custody arrangements.

A proposed joint physical care parenting plan 20 shall address how the parents will make decisions affecting the child, how the parents will 21 provide a home for the child, how the child's time will be divided between the parents and 22 how each parent will facilitate the child's time with the other parent, arrangements in 23 addition to court ordered child support for the child's expenses, how the parents will resolve 24 major changes or disagreements affecting the child including changes that arise due to the 25 child's age and developmental needs, and any other issues the court may require.

Arizona courts have interpreted joint legal decision - making and equal 50 - 50 parenting time as their default orders based on recent law and precedent.

As equal parenting time and joint legal decision making are almost a given (aside from certain specific activities that rebut the presumption), parents can work from that place in order to personalize and custom tailor their specific agreements to fit their schedules, and their children's needs.

Even after explosive divorce litigation in Arizona, judge - ordered outcomes of joint legal decision - making and equal parenting time are still most common.

While a number of researchers purport to have found relitigation rates lower following mediated decisions, or (primarily in early studies) in joint custody arrangements, not one of these studies appears to have corrected for (in the first case) the reality that negotiated agreements are not as legally amenable to modification as court orders, or (in both cases) that couples who achieved accord in mediation, as well as those who voluntarily chose early joint custody arrangements were already relatively more amicable couples.

(2) No joint custody order will be entered unless the court designates the parent who will make the decisions that require immediate attention concerning the health, safety, and welfare of the child.

In the inane insistence that «both» parents «participate» in making decisions regarding the child, in order to avoid stalemate, parenting coordination is the tool for unworkable custody and timeshare arrangements, notably joint custody, which removes from BOTH parents the right to function with authority and automony.

This decision contains sage words of wisdom with respect to how to assess credibility of witnesses, how we should approach the «best interests of the child» test, what is the real significance of «primary care parent», what sort of evidence one should present to the court re «best interests», the effect of domestic violence allegations, abuse allegations, what does «shared parenting» mean, what does «joint custody» mean and when should it be ordered, and the importance of past conflict.