Eight Leicester City fans were found guilty of public
order offences following disturbances before last season's Champions League quarterfinal first leg defeat at Atletico's former Vicente Calderon home.
Not exact matches
The speech read by the Acting GOC at the inauguration of the court martial reads, «
Following the directive from Army Headquarters (AHQ) that a standing General Court Martial (GCM) be set up for Op Lafiya Dole to try
offences committed by personnel within the Theatre of Operation, I issued a Convening
Order for a GCM on 5 August 2016 and the members were directed to assemble today at this venue for the formal inauguration of the GCM.
The governor, who insisted that due process of the law must be
followed in fighting corruption, noted that disobedience to court
orders itself is a criminal
offence that is more grievous than corruption.
The other projects selected are: conservation covenants; electoral law, talking account of technological advances; electronic communications code; European contract law; family financial
orders following divorce and enforcing financial arrangements for children;
offences against the person; rights to light in connection with planning law and land development; the regulation of taxis and private hire vehicles; trademark and design litigation; and the law of wildlife management.
«The
offences cognizable by military commissions may thus be classed as
follows: (1) Crimes and statutory
offences cognizable by State or U.S. courts, and which would properly be tried by such courts if open and acting; (2) Violations of the laws and usages of war cognizable by military tribunals only; (3) Breaches of military
orders or regulations for which offenders are not legally triable by court - martial under the Articles of War.»
They end up pleading guilty to
offences like
following too closely or failing to turn in safety, not realizing that, effectively, they may have been «played» by a system that appears to encourage or at least condone overcharging in
order to exact a guilty plea to a lesser
offence.
The Canadian Human Rights Act defines the
following prohibited grounds of discrimination: race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an
offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been
ordered.
These rules amend the Family Proceedings Rules 1991
following the amendment of the Family Law Act 1996 by the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 to provide that breach of a non-molestation
order is a criminal
offence and to limit the power of the court to attach a power of arrest to an occupation
order only.
Unlike the new criminal
offences, the new civil provision is not subject to criminal fines or imprisonment, but gives the Competition Tribunal the power to make remedial
orders following successful applications by the bureau.