Sentences with phrase «order made by a court saying»

This is a temporary order made by a court saying that the child should be monitored by Children's Services wherever they are living, until a permanent order is made, but it does not give Children's Services parental responsibility.

Not exact matches

Although Palmer has abided by a court - ordered support payment schedule — making monthly payments of $ 1,250 — a lawyer familiar with the case says that Palmer has never seen or attempted to contact his daughter.

Meanwhile Kashamu in his reply to the query denied some of the allegations against him, saying «The issuance of the query is contemptuous of the order of the court made on the 5th of September 2017 by the Federal High Court, Abuja.&rcourt made on the 5th of September 2017 by the Federal High Court, Abuja.&rCourt, Abuja.»

In his writ filed on Friday, Mr Amidu, popularly known as Citizen Vigilante, said: «I oppose the application for stay of proceeding on the main ground that it discloses no reasonable ground or grounds for the making of an application for stay of proceedings to this Court pending the discharge or reversal of the ruling order of this Court dated 16th November 2016 aforesaid to warrant its consideration by this Court.»

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered an interim forfeiture of the sums of N500m and $ 500,000 said to have been looted from the Paris Club refunds made by the Federal Government in favour of the 36 states of the federation.

However, in Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)(1983) 4 FLR 102, CA Ormrod LJ said that while applications to set aside could be made by either a new action or an appeal to a higher court, there was much convenience in an application to the judge who made the original order who could determine the application and then make a new order if appropriate.

The complaint says that Bluford pretended to be an attorney, manufactured «official» court and government documents, including court orders signed by a made - up judge, and fabricated legal claims and court hearings, extracting more and more money from the plaintiffs at every step along the way.

If the English Court made an order for transfer of a Scottish property (say, from both spouses to one of them) then if one of the spouses fails to comply with the order by refusing the sign the transfer documents, there seems to be no easy way to make that happen.

[15] On the other hand, the plaintiff says this is not a case where Rule 7 - 6 (1) is applicable because the court did not make an order under this subrule for the plaintiff to attend to be examined by Dr. Coen.

We say this because the division of powers part of the judgement (commencing at para 98) is full of all sorts of references to two levels of government (see e.g. para 141) and similar comments about «interlocking federal and provincial schemes» that make it abundantly clear that this Court has given no thought to the space within which indigenous laws may operate within the modern constitutional order (for recognition that the law making authority of aboriginal peoples pre-dated the Crown's acquisition of sovereignty, was not extinguished by that acquisition of sovereignty and was not impaired by the division of legislative powers between the federal and provincial governments in 1982 see Campbell v British Columbia (2000), 189 DLR (4th) 333 (BCSC) and Justice Deschamps in Beckman v Little Salmon / Carmacks First Nation, [2010] 3 SCR 103 at para 97).

[42] I told Mr. Elkin that the question I had raised concerned compliance or lack of compliance with the order made by Stinson J. I told him that the Supreme Court of Canada has said that the civil justice system in Canada is broken and that more intensive Trial Management is one of the mechanisms being implemented to try to repair the system.

Section 31F (6) says that «any order» made by the family court can be varied, rescinded, suspended or revived.

Playing uncivil, tactical, inappropriate, old - school, trial by ambush games like: threatening to require proof of obviously valid records, holding back important documents until the last second, failing to fulfil undertakings until the eve of trial, delivering new expert's reports during the trial, saying untrue things to counsel opposite (whether knowingly or not), failing to prepare examinations in advance to «wing it» at trial, refusing to agree to the admissibility of relevant documents while requiring changes to be made to irrelevant ones, refusing to share costs of joint expenses, refusing to cooperate on court ordered process matters, are all wrongful.

However, as the non-disclosure alleged by the wife in this case is said to be intentional, then, if there was such non-disclosure, the 2004 order should be set aside, unless the husband could satisfy the court that the 2004 order would have been agreed and made in any event (see per Lady Hale in Sharland).

Second, the judge said, an error was made by the Court of Appeal when ordering that the English Commercial Court should decide the fraud issue as involving an adjournment of the decision on that issue within the terms of s103.

Speech by Sir James Munby (president of the family courts) to the Society of editors: - «I have said this many times in the past but it must never be forgotten that, with the state's abandonment of the right to impose capital sentences, orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.

(a) that the Claimants contracted with the Defendants to purchase package holidays at the Club Aguamar Hotel and stayed at the Club Aguamar Hotel between the dates set out in the schedule to the order, and (b) that the Claimants suffered gastric or other illness of various durations, and / or personal injury, and / or distress, inconvenience, loss and damage as a result of improper performance of the provision of services under the holiday contract, in respect of which the Claimants hold the Defendant liable (i) under the Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992, and / or (ii) by reason of breaches of the said contracts of various dates for the provision of holidays, made in writing, and within the jurisdiction of this Court, and / or (iii) by reason of the Defendant's negligence during the said period, and / or (iv) by reason of the Defendant's misrepresentations made on various dates and inducung the Claimants to enter the said contracts for the provision of holidays.

court order: A legal decision made by a court that says something is to be done or not done.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the foregoing enabling act and to the matters recited in the foregoing preface, that the annexed rules be and the same hereby are adopted for the regulation of original and appellate civil practice and procedure in judicial proceedings in the district courts of the State of Nevada, and the forms annexed thereto approved; that the same shall be effective on January 1, 1953; that publication thereof be made by the mailing of a printed copy by the clerk of this court to each member of the State Bar of Nevada according to the clerk's official list of membership of such Bar (which will include all district judges and district attorneys), and that the certificate of the clerk of this court as to such mailing, not less than sixty days prior to January 1, 1953, shall be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of said rules in accordance with the provisions of said enabling act.

This appeal considered whether, when a confiscation order is made under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994, the words «the said sum... as was due at the time of the period of detention was imposed» in s 79 (2) of the 1980 Act mean the sum due when the default term was fixed by the Crown Court judge or the sum due when the default term was activated by the Magistrates» Court.

In its order, the court of Additional District Judge Kiran Bansal said, «In India, the courts have recognised that the contribution made by the wife to the house is invaluable and can not be computed in terms of money.

Joint legal custody is usually ordered by the court to give parents equal say regarding important decisions made on behalf of the children.

«Support payments that a person is required to make, whether it's pursuant to a court order or a separation agreement, are treated by many lenders the same way as debt payments when the lender is reviewing an application for financing,» she says.

If his payments are made by automatic income withholding from his wages, the withholding will continue until a court order says otherwise.

An interim care order (ICO) is a temporary order made by the court which says that the child should be looked after in the care system for a temporary period.

I've been called a liar by social services, the police and cafcass who have all taken it upon themselves to call me this and say I've made up malicious allegations in order to keep my sons cusotdy, which destroyed the court case.