As such, and since the God of Islam is the same God of Christianity and Judaism (according to the Quran that just been certified), Christianity and Judaism are true religions of God with text that has been corrupted (another reason you find contradictions with science because
ordinary humans changed the word of God so you can see the flaws in it).
Not exact matches
Called the «Summary for Policymakers,» it delivered to policymakers and
ordinary people alike an unambiguous message: scientists are more confident than ever that
humans have interfered with the climate and that further
human - induced climate
change is on the way.
An out - of - the -
ordinary zombie (named R) feels the need to protect a
human named Julie, and as they develop their relationship
changes occur within R as well as the zombie population causing conflict and fighting between the two groups.
Rather than focussing on the important but inherently incremental developments in the science behind the issue, the media would do us all a favor by maintaining a consistent message regarding the underlying issue (i.e.
human action is causing climate
change, and climate
change has the potential to do great harm to our way of life) and focus on how
ordinary people can take steps in their own lives to help address the problem in ways that don't require inordinate sacrifice.
Data correlating «
ordinary science intelligence» (as measured by a standard nine - question test), political ideology, and tendency to agree with the statement «there is «solid evidence» of recent global warming due «mostly» to «
human activity such as burning fossil fuels»» suggests that conservative Republicans become less likely to agree with the scientific consensus on climate
change the more educated they are.
Accordingly, as relatively «right - leaning» individuals become progressively more proficient in making sense of scientific information (a facility reflected in their scores on the
Ordinary Science Intelligence assessment, which puts a heavy emphasis on critical reasoning skills), they become simultaneously more likely to believe there is «scientific consensus» on
human - caused climate
change but less likely to «believe» in it themselves!
This research adds to the huge compilation of prior peer - reviewed studies that confirm modern climate
change is not out of the
ordinary, and highly likely due to natural causes, not
human - induced as speculated my many.