Sentences with phrase «ordered appellant»

The appellant was convicted in his absence in Albania, a category 2 territory, and the secretary of state for the Home Department ordered the appellant's extradition.

The secretary of state subsequently ordered the appellant's extradition, and he appealed.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal also found that a «beneficiary need not suffer an actual loss in order to be entitled to a remedy» (at paragraph 23) and «given the shameful conduct on the part of the appellant fiduciary» (at paragraph 26) it ordered the appellant to pay the funds to the court pending the final outcome of the administration of the estate, while repeatedly emphasizing the obligations of a committee and the lengths the court will go to in upholding this fiduciary relationship.

The district court thus ordered appellant to pay respondent $ 109,505 in past - due maintenance.»

The Respondent claimed the trial judge erred by failing to allot 50 % of the trial to the Indian asset issues; by relying on an affidavit of an employee of the Appellant's counsel in finding that the Appellant had made proper disclosure, without allowing the Respondent an opportunity to contradict it; by failing to order the Appellant to pay child and spousal support; and by failing to properly allot the time taken up by each party on the issues raised at trial and their respective success on those issues.

The appellant's counsel also challenged the ability of the trial judge to order the appellant to pay the estate back for the expenses, arguing the residuary beneficiaries should have to sue the appellant, as the estate could be unjustly enriched by the expenditures.

The JOLs succeeded on their s. 145 claim at first instance, with Clifford J ordering the Appellant to repay over US$ 8 million in redemption proceeds to the liquidation estate.

(1) Did the motion judge err by ordering the appellant to post security for costs of the appeal in the amount of $ 20,000?

To the extent that he did so, the application judge was without jurisdiction to order the appellant to return to England with her children.

Not exact matches

«[A] ssuming that the allegations are true, Appellant not only personally suffered harm, but public safety and order were harmed as well,» she wrote.

'' For me, I strongly hold the view that there is no dispute on the relevant / essential facts grating the claims of the appellants which relate to the determination of the action of the 1st respondent in setting up a caretaker committee of the PDP, Anambra State chapter during the pendency of the judgment / order of the Federal High Court, recognizing the appellants as the persons duly elected to that position.

He ordered Jacobs to file his respondents» brief in response to Saraki's appellant's brief served on him in court on Thursday within seven days.

According to court documents, Silva alleges that her job «entailed concocting phony profiles of alluring females and inputting these profiles into the appellants» online dating service in order to attract male subscribers.»

He also concluded that the Appellant was a vexatious litigant, and made an order requiring that the Appellant obtain leave before filing any legal proceeding or legal document.

BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2009, the Respondent Attorney General of British Columbia filed a statement of claim seeking an interlocutory and permanent injunction, as well as a vexatious litigant order under s. 18 of the Supreme Court Act, in relation to the Appellant, Michael Andrews.

On June 4, 2015, the Respondent applied for a permanent injunction order and a declaration that the Appellant was a vexatious litigant.

Revisions were made to address the appellant's access to the courts and his contact with the AG — the revised, proposed order was provided to the division in advance of judgment.

The appellant had sought various court orders by filing unintelligible documents.

Charter of Rights: The appellant was convicted of operating a vehicle contrary to a prohibition order.

The Court also specified that the order must provide supervising counsel with the ability to authorize the Appellant to direct correspondence to a lawyer in the Civil Litigation branch other than the one named in the order.

The Court of Appeal expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence of any provision addressing the course of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other court process to attend a courthouse or registry.

The Appellant brought an action in the BC Supreme Court seeking a declaration that the Respondent was using its official mark without authorization, and seeking several orders including one requiring transfer of the domain names to it.

The Court of Appeal largely accepted a revised form of order drafted by the Respondent to address these concerns, adding that a clause must be included permitting the Appellant to appear at any court in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office first.

The facts of Austin could therefore be distinguished from those in R (Gillan) v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12, [2006] 2 AC 307, where the interference with the appellant's freedom of movement in order to effect a stop and search pursuant to s 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 had been «merely transitory».

8 Aug. 22, 2106)(unpublished), appellant challenged a fee order on the ground that the attorney relied on summaries rather than detailed billing records.

Within 14 days after notice of appeal is filed, except that in bail appeals and juvenile abuse and neglect cases, appellant orders transcripts at the same time notice of appeal is filed

First, the Court found that the application judge had the requisite jurisdiction to make the order and declaration the appellant was required to transfer full ownership to the respondent.

In the arbitral award, the tribunal had found the appellant in breach of EU competition law and ordered it to pay damages.

Indigenous appellants Manasie Ipeelee and Frank Ralph Ladue had breached long - term supervision orders (LTSO), and their case consequently centered on the determination of a just sentence for their crimes.

The appellant has 14 days to order those transcripts.

Summary: The appellant foreign state challenged the lower court's judgment that real property owned by the appellant could be used to execute an enforcement order of an arbitral award.

If the appellant has not ordered transcripts of hearings that you think are necessary, you must file and serve on the appellant a list of the additional hearings that need to be included.

Summary: The appellant requested the Supreme Court of Sweden to lift the confiscation of documents ordered by the Svea Court of Appeal under the Swedish Act on International Legal Assistance in...

the application judge erred by exceeding his jurisdiction by ordering and making a declaration that the appellant must transfer ownership to the respondent; and

Summary: The appellant requested a court order under the 1929 Swedish Arbitration Act (the «1929 Act») while the arbitration proceeding was ongoing, seeking compensation for paying the...

[4] The application judge rejected the appellants» application to quash the production order.

As a result, the respondent joins the appellant in requesting that the conviction be set aside and a new trial ordered.»

«Instead of carefully reviewing the evidence in the case in order to determine whether or not the Crown had, in fact, established that the appellant possessed the specific intent of wilfulness required by s. 173 (1) of the Criminal Code, the trial judge erroneously convicted the appellant based upon a perceived (but non-existent) legal presumption that the necessary wilfulness was established by the fact that his acts of masturbation were in fact witnessed by another,» he wrote.

The appellant's repeated failure to comply, coupled with the other instances of non co-operation, by failure to comply with bail conditions and community sentences, are clearly, as the judge found, part of a deliberate policy of disobedience to court orders.

She recognized that there could be a concern about whether the appellants maximized their involvement in order to satisfy Mr. Big's concerns that the information from the expert reports be explained to his satisfaction.

In order to answer this question, a lawyer should start with a baseline (how often does any appellant win an appeal) and adjust based on the particular circumstances of each case.

The appellant contends the judge erred in law by adopting a flawed approach in her assessment of the evidence of Ms. Iverson and Mr. Easdon, in order to determine whether the presumption of undue influence was rebutted.

The appellant sought leave to appeal this portion of the cost order.

In allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of the motions judge, a unanimous Court of Appeal panel accepted the appellant's argument that Rule 15.02 (4), a rule designed to terminate proceedings where a named plaintiff has not authorized commencement, had no application.

Further, the fact that an appellant may have consented to the admission of the records is not always the determinative factor in deciding whether documents should have been entered into evidence, and will not preclude the ordering of a new trial with costs to the appellant after prejudicial clinical records were entered into evidence: Owimar v. Greater Vancouver Transit Authority, 2007 BCCA 630, citing Samuel.

In order to decide that issue the adjudicator was bound to assess the evidence given by both the appellant and the respondent who sought to attack or justify the account (s), respectively.

The appellant asserts that the Government's actions were targeted to stop Trillium's offshore wind project before Trillium's financing was in place in order to deprive Trillium of the resources to contest the Government's decision to cancel the wind projects in Ontario.»

[1] This appeal is from the judgment of Justice Edward P. Belobaba dismissing the appellant's application for an order that the respondents disclose the identities of confidential sources for a story written by the respondent Sinclair Stewart and published by the respondent the Globe and Mail Inc..

The proceedings arose out of a possession order obtained against the second appellant and an anti-social behaviour injunction against both appellants, in December 2004, which they appealed.

By the time the appeal against the possession order, which also involved the anti-social behaviour order, both appellants were represented by SWL.