As is often the case with John, small,
ordinary words such as bread and life are freighted with theological meaning.
Not exact matches
The headset already can be used to control most
ordinary functions in common software,
such as
word processing and spreadsheet programs, by taking the place of a mouse — the cursor simply follows your gaze, and you can think your way into triggering the equivalent of a left or right mouse click.
Not the haburah fellowship meal celebrated by a group of Pharisees; no
such meal existed (J. Jeremias, Eucharistic
Words of Jesus [1965], pp. 30 f.) Not the Qumran communal meal anticipating the «messianic banquet», for all that this may have influenced the Christian practice, because that is simply a special meaning given to the regular communal meal at Qumran, whereas our evidence indicates that the Christian practice was something out of the
ordinary which the early Christians did and which helped to give them a special identity.
As
such, and since the God of Islam is the same God of Christianity and Judaism (according to the Quran that just been certified), Christianity and Judaism are true religions of God with text that has been corrupted (another reason you find contradictions with science because
ordinary humans changed the
word of God so you can see the flaws in it).
The difficulty is a typical example of how easy it is to use
words that have good meanings in
ordinary discourse in
such a way that neither the
ordinary, nor any extraordinary, meaning remains.
So when
such an intellectual tragic hero has his culmination in suffering (in death), then by his last
word he becomes immortal before he dies, whereas the
ordinary tragic hero on the other hand does not become immortal till after his death.
It uses «
ordinary» materials
such as fire, bread, wine, clothing, and books and proscribed
words and gestures as its elements.
Process thought uses its key
words not unfamiliar in
ordinary speech -
words such as «event,» «process, organism,» «sentience» and «internal relations.»
On other occasions, however, he seems to attempt a positive characterization: «
Words and phrases must be stretched toward a generality foreign to their
ordinary usage; and however
such elements of language be stabilized as technicalities, they remain metaphors mutely appealing for the imaginative leap» (Whitehead 1929, p. 6).
Words and phrases must be stretched towards a generality foreign to their
ordinary usage; and however
such elements of language be stabilized as technicalities, they remain metaphors mutely appealing for an imaginative leap.
Partially because of his use of
such ordinary items, Rauschenberg has become known as an artist who, in his own
words, «works in the gap between art and life.»
If the
wording is unclear, consideration should be given to factors
such as object and purpose in order to understand the
ordinary meaning of the BIT and provisions therein.
As
such, the
words are capable of lowering the plaintiff in the estimation of an
ordinary, objective, reasonable member of society who does not have overly fragile sensibilities.
As
such, it must be interpreted according to the modern principle of statutory interpretation: Today there is only one principle or approach, namely, the
words of an Act are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and
ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act and the intention of Parliament.
The judge posed the question: «Whether the character of the natural stream has changed to
such an extent that the channel has become a sewer in the
ordinary, non statutory sense of the
word», based on the case of British Railways Board v Tonbridge and Malling District Council (1981) 79 LGR 565 (BRB).
Who knows what great things could happen in response to
such ordinary, everyday bids or
words of initiating the cycle of love!