These results place general questions on widely acknowledged vertical particle flux models, which apparently do not fully explain the relationship between primary production and
organic carbon burial in high productive areas.
«The evolutionary innovation and expansion of land biota could permanently increase [chemical] weathering intensity and [clay] formation, establishing a new level of
organic carbon burial and oxygen accumulation.»
Marine
organic carbon burial is a source of oxygen to the atmosphere, and its rate is proportional to the amount of phosphate in the oceans.
This in turn triggered decreases in marine phosphate concentrations, productivity,
organic carbon burial and ultimately oxygen.
Not exact matches
A drop in CO2 due to the
burial of
organic carbon in the Late Ordovician is the exact opposite of what is happening now as massive amounts of CO2 are being released; yet, understanding how the historic events occurred can help with future models and predictions, Macleod said.
«After examining rocks 450 million years old or older, we believe the drop was caused by a massive
burial of
organic carbon during the time period,» Quinton said.
To replicate the observed isotopic offset, the model requires that enhanced levels of
organic -
carbon and pyrite
burial continued a few hundred thousand years after peak
organic -
carbon burial, but that their isotope records responded differently due to dramatically different residence times for dissolved inorganic
carbon and sulfate in seawater.
This journey also effectively displaces the area of final
burial of
organic matter (and thus former atmospheric
carbon dioxide) from their place of production.
This occurs when additional nutrients promote atmospheric
carbon sequestration via enhanced photosynthesis leading to accelerated rates of
organic carbon sedimentation and
burial.
I think Peter Ward's theory probably has O2 sinking for other reasons, an imbalance of the
burial and weathering of
organic carbon over geologic time for example.