Therefore, a few days before the two - year statute of limitations for
ordinary negligence cases was to expire, Nava filed a personal injury case against Saddleback.
Therefore, the court found, when the evidence was viewed in favor of the plaintiff, there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendant driver failed to exercise ordinary care (the standard for Georgia
ordinary negligence cases) in parking his truck in front of his home and was therefore potentially negligent.
Not exact matches
In this
case, the Court noted that the
negligence claim was not predicated simply to the placement of the decedent in hospice care, an act that would likely be subject to
ordinary negligence standards, but rather on the treatment provided to the decedent after she was placed in hospice care.
Plaintiff's injury lawyer says that while a fair amount of nursing home
negligence cases involve some allegation of medical malpractice, this issue was one of «basic common sense» and
ordinary negligence.
A recent
case in front of a California appellate court illustrates one plaintiff's battle to classify his injury
case as one of
ordinary negligence.