Not exact matches
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc., Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., Ubisoft Inc., and Nintendo of America Inc.'s (collectively «Defendants»)
on Plaintiff Richard J. Baker's («Baker») claims
for infringement pursuant to the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS» MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 20
for infringement pursuant to the Court's
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS»
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 20
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed
on January 4, 2017.
Plaintiffs and defendant all filed
motions for summary judgment, and
on Feb. 2, U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan issued a memorandum ruling in favor of plaintiffs and an
order permanently barring Public.Resource.Org from posting any of the plaintiffs» standards.
The mother filed a
motion for summary judgment seeking an
order that, among other things, the father pay child support based
on the Child Support Guidelines, an
order that the father pay his share of the child's section 7 expenses, and that the father settle unpaid child support (i.e. arrears).
Interns will have the opportunity to draft bench memoranda, judicial
orders, and opinions
on a variety of substantive matters, including
motions to dismiss,
motions for summary judgment, magistrate judge reports, and habeas corpus petitions.
In my view, absent limited circumstances (such as a trial
on damages once liability is determined), the Court should restrict itself from
ordering a mini-trial when a party has chosen to tender a deficient evidentiary record
on a
motion for summary judgment,
for a mini-trial ought not to permit a party to buttress or «cooper up» its deficient record.
Opposed a
motion for summary judgment brought by CIBC against a mortgator where CIBC alleged default under the terms of the mortgage flowing from the registration of a restraint
order on title pursuant to the provisions of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
However, while writing his reasons, the
motion judge decided to resolve the
motions on a fifth basis: he would grant a notional cross-
motion by the respondents
for partial
summary judgment of their claim
for breach of fiduciary duty and
order a trial or additional
summary judgment motions to prove victimization, harm and causation of harm, and to quantify the individual respondents» damages, if any.
The
motions judge dismissed the claim against one of the defendants
on a
motion for summary judgment, and subsequently
ordered a focussed, hybrid trial to deal with the balance of the claims.
The Trademark Office in this case stated that in
order to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to its intent to use
on a
motion for summary judgment, an applicant must rely
on specific facts that establish the «existence of an ability and willingness to use the mark in the United States to identify [the goods in the application] at the time of the filing of the application.»
In the recent costs ruling
on Columbos v. Columbos, 1 the self - represented litigants who were
on the receiving end of a
motion for summary judgment were
ordered to pay the applicant's and moving party's costs.
Praedia Realty Corp. v. Durst (233 A.D. 2d 380)-
order granting buyer's
motion for summary judgment dismissing broker's complaint affirmed; broker was hired by seller to find a purchaser
for the premises; contract between broker and buyer will not be implied in fact where facts are inconsistent with its existence;
order granting selling broker's
motion for summary judgment dismissing broker's complaint affirmed; in the absence of an agreement with the buyer, conduct
on the part of selling broker can not be the proximate cause of seller's broker's failure to collect a commission from buyer; broker not entitled to commission where at time broker negotiated selling price, buyer was not ready, willing and able to purchase at the terms set by the seller.