Not exact matches
Nnamdi Kanu was granted bail on a lesser charge but was rearrested on two occasions until the government filed higher charges
relating to terrorism and treason and found
courts which rightly on the basis of the more severe charges refused bail; Dasuki's case is more complicated - today there are valid
orders of bail
made by several
courts in his favour, but he has consistently been re-arrested and a charge of leaving the army improperly over two decades ago is now being added to his alleged crimes -LRB-!)
Procedure to
Make a Request To submit a valid
court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim
related information
by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
All of this
relates to decisions the
court made at or before trial, and it's unsurprising that the
court still stands
by its
orders.
Our lawyers recognize the severe impact that may arise if sensitive, confidential information is
made publicly available, and are familiar with the most effective strategies to contain and resolve such matters as quickly as possible — whether through emergency injunctive relief,
by sealing
court records, or
by obtaining protective
orders related to the trade secrets at issue.
• (a) and (b) do not directly
relate to the parent's statement; • (c) a legal practitioner is entitled to advise a client of (i) the provisions and import of s 98 of the 1989 Act and (ii) the ability of the police and / or a co-accused to
make application for disclosure into the criminal proceedings of statements, reports and documents filed in the care proceedings; • (d) it is wholly inappropriate and potentially a contempt of
court, however, for a legal practitioner to advise a client not to comply with an
order made in care proceedings; • (e) it is wholly inappropriate and potentially a contempt of
court for a legal practitioner to advise a client not to give a full, accurate and comprehensive response to the findings of fact sought
by a local authority in the threshold criteria document.
(a) lawful authority refers to lawful authority other than (i) a subpoena or warrant issued, or an
order made,
by a
court, person or body with jurisdiction to compel the production of information, or (ii) rules of
court relating to the production of records; and (b) the organization that discloses the personal information is not required to verify the validity of the lawful authority identified
by the government institution or the part of a government institution.
Can
courts delegate actual judicial decision -
making functions to Parenting Coordinators, in
order to
by - pass the need to repeatedly bring parenting -
related disputes back before the
court?
«Lawful authority» in s. 7 (3)(c. 1)(ii) of PIPEDA must be contrasted with s. 7 (3)(c), which provides that personal information may be disclosed without consent where «required to comply with a subpoena or warrant issued or an
order made by a
court, person or body with jurisdiction to compel the production of information, or to comply with rules of
court relating to the production of records».
87 Where an
order is
made by a judge of the Superior
Court of Justice for the production
by the Chief Electoral Officer of any document in his or her possession
relating to an election, the production of it
by him or her, in such manner as is directed
by the
order, is evidence that the document
relates to the election, and any endorsement appearing on any envelope containing ballots so produced is evidence that the contents are what they are stated to be
by the endorsement.
Therefore, in accordance with the terms of our privacy statement we will not disclose to any third party for any reason either the contents of or any facts
relating to the contents of a user's email or any other communication a user sends to us; provided, however, such disclosure will be
made when required to do so
by law or
by properly issued
court order or when good - faith belief exists that such action is legally necessary to: (1) comply with the law or comply with legal process served on California Legal Research, Inc.; (2) protect and defend the legitimate business interests, rights or property of California Legal Research, Inc., its users, customers, or affiliates; or (3) act in an emergency to protect the personal safety of CALRI.com users or the public.
The questions included: (i) whether or not a non-derogating control
order imposed under PTA 2005 constituted a criminal charge for the purposes of Art 6 of the Convention; and (ii) whether or not the procedures provided for
by PTA 2005, s 3 and the rules of
court were compatible with Art 6 in circumstances where they had resulted in a case
made against a person subject to a control
order being in its essence entirely undisclosed to him and in no specific allegation of terrorism -
related activity being contained in open material.
Procedure to
Make a Request To submit a valid
court order of protection and / or a request to receive communications of claim
related information
by alternative means or at alternative locations to Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection please use the following address:
Part of the gag
order on Open Whisper Systems was lifted after a
court challenge
by the American Civil Liberties Union, and redacted versions of documents
related to the information request were
made public last week.
(9) The amendment
made by item 33 of this Schedule applies to a
court proposing to
make an
order mentioned in subsection 65G (1) of the new Act, whether or not the proceedings to which the
order relates were initiated before commencement.
(c) an undertaking given to, and accepted
by, the
court in proceedings under this Act other than proceedings that
relate wholly or partly to, or to the
making of, a parenting
order; or