Sentences with phrase «ordered joint custody arrangement»

While these side benefits should never be the primary reason to choose joint physical custody, they're worth considering if you're having trouble looking on the bright... MORE side of a court - ordered joint custody arrangement.

In a custody dispute, it is very likely that a court will order a joint custody arrangement.

In a custody dispute, it is very likely that a court will order a joint custody arrangement.

If one parent rents a two - bedroom apartment with a roommate, it's not likely a New Jersey judge will order a joint custody arrangement.

Not exact matches

Being away from your kids in order to comply with a joint custody arrangement allows you to see the bigger picture, that your kids are indeed thriving and that the time they're spending with your ex is good for them.

A Joint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangeJoint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangejoint custody arrangement.

If parents agree to joint custody and ask for it, the arrangement will almost certainly be granted, but if the judge finds that this isn't in the best interests of the child for some reason, he can decline the request and order a different custody arrangement.

A South Dakota court may order or ask the parents to agree on how the following issues will be handled in a joint custody arrangement: where the child will reside and when, where he will attend school, his medical and dental care, and other responsibilities serving his best interests.

If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.

Traditionally, when a joint custody arrangement is ordered, children are the ones who get shuffled back and forth between their parents» homes.

Many parents will share the custodial rights in a joint custody arrangement, or by an order giving the access parent extra rights.

Such interim orders contained provisions stating that the plaintiff and the defendant shall have interim joint custody and guardianship, that the primary address of the children shall be the defendant's address, that for the purpose of access arrangements the plaintiff shall promptly inform the defendant of her monthly work schedule, and the defendant shall make efforts to ensure the children spend equal time with both the plaintiff and the defendant and, upon receipt of such work schedule, draw a calendar setting out parenting time for each parent for the coming month, and that the plaintiff shall be allowed to travel to Japan with the children from November 2, 2002 through November 18, 2002.

While parents who have a shared parenting arrangement will also generally have joint custody, the reverse is not always true: joint custody is often ordered in the absence of shared parenting.

We specialize in the following solutions: ● Child custody agreements ● Child support arrangements ● Visitation rights for fathers ● Joint custody agreements ● Restraining orders to protect fathers

Prior to this action being filed, the parties appear to have been operating under an informal joint custody arrangement without there being a formal custody order.

In T.K. the Court of Appeal recognizes that it is more problematic to extend «respect» to the stated reasons for a move in cases where there has been no previous determination with respect to custody, or where there is a pre-existing joint custody order or de facto joint custody / shared residency arrangement.

Your argument should focus on what has changed in either your or the other parent's life since the time of the original order that makes having a joint custody arrangement in the best interest of the child.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

If no compromise is reached, the parties will have to go before a court and present evidence and testimony as to why it is in the best interest of the child that a joint custody arrangement be ordered.

If the request for modification is due to the other parent's failure to follow the custody order in a joint custody arrangement, the waiting period is six months.

Absent a joint custody agreement by the parents that includes an unequal physical custody arrangement, a judge is now required to order joint custody with an equal amount of parenting time, regardless of where the parent lives, unless one parent is ruled to be unfit.

If parents request joint custody, Michigan judges are obligated to order it, unless some circumstance exists that would make such an arrangement harmful to the child.

While California, unlike some other states, has no preference for joint custody, in order to obtain sole custody, you still must show the arrangement is in the child's best interest.

The court may order sole legal custody with shared physical custody, joint legal custody with sole physical custody or make other custody arrangements.

Parents also reported higher satisfaction with joint custody arrangements, and parents who were ordered to pay child support were more likely to do so when they shared custody of their children.

In such situations, the father generally must prove his parental rights if the mother contests them, in order to be entitled to a joint custody arrangement.

Dr. Holstein estimates that shared / joint physical custody arrangements make up less than 20 % of all custody orders.

Once a court issues an order for joint legal and physical custody, both parents must make legal custody decisions together and adhere to the physical custody arrangements.

Because 95 % of all joint custody awards are for joint legal custody 6 the living arrangements are exactly the same as under a sole - custody / visitation order.

If a joint custody agreement is not reached, a Connecticut judge may order a sole custody arrangement.

A South Dakota court may order or ask the parents to agree on how the following issues will be handled in a joint custody arrangement: where the child will reside and when, where he will attend school, his medical and dental care, and other responsibilities serving his best interests.

Although Connecticut courts generally prefer joint legal custody arrangements, a court will order sole legal custody if it is deemed to be in the child's best interests.

If a Connecticut family court does not order joint custody, it may order alternative custody arrangements, such as awarding sole physical custody to one parent with appropriate visitation for the child with the non-custodial parent.

A Joint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangeJoint Parenting Agreement will also have a mediation clause, which orders parents to mediate all disputes with regards to the joint custody arrangejoint custody arrangement.

If parents agree to joint custody and ask for it, the arrangement will almost certainly be granted, but if the judge finds that this isn't in the best interests of the child for some reason, he can decline the request and order a different custody arrangement.

If joint legal or physical custody is not a good fit for a family, a judge will order a different type of arrangement.

Some states require that both parents have a minimum amount of time with the child in order for the arrangement to be labeled joint custody.

While a number of researchers purport to have found relitigation rates lower following mediated decisions, or (primarily in early studies) in joint custody arrangements, not one of these studies appears to have corrected for (in the first case) the reality that negotiated agreements are not as legally amenable to modification as court orders, or (in both cases) that couples who achieved accord in mediation, as well as those who voluntarily chose early joint custody arrangements were already relatively more amicable couples.

If you can't satisfy New Jersey's criteria for joint custody, this doesn't rule out shared custody, and New Jersey judges are much more willing to order this type of arrangement.

The tax consequence of a joint physical custody arrangement is yet another piece of the financial framework that should be addressed if joint custody is to be ordered.

In contemplating a proposed joint custody order, the best interests of the child standard obliges the court to ensure that the parents have assessed all components of their joint agreement, * 803 that they are committed to making it work, that their proposal fully addresses the many contingencies, and that there is no reason to believe that the child's interests will not be served by the arrangement.

Before a New Jersey court will order joint custody, the judge must find that a variety of factors are conducive to the arrangement.

In the inane insistence that «both» parents «participate» in making decisions regarding the child, in order to avoid stalemate, parenting coordination is the tool for unworkable custody and timeshare arrangements, notably joint custody, which removes from BOTH parents the right to function with authority and automony.

If the court decides that it's appropriate to place certain limitations on a joint custody arrangement, it will spell those out in its custody order.

A family court judge is not likely to order a joint physical custody arrangement when parents live in separate states, and with good reason.

Contemplating and providing for such arrangements as part of a parenting plan or, in the absence of such a plan, at the time that a joint custody order is entered can avoid confusion, hostilities, and reduced financial capacity to meet child rearing obligations later on.

Consequently, many couples enter into joint custody arrangements and judges frequently order joint custody.