Sentences with phrase «order of a court concerning»

A regulation or order of a court concerning the manner in which its business shall be conducted.

Not exact matches

As the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed, a law aimed at suppressing or reducing an «evil» or addressing a public concern relating to peace, order, security, morality, health, or some other similar purpose is a valid exercise of the federal government's criminal law power.

She also said the company has suspended a pre-feasibility study of Pascua - Lama, an open pit gold, silver and copper mine in Chile, which regulators ordered permanently closed last year following court battles about environmental concerns.

Stevens offered not a word of concern about whether religious students might feel themselves to be less than full members of the political community if, by order of the nation's highest court, their messages and only their messages are categorically excluded from the school's public arena.

The court also heard that the child, who was taken from her mother after police became concerned for her welfare, could still be taken to her grandmother's country of origin if a permanent order was made to grant her care of the girl.

Until it's out of the courts nobody knows what the order actually is so far as the law is concerned.

The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday said it would voluntarily dismiss its own appeal of a Seattle federal court ruling that had suspended President Donald Trump's first executive order concerning travel from seven Muslim - majority countries.

Abonta expressed concern that, it would spell doom for Nigerian democracy and it would also give room to anarchy, if «an agency of the Federal Government (police) continues to disobey orders of the court.»

The concerned lawyer with the support of other members of the judicial arm of the government, including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), asserted that Buhari, by his statements during the Presidential Media Chat at the State House in Abuja, was behind the flagrant disobedience to court orders.

Through the petition, Ajie made what she described as a clarion call on President Obama and other concerned stakeholders to «respectfully call President Buhari to order, prohibit violence from politics and rights advocacy campaigns, ask President Buhari to respect court orders or resign, support Nigeria and Nigerians to achieve true federalism or support the path to a confederation of independent states in Nigeria.»

However, on 10th July, the Commission received an order given by the Federal High Court, Abuja and dated 6th July, 2017, directing the «parties to maintain the status quo till the determination of the Plaintiff's motion on notice, in respect of the suit filed by the concerned senator, seeking orders of injunction against the Commission to stop it from acting on the petition by the Kogi West Senatorial District Registered Voters.

But on the same 10th July, the Commission received an order given by the Federal High Court, Abuja and dated 6th July, directing the «parties to maintain the status quo till the determination of the plaintiff's motion on notice» in respect of the suit filed by the concerned senator, seeking orders of injunction against the Commission to stop it from acting on the petition by the registered voters of Kogi West Senatorial District.

Among the allegations Mr. Amidu has put out concerning the judgement debt saga, as he filed a successful application at the Supreme Court to examine Mr. Woyome following the AG, Marietta Brew Appiah - Oppong's, discontinuation of the case, he said the AG withdrew her application to examine Mr. Woyome because President Mahama personally gave an order.

All these real strong evidences of harm, I think, for us, gave us such concern that we could not wait for this case to be resolved after a number of years, and so we moved for an expedited order, so we requested that the court order that this jail stop placing juveniles in solitary.

«The Court of Appeals finding properly acknowledges that the school district's responsibility under the IDEA is not to cure or remediate all effects of a child's disability, but to serve students with a demonstrated «need» for special education and related services in order to benefit from his or her education,» said NSBA Associate Executive Director and General Counsel Francisco M. Negrón, Jr. «Given that the student in this case is academically successful, it may be more appropriate to address non-educational concerns through other accommodations.»

Folks, this is very big... In the latest turn of events in LG vs Sony legal fight concerning various patents infringement, The civil court of justice from Hague sided with LG and ordered a preliminary injunction against Sony.

One week ago today the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) accepted a consent order from the Government of Belize and Maya leaders representing 38 Maya villages in the Toledo District which settled a large part of the case brought by the latter concerning the granting of communal...

- Camelot wanted players to «raise» their amiibo in the game - Camelot also wanted some RPG elements to amiibo play, as well as amiibo having a connection to online play - devs didn't want the GamePad to draw the player's attention away from the TV, so they used it for a reverse court view - Nintendo helped bring this feature together - a demo was made in about 3 - 4 months in order to get some feedback - this was Camelot's first HD title - the giant characters (with the Mega Battles) were implemented as some sort of test for HD - the devs wanted the game to be as accessible as possible - that's why Giant Goombas, Jump Shots and Chance Shots can be disabled - Nintendo suggested additions such as the Jump Shots - Mega Battles were Camelot's idea, not Nintendo's - the developers were concerned about how they would work, and what impact they would have on basic actions

Should the referring court find that, according to the particular values of the legal order of the Member State in which it has jurisdiction, offences such as those committed by Mr I. pose a direct threat to the calm and physical security of the population, that should not necessarily lead to the expulsion of the person concerned.

Canada Supreme Court decision on cross-border beer run could rewrite trade rules, Globe and Mail Feds order budget review of Gordie Howe bridge over cost concerns, documents show, Toronto Star Ex-wife wins one of largest alimony judgments in Quebec history, Ottawa Citizen

The Court of Appeal expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence of any provision addressing the course of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other court process to attend a courthouse or regiCourt of Appeal expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence of any provision addressing the course of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other court process to attend a courthouse or regicourt process to attend a courthouse or registry.

That's In the Matter of Section 53 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, C. S - 26 and in the Matter of a Reference by the Governor General in Council concerning the proposed Canadian Securities Act, as set out in Order in Council P.C. 2010 - 667, dated May 26, 2010 (33718)

In a brief but highly unusual order issued this morning, the Supreme Court reversed course and agreed to hear the Guantanamo detainee case, concerning the constitutionality of the administration's policy of detaining so - called enemy combatants without allowing them to challenge the legality of detention through use of a writ of habeaus corpus.

The Court of Appeal largely accepted a revised form of order drafted by the Respondent to address these concerns, adding that a clause must be included permitting the Appellant to appear at any court in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office fCourt of Appeal largely accepted a revised form of order drafted by the Respondent to address these concerns, adding that a clause must be included permitting the Appellant to appear at any court in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office fcourt in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office first.

(2) «Sole custody» means a person, including, but not limited to, a parent who has temporary or permanent custody of a child and, unless otherwise provided for by court order, the rights and responsibilities for major decisions concerning the child, including the child's education, medical and dental care, extracurricular activities, and religious training.

With regard to procedures concerning a Protection Order, the party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply to the opposite party until the date for oral proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite pOrder, the party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply to the opposite party until the date for oral proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite porder is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite porder has been sent to the opposite party.

Article 19 With regard to procedures concerning a Protection Order, the party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply to the opposite party until the date for oral proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite pOrder, the party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply to the opposite party until the date for oral proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite porder is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite porder has been sent to the opposite party.

In addition to the matters provided for by this Act, any necessary matters with regard to the procedures concerning a Protection Order shall be provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

Mr. Justice Willcock noted that, although this was a borderline case and a remedial costs order was appropriate to emphasise «the Court's concern with respect to the conduct of the Plaintiff» outright dismissal of the claim was too harsh a result in the circumstances.

Casual Facebook or other messaging commenting adversely on one's employer or business activities, even gossiping about the boss and work peers, can all now be the subject of concern to the employer and indeed mandated by court order to be produced.

Concerning the perspective of comparative constitutional law you suggest in your title, I would like to know if you have registered another case in Europe (or outside Europe) where a Constitutional Court orders the suspension of a meeting to be held by a regional parliament: this is what happened last October 5th, when the Tribunal Constitucional of Spain adopted its decision, ordering the suspension of a meeting of the Parliament in Catalonia, scheduled for October 9 (see full text of this decision at: http://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/docs/BOE/BOE-A-2017-11409.pdf).

It is quite unprecedented in the arena of family law matters concerning children for Japanese courts to issue orders that can be enforced against an unwilling defendant.

Article 22 In addition to the matters provided for by this Act, any necessary matters with regard to the procedures concerning a Protection Order shall be provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

We will help to inform the court of the circumstances concerning your child support matter, and pursue a fair and appropriate order or modification.

Prior to joining the Firm, Janelle served as a judicial law clerk for Honorable Judge William Hughes, Hamilton County Superior Court in Indiana where she performed legal research in the preparation of memoranda, opinions, or orders for Judge Hughes concerning various cases before him.

Bill of Costs Bill of Costs (Tariff Items) Consent Form 18 Requisition — General Form 41 Subpoena Form 52.2 Certificate Concerning Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses Form 80A Affidavit Form 91 Direction to Attend Form 124A Notice of change of solicitor Form 146A1 Affidavit of service Form 146A2 Affidavit of service — Personal Service Form 146B Solicitor's Certificate of Service Form 149 Tender of Payment into Court Form 171A Statement of claim Form 171B Statement of defence Form 171C Reply Form 171D Counterclaim against parties to main action only Form 171E Counterclaim against plaintiff and person not already party to the main action Form 171F Defence to Counterclaim Form 171G Reply to defence to counterclaim Form 171H Third Party Claim against a person already party to the action Form 171I Third Party Claim against a person not already party to the action Form 171J Third Party Defence Form 171K Reply to Third Party Defence From 223 Affidavit of Documents Form 255 Request to Admit Form 256 Response to Request to Admit Form 258 Request for Pre-Trail Conference Form 301 Notice of Application Form 305 Notice of Appearance — Application Form 314 Requisition for Hearing — Application Form 337 Notice of Appeal Form 341A Notice of Appearance — Appeal Form 344 Certificate of Completeness of Appeal Book Form 347 Requisition for Hearing — Appeal Form 359 Notice of Motion Memorandum of Fact and Law Model Bifurcation Order Model Jeopardy Order Motion Record Notice of Consent to Electronic Service Solicitor's Certificate of Expert Witness

If you have any concerns involving the enforcement of a court order, do not hesitate to contact us online or call us at 850-316-8243 or 866-331-5998 toll free.

The CJC says there is growing concern about the way such injunctions are being sought and / or used; the powers afforded to the courts (principally the county court, although the youth court can grant civil injunctions against juveniles); the limited powers available to the county court on breach; whether third parties should be involved in the process, and whether breaches of these orders are then a shortcut to mandatory possession orders.

[42] I told Mr. Elkin that the question I had raised concerned compliance or lack of compliance with the order made by Stinson J. I told him that the Supreme Court of Canada has said that the civil justice system in Canada is broken and that more intensive Trial Management is one of the mechanisms being implemented to try to repair the system.

It may be by some other form of investigation or examination into his private concerns, as by opening his private and personal mail, searching his safe or his wallet, examining his private bank account, or compelling him by a forged court order to permit an inspection of his personal documents.

The decision in Vinod Chopra Films Private Limited et al. v. John Doe 2010 FC 387 by Hughes, J. concerns a review of a «rolling» Anton Piller order granted by the Federal Court of Canada in a copyright infringement case to an Indian film production company and its Canadian licensee against various un-named persons who (according to the claim) «deal in counterfeit video recordings.»

As noted by the Ontario Court of Appeal in M.E.H. v. Williams (2012 ONCA 35), purely personal interests can not justify non-publication or sealing orders: ``... the personal concerns of a litigant, including concerns about the very real emotional distress and embarrassment that can be occasioned to litigants when justice is done in public, will not, standing alone, satisfy the necessity branch of the test».

In this case, the only possibility for the Commission to follow through with the request, is to argue that it needs the Opinion of the Court in order to take away the concerns of the European Parliament and submitting it to the Parliament again or by renegotiating the agreement on the basis of the Opinion and the demands of the European Parliament.

The Supreme Court of Canada will hear four appeals this week, including an aboriginal law case concerning the duty of consult, two criminal cases and the B.C. Crown's appeal of a decision ordering it to turn over data to a major tobacco company in response to the province's bid to recover health - care costs.

The monopoly of dispute settlement maintained by the EU courts under Art. 344 TFEU obliges the Member States to settle disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Treaties by no other means than the ones provided for in the latter and thereby strengthens the jurisdictional order of competences within the EU.

I am especially concerned that most of the issues which Justice Beatty would instruct the family court to consider — housing, food, clothing, and medical care — are subject to unconscious bias based upon Mother's poverty as is demonstrated by the TPR order here.

When adopting this rule, the Court recognized, «Cases involving child victims present special concerns that weigh in favor of allowing judicial discretion to order psychological evaluations.»

Amongst other things, the court was told that workers had not been provided with health and safety training; fall protection equipment was not provided by the company; the injured worker was wearing dress shoes not safety footwear; the modified platform on the order picker was on an angle and did not have any features to prevent slipping; further safety concerns involving the use of order pickers were observed by the Ministry of Labour following the accident; the MOL was told that the father of a third director would direct workers to work without safety precautions; and there was evidence that an unknown person had attached a safety lanyard to the involved order picker before the Ministry of Labour arrived to investigate the accident.

Specifically, if the intrusion on the person's privacy and body would be so disproportionate to society's interest in the proper administration of justice, to the extent that any concerns can not be ameliorated by variations of the order, the court is not required to make a DNA order.

In case the obligation is not performed, upon application of a party, the Family Court may issue a performance order if the obligation is concerning property rights.